Member Info for pduk

Crudehope, I saw with my own eyes that he had you up on the stage crying like his little puppet as the de facto P.I representative.

Yes, ridiculous to you, but the truth hurts. Interestingly, you didn't deny it. I only post on SOU because that is my ONLY holding for over 10 years. Unlike you, this isn't my day job and I don't have to change what forum I post in on whim.

Laura2022, anyone with 18,262 posts; equivalent of approx 12 posts A DAY, isn't a successful investor or one who isn't paid to be here.

From the annual results... "In April 2026, the Company received a letter from ONHYM seeking a $1.5 million claim against a guarantee made by the Company. The Company is in discussion with ONHYM in respect of this claim. No provision was made as at 31 December 2025 in respect of this claim as the Company has assessed it to be a non-adjusting post balance sheet event."

He will negate this promise or find an excuse not to prove that it has been met. I'm unsure why anyone would thing any different.

He, (con-) )AFKA 'SoundBoy' has spent months not understanding the basics here. Instead spouting any ol' unintelligible, irrelevant dogs**t that came to mind or directly using a chat agent to pass off as 'research' of his own.

This is the chap who suggested that someone here would be jealous of his lifestyle; that's right, seemingly taking budget flights to Morocco then occupying his entire stay by continuing to post his nonsense here. Absolute peasant.

I guess is swerving the investor meeting? The RNS doesn't state him being one of the attendees. To be fair, I wouldn't attend either after a bonus of £600,00+ Lets not forget the handsome salary.

Comical how people are thinking they can raise debt against worthless 'assets' - transition fuel. Have a word with yourselves.

....played an absolute blinder with his £600,000+ bonus

In case you missed it,

Laura2022 - Read the room! You have posted approximately 12 times a day, EVERY DAY, since 2022!!... Either you're very sh*t e at what you do or you're paid to post nonsense.

...... I would hedge that you're useless and paid to post.

No one is interested in your predictions. We have heard it all before .

Laura2022 - Read the room! You have posted approximately 12 times a day, EVERY DAY, since 2022!!... Either you're very sh*t e at what you do or you're paid to post nonsense.

Balancedviewer, "Adam, I'll leave you to talk to the cretins, i've made my point what I think and can't be arsed whilst we wait for news."

What! With 6,782 posts? Dread to think what you're like when you can be, 'arsed'.

Balancedviewer, what's worse? You posting on the weekend or Adam allegedly (I haven't seen it and can't be bothered to) replying from a different time zone?

When are you going to answer PS questions? 4th time of asking. You certainly have the capacity for it.

Balancedviewer, are you suggesting that the more you post, the more credible one becomes? it's always comical when you post; critical of others (Dr Jenner in this case), when since your registration in November 2020 your post count is one reflective of posting every day, including weekends, 4 times daily over 5 years! And for what? Six measly grand (accordingly to you) here. Oh, you never did answer PS's question after numerous times of asking. Strange for someone who has such posting bandwidth.

Adam2911, I think you need to pipe down. You can't even decipher nor comprehend the basic dashboard at the top of this page. Your skill appears to be copious amounts of B.S.

This from you yesterday, "Had argent left...no one would have come in done the job.for what argent was doing it for. Argent and Graham worked for peanuts " sums you up perfectly.

Kylie75, hate to be that person but don't YOU need to be an investor to attend or indeed care?

You avoided the questions @balancedviewer whilst waffling about conspiracies. Would seem you're trying to avoid them, strange since you have a post count of 6,623 , have another go.....

BV: "yes i have done my research about Gaia Energy who have multiple large projects with multiple partners over the years."

Great. Give us the names of a few of the completed solar deployments in Morocco that Gaia has been involved in?

BV: "SOU only need 50% of the cost in the Solar project, so once the first is up and running the income from solar sales will self fund the rest ... I think you need to do the research thinking the Solar is only a 20 mw project, when it's going to ramp up to 270mw."

Who's the other 50%? And I presume you mean 50% of 10% since GL mentioned 90% debt financing. So you reckon SOU can persuade someone to lend them $18m, raise $2m of their own, THEN apply for one of the new liberalised medium voltage grid connections, plan and execute the construction, and make enough operating profit to rinse and repeat EVERY 12 WEEKS (which is what it would take to get their 270 MW up and running in three years). You realise 270 MW of solar is the renewables analogue of James Parsons 31 Tcf of gas ... assumes every last detail will go exactly to plan and on schedule with unlimited financing available. The reality is that all of SOU's projects have been years behind schedule and nobody would touch them with a barge pole for finance, resulting in them getting stretched over a barrel by Managem. If you'd been around more than a wet week you'd know this.

BV: "I personally think that the consolidation is to give SOU far more financial independence for future debt restructuring / borrowing for producing asset expansion. The debt restructuring ratio is one of the main priorities Andy has already mentioned, so i guess this is the purpose imo."

"Debt restructuring ratio" isn't a thing. The first time you used the term I put it down to a typo. Seems you actually think it's a real concept. In any case, the share consolidation has nothing to do with existing debt.

SOU's only mission should be to preserve shareholder value through to Phase 2 implementation. The last thing we need is a new CEO with delusions of grandeur. But I expect that's what we've got. You should probably be thankful you only have a pittance of a shareholding.

How does the consolidation facilitate any borrowing? It's being done exactly because SOU *can't* borrow -- nobody will lend to them. Reducing the nominal share value below the share price allows them to issue new equity which they are currently not allowed to do. They are telling you as plain as day that they are going to dilute existing shareholders. What's not clear is how much they intend to raise and for what purpose.

Is it because nobody will give them the bridging finance they sought, which case they might only seek maybe £1m for a likely 10% dilution? Or is it to cover more expansive plans such as solar projec

Aaaaaaaaaaaah @balancedviewer like clockwork, you spout the ol' paid boiler room and multiple username conspiracies. As you are the only one who spouts this nonsense, though it makes any difference here, you could argue that you're self projecting.

Here again are the questions that ps200306 put to you which you comically avoided. Lets have your Johnny-come-lately answers which consulting a chat agent (I will know when you have plagiarised). I'm sure you can find some legroom considering your 6,622post count....

BV: "I personally think that the consolidation is to give SOU far more financial independence for future debt restructuring / borrowing for producing asset expansion. The debt restructuring ratio is one of the main priorities Andy has already mentioned, so i guess this is the purpose imo."

"Debt restructuring ratio" isn't a thing. The first time you used the term I put it down to a typo. Seems you actually think it's a real concept. In any case, the share consolidation has nothing to do with existing debt.

How does the consolidation facilitate any borrowing? It's being done exactly because SOU *can't* borrow -- nobody will lend to them. Reducing the nominal share value below the share price allows them to issue new equity which they are currently not allowed to do. They are telling you as plain as day that they are going to dilute existing shareholders. What's not clear is how much they intend to raise and for what purpose.

Is it because nobody will give them the bridging finance they sought, which case they might only seek maybe £1m for a likely 10% dilution? Or is it to cover more expansive plans such as solar projects (seeing as the hydrogen partnership is an utterly worthless boondoggle)? Even assuming 90% debt financing is available for solar, a paltry 20MW scheme at, say, $1/W of CAPEX would require SOU to find $2m. I presume Gaia won't be coming up with half of that, given they are an even more worthless company than GeTech. I presume you've done your research and know that they've been going since 2008 with no sign of a successful partnership to date, and the CEO is a loon whose side hustle is spiritual therapy sessions with gong music?

SOU's only mission should be to preserve shareholder value through to Phase 2 implementation. The last thing we need is a new CEO with delusions of grandeur. But I expect that's what we've got. You should probably be thankful you only have a pittance of a shareholding.

BV: "yes i have done my research about Gaia Energy who have multiple large projects with multiple partners over the years."

Great. Give us the names of a few of the completed solar deployments in Morocco that Gaia has been involved in?

BV: "SOU only need 50% of the cost in the Solar project, so once the first is up and running the income from solar sales will self fund the rest ... I think you need to do the research thinking the Solar is only a 20 mw project, when it's going to ramp up to 270mw."

Hahahah @balancedviewer Just as I thought! What a weak individual.

Balancedviewers pathetic retort after being opened up like a Peshwari Naan by ps200306 salient, researched points:- "Ps200. Well all i can say is let's see what happens. After all i'm not the one who over invested and lost loads of dosh and posting at 2am in the morning having sleepless nights. Either way stop worrying about other peoples money if it doesn't bother them."

hahahhahah. ps200306 laid it on a plate for you but all you could conjure up was a weak dig about his bedtime (when you yourself have posted on a weekend!)

Rubber.Soul - "This magid or whatever he’s called" It's 'Majid', the reference to these two syllables is plastered all over the internet. It's not difficult. Do better fella, as you sound like a bit of a uneducated, common pleb.

Balancedviewer "Pduk. It is only Graham that has salvaged SOU and it's investors from going under. Its's no use having assets/ permits if the funding isn't there to exploit them." ... Whoa there Cowboy! And who paid for these assets and to fulfil permitting obligations? That's right, not you or Graham but the long term shareholders here that you try to dismiss.

Yes, thanks Graham for giving away 55% of Tendrara, missing every conceivable deadline whilst paying yourself a £600k+ bonus. I'm certain the board at Berkley will unveil a statue for such business ingenuity.

Are you sure you're not Adam2911? After your 'brilliant' endorsement of the woeful Medias24 article, below, surely we don't have two people who share identical half-wit, Cognitive impairment?

Oh, of course you're interested - you continue to hang off every word.