Member Info for pduk

Jo Creed ~ "... I doubt they would be published here if they weren’t very confident. " It is a legal requirement to publish positive or negative.

The snap decision is based on nothing. The latest RNS is horrendous (but strangely you can't see that) and screws many of us here or otherwise.

You mean a ton more money than he has already made, Daveyboy71?

ps200306 agreed and so does the Market. Graham has been selling/hamming this up to the holders since his first investor chat. 15% dilution - sh*t! Once again us LTH's get the raw deal.

haha @JoeCreed. Chap with snap decisions like that no wonder you are down here and in echo. GL though.

One of Soundboys highlights ~

"RE: Rns07 Jun 2018 07:26
Just spoke to jp via whatsup. The papers were signed 6.30pm this morning. They were working on it all night.bless James he is working tirelessly for us investor's."

Yes, one of the merry JP 'insider' crew. Didn't he brag that he had bought a Porsche? Not sure if it trumps Crudehopes Cruise though.

He's not an idiot for posting that his daughter got married. He was just sharing his good news.

Yes, soooo good that they all did a runner.

spot on, ps200306. Interesting Graham gave again, indirectly, reassurance to the bond holders that we would not default. As you said, if we did then our credit rating would fall on it's a$$ leaving us in an even weaker position from now to raise cash.

"Prime doomsayer you have been proven wrong on my averaging down but of course you are the supreme being as usual. I must remind you that you told us that Sound were finished after your knee jerk reaction to the tax bill"

Johhny come lately / johnny no- show, Re-hashing baseless bullsh*t doesn't suddenly make it true. You was asked to put your money where your money is, and rather like ps200306 requests for answers, you were found to be gutless.

To reiterate, you have 'great empathy for the longer term holders ' but yet you call us sad and miserable? If you really want us to laugh, put up proof of your holding.

No one said Sound would fold over night. What was said was that if they didn't pay the bond , tax bill or not raise more working capital before February 2021 they would. This has been put to you pretty clearly before.

Whats the matter? You don't like it when someone calls you out by asking you for the simplest request for evidence? Gutless!

Johnny no show / johnny come lately.

Anyway, I will leave you to get back to painting your war craft figurines. I'm assuming that's where you get the phrase doomsayer from?

Just as I thought, sharetrader123, you're full of b*llsh*t. You can't even support your claims. Instead you post of your schoolboy posts again as if they hold any value.

Shame as I was looking forward to laughing at you.

Missed a point? I think you'll find you missed the following, chap and forgot to apologise to ps200306.....

~~1) If you have now changed your story (again) and your average is now 3p, then he was correct to say, "based on anything other than it's higher than your breakeven" as even you should know 6p is higher value than 3p You made no mention of Tendrara hence why, quite rightly, he asked you if you had plucked the value out of your a$$?

If your (story) average has now changed, that would suggest you have been buying in recent weeks. How about you use the same tact as ps200306 and prove this with screen shots? Why not put money where your mouth is? We could all do with a laugh!

2) You have 'great empathy for the longer term holders ' but yet you call us sad and miserable?

Is this where you now state you have been a)misquoted b) go quiet c) don't address the questions put to you.~~

No you wasn't. What ps200306 actually posted:-

~~~ ST123: "Either way as you say the SP would increase but a more realistic value would be nearer 6 p IMO."

Is that based on anything other than it's higher than your breakeven, or did you just pluck it out of your a$$? You're a great one for offering opinions without a shred of evidence to back them up.~~~

so ..

1) If you have now changed your story (again) and your average is now 3p, then he was correct to say, "based on anything other than it's higher than your breakeven" as even you should know 6p is higher value than 3p You made no mention of Tendrara hence why, quite rightly, he asked you if you had plucked the value out of your a$$?

If your (story) average has now changed, that would suggest you have been buying in recent weeks. How about you use the same tact as ps200306 and prove this with screen shots? Why not put money where your mouth is? We could all do with a laugh!

2) You have 'great empathy for the longer term holders ' but yet you call us sad and miserable?

Is this where you now state you have been a)misquoted b) go quiet c) don't address the questions put to you.

.....I think you will find it is you who needs to keep up, son.

"Prime doomsayer uk. Wrong again as my average is half that amount"

What are you on about? Half what amount?

"return some greater value to long term holders" but you're not one one of them. You only rocked up a few months ago, scratching around, cap in hand, asking the very people you ridicule for being miserable, to help you understand the company as you couldn't be bothered to read for yourself.

"Ps you are very quick to attack almost every poster"

No he doesn't, Sharetrader123! Just you with your 'Johnny come lately' comments with your spread bet tucked underneath your arm.

Maybe you would be upset/miserable if you had invested the proven 6 figure sums that ps200306 has. We can't all be jolly like you for having invested (sorry spread bet) a couple hundred quid.

I will reiterate ps200306 comment....

ST123: "Either way as you say the SP would increase but a more realistic value would be nearer 6 p IMO."

Is that based on anything other than it's higher than your breakeven, or did you just pluck it out of your a$$? You're a great one for offering opinions without a shred of evidence to back them up.

Well??

Good spot, Jack.

Here you go all....

https://vimeo.com/465712635

*growth

My thoughts are that the current production or proven reserves are not future proof enough to sustain a grown economy moving forward. Solar is the cheaper, cleaner, near term prospect. That is just my opinion of course.

Agreed daveyboy71. It was in either the Attenborough or PW documentaries released this week which showcased how solar was developing at a huge rate in Morocco. Luca and his family are clearly ahead of the curve.

https://www.mees.com/2020/9/11/corporate/morocco-gas-development-dont-hold-your-breath/62206900-f435-11ea-8db4-7f54f7a2aa5a

Sound are mentioned in the last paragraph.

Agree with your entirely, Utilityone1. Interesting that Sharetrader123, who isn't even a long term shareholder here, who doesn't share THE journey as most, is being soo uncharitable as to not allow people, who have lost thousands, to have some hope (rightfully or wrongly), to get some form justice by expressing themselves on a free BB. He or she is more concerned about their tinpot spread bet and misleading people on the actual position of the company. Only a few weeks ago this individual was berating people for posting on here over a weekend to now do exactly the same thing.

I'm on the fence in regards to Trellis and SAG. I have not seen any hard facts as of yet but what i have read and been told is truly shocking!

I would like to apologise for previously mocking/doubting you for suggesting that there was any evidence that the previous BoD had acted improperly. Communicating with a LT SOU investor, who is part of the SAG, I have been brought up to speed in regards to the alleged conduct. Frankly, I'm appalled re: Molenaar Geo consulting , Koba-1. I wish you all the best in underpinning all this together.

"if the SP is 1p or3p as it is pretty meaningless at present."

Well it does matter if you want to raise as much funds without further percentage dilution to the LTH's here. You have been informed by me on several occasions that current cash runs out in February 2021, meaning, going by history, in my opinion a further fund raise will be required in December 2020.

"The board obviously have options based on what deals or partnerships they can agree"

Obviously? No they don't. They have a 'hope to'. You conveniently forget ddboys point in regards to the 14million tax bill and of course the 28.8million bond repayment due in June/July 2021. The asset is ONLY worth what someone is prepared to pay for it and of course the underlining percentage infrastructure costs. We only had one serious offer that allowed exclusivity but turned out that this unknown entity didn't have the funds.