Member Info for NettlesTheCat

£12.

I think the news that Tim suggested he was looking at deal(s) pre xmas give us reason to support the idea that this will climb even quicker than it has (since I got in a 1.69 only a few weeks ago).

My suggestion is 24p for Monday, and 38p for end of week.

Something not right, I agree - pre mining it was 0.84.

Let's wait until the 95% cash at shipping shows on the accounts, so next quarterlies hopefully.

I have faith this will come true.

Anyway, thank you for your hospitality here chaps, very much appreciated and I will continue to look in - and apologies again for taking this off tangent to everyone else.

All the very best to all of you - remember who your number one cat friend is when you get that boat! 🛥️ 😂

Met1 = 23.2% down by the way, just checked 👍

"He went the way of the MET1 Debacle, but he is in low. I do hope it pays off for him, its Quite a Gamble its such a strange set up, after a a fair while I decided it wasn't for me."

Yeah, small punt on that but you are correct, a little down. Currently 27 stocks in the 'pawtfolio' and whilst some or red on a daily basis, the amount I have in those I really want to invest in gives me a decent return (so far). Massive high risk, but 99.9% up in 5 weeks.

Waiting for that bubble to burst! 💥

"Why do you think I'm into investment trusts or ETF's."

I will google it mate, but just asking - I'm guessing by your response that there is no/little management fee for ETFs? I'm with Barclays/AJ Bell managed and I know as soon as I don't look after my own investments and transfer to a managed fund/ETF, they charge a fee for managing.

"NTC, one question. I read through the thread tonight and noticed you saying you were a fool for not investing in Empire. Now I know you’ve missed some early profits but can I ask…. Why can’t/won’t you invest now?"

To high for me - yes I know it's going north but I'm a stickler for getting in mega cheap. I applaud you all for doing it, and I stand by the fact that I was either ignorant or two beers worse off when CEV originally told me about it. Credit to CEV, and you all.

I'm heavy into other bits now so if truth be told, no capital of any degree to get serious money from EEE.

But again, you guys deserve all the profits this has to give. Well done 👍

10 fold? We'll see, but I agree this is only going north.

"Same with EEE. It was also around the 1p+ area. For months on end"

Last post tonight, I've been on the RR forum for around 5 years, reasons that others will tell you in my regard to their increase from 34p RI.

Anyway, CEV on there told me about EEE at the low point and I was a fool not to get involved, my 'gut' said it wasn't right. What a story that is. Well done for getting in buddy.

Biggest mistake I made to not get involved.

Yes News, again 100% correct. I recently got into IMM at 1.69 (you can see where they are now) but all along the way I was questioning everything.

My questions soon got cleared from the table (that I was happy about!) but they were decent questions along the way, and some still remain.

We only make money from due diligence buddy (as I'm sure you already know), so please excuse my questions in the way that they are nothing more than very negative points. Once they get shoved off the table, I'm a happy cat 😺

Have a great evening.

Cheers Freezer11, we all hope the results are going to be amazing and as News suggests, the prior drilling 15km away gave GGP that rise we all destine for (beach, constant mojitos and a boat or two) 😂.

I've still convinced that will be the case if truth be told.

Good to see you Whisp3r!

As stated, I don't fully believe my questions to be facts here - it's what I like to call due diligence. If the assay of Hole1 is equal/more than what WSBN suggested, then the gloves are off and we know they are raising funds for Hole2 and thereafter. Awesome, my gut is calmed and I'll buy a boat with you guys.

If the assay of Hole1 is less than what WSBN suggested, then these questions are valid and we need to look carefully at future involvement.

"We will need to get used to placings after rises though, part of the game as an explorer until someone comes along."

Totally agree - but a sceptic would suggest they issued an RNS to get to an SP they wanted to issue the placing?. Simple question, why not wait for the "expedited assay" results to then issue a placing at, let's say 3p or even more, once the assay confirmed the results? Less than half the capital.

I feel like I'm berating WSBN and I certainly don't want to - but common sense suggests a confident board would want to wait for assay. Why didn't they wait, and why are they eager to give up on hole1?

Again, I totally agree with you News. I honestly do, and it's extremely exciting.

But prior to assay results, we're left with a few questions that are worthy of debate. My gut tells me to keep focus at Hole1 and wait for assay to then fully drill. They can drill at hole2 anytime in the future. "We may return to Hole1 in the future" (from the RNS) doesn't balance with what they think they have found.

Put it this way, if the assay of the breccia of Hole1 are less than WSBN presented, my gut will go into overload and possibly tell my brain something else is happening here.

It certainly does News, and apologies if you thought I was being hostile, I honestly wasn't.

The whole reason I'm still here is exactly the reason you state - HOWEVER (you knew that was coming), the raise of funds after the SP raise based on the news pre assay still get's my gut (sorry).

I, like you and many others, will be extremely happy when the assay of Hole 1 suggest get even close to what the WSBN have suggested.

I've been in this game for a while, and I see RNS to raise SP to gain placings at higher values to then have the rug pulled from us. I'm only being realistic, and although I may not fully agree with the points I raise, they are certainly points for debate. 👍

"So you doubled your pot in a few weeks, not bad, is that with HE1 and KOD?"

No, I think you know that. Have a look at my website and you'll see the vast array of stocks that got me there. IMM (bought at 1.69) and WSBN (bought average of 0.40).

Hope that helps 👍

With all due respect, I think we know that already - just waiting anticipated assay results.

I think the movement from Hole1 to Hole2 is significant. Not wanting to play devils advocate here, and although I'm going to be a LTH holder here and think the significance of the findings and association geographically to what we know to be hot spots, I do have to raise two points:

1) Did the big RNS (purely from WSBN) of alluded signs of 'outstanding' results from the breccia pipe(s) at Hole1 raise the SP to an amount to enable WSBN to get that £1.5m (1.25sp) placing? It was at 0.39 when I last topped up, which would have meant at least a 4 fold on the placing to get the same money.

2) The desire to move so quickly from hole1 to hole2? Are they anticipating assay on hole1 that don't totally back up their 'outstanding' results?

Again, no hate from me on this share as I'm in for the long run, but my gut keeps on asking me those two major questions.

Last question, honest! What are you paying percentage/money wise for the ETF holdings?