RE: Depressed!23 Feb 2019 15:23
I have sympathy with the view expressed about SDX spending all its income on exploration with no sign of shareholder benefit. I would point out that this is a flawed view in a number of respects:
1. I don’t have a problem with an O & G company spending on exploration after all that is the company’s raison d'être as long as it is proving up reserves and increasing production. Nor do I have an issue with the majority being gas – it’s a more stable commodity. SDX are doing this but maybe not as fast as some would wish.
2. When you break down the CapEx for this year a good deal, about $18.5m, is for SD development. Essentially a one-off for pipeline and processing facilities; yes there will be maintenance and depreciation to set against this asset but it should not have to be spent again.
3. Increased revenue and profit are generated by not spending money and/or increasing profitable income. SD is a good example $18.5m will not needing to be spent again and about $12m net profit annually. So as much as $30m to the good in a full year
4. Following on from point 3 the respected Edison research group reinforces this by putting 2020 cash at near $70m https://www.edisoninvestmentresearch.com/?ACT=18&ID=23093&LANG= I don’t believe we will see that much as there has been the slippage with SD and I suspect they would spend some on the two newly granted concessions. Also having that much cash lying idle does not make business sense
5. Assuming they are going to generate the type of cash that Edison forecasts then they should employ it sensibly. One option is to declare a dividend and give the patient shareholders some cheer, another would be to increase the tempo of development and maybe seek more acreage. Lastly if they added an equal amount of debt, which they could easily service, it would give them a war chest in excess of $100m for acquisitions.
As to share price recovery who knows