Member Info for mrcautious

I dont think this is super-high, the share has already been in shouting distance of this figure in 2018 and some others are quoting far higher prices once in production.

Question is, what will Greg25 do if all of his dead cert statements prove to be incorrect -- disappear forever and change LSE identity perhaps. I have seen this so many times on these BB's...

Well that embarrassing for Observer842 !

Where do you get the 35% annual rate of return figure from dare I ask !

It isnt an algorithm its just a post counter, the more posts, the more ramping that is happening !

I wonder if he is paid per post basis, or as a lump sum bonus at the end in the event of a successful takeover ?

Crikey - just dropped in to the board and see BB is still going strong !!

Sadly Sirius was grossly let down by the UK government IMO !!

BB - I accept the british access to the resource is not a primary play, but a) isnt it a bad thing for a chinese company to gain full control of a resource so cheaply ? b) Even given Ganfengs offtake agreement WHY should shareholders allow them to takeover the company so cheap. If you had a pile of cash on your coffee table and a man rushed in and grabbed it would you do nothing ?? I know your agenda is to make us all capitulate and lose the will to live regarding this potential deal - but it aint going to happen. Even if NO British company EVER buys any of this Li the Western economies do not want Chinese dominance of strategic resources to happen.

sky - Dont think borderbob is an engineer, I happen to be an electronic engineer by sheer fluke ! And I can see his argument has picky holes in it regarding solar PV's

Borderknob is in overdrive today I see ! Lots of plausible sounding neg-facts being poured out. On the subject of offtake, even if Ganfeng did have first shout on Lithium produced, if we still controlled the resource we would control the price and other factors, but if we did not Ganfeng could do whatever they liked forever. Control is everything as Playtex once may have said ! I'll spell it out to BB one more time WE ARE NOT SELLING OUR SHARES TO CHINA FOR A PITTANCE !! Please take this message back to your employers.

Every week that goes by in not closing Amapa sees further cash-burn by these guys its true...

Evan - this is very very true. During the height of covid I traded some shares I would consider Rat-poo normally. In fact considering how I started investing about 13 years ago, I sometimes envy the freedom emotion-free trading can give you !

I'm sure this is true. When people commit fraud on investments they often rely on the 'oh well once bitten I'll move on' factor. But I think people have got the bit between the teeth on this one, I wish I could see into the future and say "was Secker culpable after all" !!

Sometimes I do wonder what the real purpose of these boards is. To discuss theories and research on a share or to disclose a piece of research some may not have seen, or just tactical ramping/deramping or worse paid share manipulation ! If you look at BCN right now there is at least 1 person who we are sure is in league with a major shareholder of the company itself !

Fozdog - whilst I am very very anti-this deal I think if it were announced the SP would go straight to 67.5p unless it was suspended, thus allowing some to dump..

With Lenigas you have to sell, when he goes quiet to fit in with his buy-pump-dump strategy. Trouble is 7/8 years ago people just thought he was a harmless Aussie mucker and got burnt.

Its ironic - rather like drug dealer turning homeless charity worker !

I think this is right. Why would a car manufacturer be buying raw materials in this way, they buy their batts from a battery manufacturer. Car companies dont buy copper to make the wires nor do they cadt their own alternators and water pumps..

This is great news and encouraging that someone else has bounced in at 3% !