Member Info for Pbow

Fort they apparently applied for the EIA in 2024….. so ahead of us there. A clear distinction for me though - they said they would do the PFS in 2H 2025 and they did it….. have we ever met a deadline?

I seriously doubt you would have got into Imperial with an AAB in the 90s. That aside you wouldn’t today (though I accept that may not be the case for someone not white British) . You wouldn’t prob need 5 As today

There is absolutely zero chance that anyone (seemingly barring you) thinks Durham is better than Imperial.

If you are talking the top 3 unis in the UK it’s oxbridge and Imperial. Durham is in the top 10 probably.

Personally I’ve only really valued my degrees for the fact it got me my first job, which was decent, and it makes work visas easier. Apparently my uni is top 10 - depends which ranking you read if it’s better or worse than Durham. Personally though don’t really care - I’m not the vice chancellor of Manchester University so it doesn’t impact me in the slightest.

I think on balance reading it (and without doing a detailed analysis) there is far more to be excited about in this report than concerned. Really looking forward to seeing the cascabel update whenever that is.

Fort reading this there is absolutely zero chance the cascabel capex will be half this figure based on the updated production.

That being said TAM is clearly a LOT shallower than Solaris pit . They need two years to strip it - must be circa 30m deep. There resource is huge - the LOM is restricted by the tailings. I think TAM could change everything esp seeing the cut off they are using and our pfs uses for TAM.

Reading the press release raises so many questions and relevant points for solgold.

The power requirements are huge, they have reduced cutoff - a good bit less than TAM. I think the Cascable PFS will be massively different than now reading this.

Fort the LOM is artificially lowered - best ignored really.

Started making notes - got an hour flight lets see how far I get through the release.

The pre construction capex seems high. Just got a plane so dont have time to go through but is it assuming huge production or something?

Jack again just because he met with Australia over something doesnt mean thats why he is meeting someone else. Each country has its own priorities.

Yes Elero i went to what was the Victoria Uni of Manchester then did my masters at what was UMIST. Bought my first house in Victoria Park. Pretty much straight after graduation. Lived in Halls of Residence in Vic Park as well - Dalton Ellis.

I used to live in Victoria Park - my first house was there. Schuster Road :-) Happy times in the Rampant Lion!!!!

No Jack its because Western Australia is closer to China than the USA is.

You cant just twist everything to what your wet dreams are fella.

To stop drugs being shipped to the USA. Which is also why they are bombing ships in the carribean.

The military base likely location is either Manta or Galapagos as per the press to facilitate maritime survellaince and drug interception. But if you read the various news articles on the matter you would know this.

I mean Jack do you really think that because when Trump met the PM of Australia the key topic was mining that it means that will be the topic when he meets every world leader...... i mean you really are thick 🤣😂 bet he had a cracking chat about mining with King Charles.

Columbo you are not.

Is Australia asking the US to open a military base in the Northern Territories or is there no need as there already is one.

That aside we could consult the local press to see what they think will be the subject of discussions....

https://ensegundos.com.pa/2025/11/04/noboa-espera-reunirse-con-trump-en-las-proximas-dos-o-tres-semanas/

https://www.juventudrebelde.cu/internacionales/2025-11-03/noboa-vuelve-a-ee-uu

We could also look at the delegation going...

Foreign Minister Gabriela Sommerfeld; the Secretary General of Communication, Irene Vélez; and the Secretary General of Public Integrity, José Julio Neira.

Would you not expect the ministry that covers minining to be there if you are right?

Yes I use my brain Jack - shame you dont engage yours

I will make a positive comment on the referendum if it passes and the election for the assembly tasked with drafting the new constitution ends with a good body. Until then its white noise.

In terms of Trump meeting Noboa - given the last I read was that he was seeking a meeting again Ill wait and see if it happens and what is disucssed. One expects it would be focused on opening a American military base (which is a separate part of the referendum) rather than mining.

Nice to see your extensive use of ChatGPT Jack

Https://www.bnamericas.com/es/entrevistas/lundin-gold--ecuador-es-un-tesoro-escondido-en-mineria

No doubt Jackanory will take the above as proof that Lundin are about to buy exploreco.

Elero Toxteth also isnt anything like 99% mixed race.

In terms of negativity people need to learn nuance. Jack is linking events to something that might not happen or dont help.

* We dont need expedited permitting for Cascabel - maybe if we had got it over a year ago when Jack first said it was going to be announced it would have helped.

* Jack splits out the EIA and the construction permitting despite them being one and the same. The EIA is one of the main permits you need for construction.

* The CIPA is not linked to the referendum at all. It can be signed off today. Clearly its probably best not to risk announcing it now politically but thats the only reason.

But lets imagine the referendum fails - am I being negative in pointing out that it isnt linked?!? Jack throws out these wild theories saying the share price will rocket if they happen - what if they dont. By his points the share price should collapse but it wont because it doesnt matter!!!! The poll I saw had a lead for the presidents position but it wasnt anything like as big as suggested by Rodney (I did ask to see the ones he referenced and would be interested to do so).

Jack i assume you consider yourself "informed". Can you give 5 examples of instances where your bat sh*t crazy predictions came true. Im struggling to think of any.

Your latest on that the referendum to ask if a committee should be formed to write a new constitution which will then need a referendum before its enacted having any material impact imminently is just the latest example of you not having basic comprehsion skills.