RE: Deeks tweet23 Feb 2021 07:52
I have no issue with Deeks challenging LFTs and urging caution. I take issue with the way he does it and his lack of ingenuity on how to drive forward progress. He uses a broad brush to discredit them and doesn’t provide any useful or practical mitigations or alternatives. When asked on Twitter about that - he said that isn’t my job. That really sums it up - he feels it his sole job to discredit LFTs and clearly enjoys the job whilst claiming to be thrust into the spotlight. Whilst Innova was inferior the results for professional use were far better. What does that tell you?? Education and training is required. Make no mistake people - if Avacta get great results and it is used as the sovereign LFT, Deeks will be all over like a bad rash saying I told you so the first time someone somewhere gets a false negative and infects a bunch of ravers in Somerset. The infectious one probably put it in his ear but doesn’t want to mention it because he had a sore throat but really wanted to party. My point is that any LFT will have user issues and will be an honour system where not done professionally but it will certainly reduce transmission significantly and hopefully slow down mutations so we can get in with our lives.