Member Info for LOTM-13

Grrr ran out of room!

It will be fascinating to see how its analysis of the pictures compares to the actual assay results when they come out.

I also asked it for its view of the grades of the 737-757M interval ..........

Grade projections (guided by the vertical zonation above)

Copper (Cu): ~0.4–0.8% average, with local spikes up to ~1.0% on vein intersections.

Rationale: Diminishing chalcopyrite proportion outside the breccia matrix, but still present along vein margins.

Gold (Au): ~0.25–0.6 g/t average; local highs to ~0.8 g/t where veining is most intense.

Rationale: Late quartz–carbonate pulses can retain Au, especially in comb‑textured or banded veins.

Silver (Ag): ~3–5 g/t typical; local highs ~6 g/t near sulphide‑rich bands.

Rationale: Ag often tracks with Cu in these late veins but with more variability.

Variability: Grades are likely “spiky” at 737–757 m—higher at vein clusters/structures, lower in intervening intact host rock.

Direct answer

Expectation: 737–757 m should remain mineralized but more “spiky” than the mid-pipe zone—localized Cu 0.6–1.0% and Au up to ~0.8 g/t where veins cluster (notably around ~746 m), tapering to lower composites where carbonate sealing dominates.

LOTM

Thanks Dunk_Biscuit, but wish I was a geologist with stuff like this!

Anyway I'm not IT in any way but I've just spend some time with Smart GPT-5 !

I asked it to do various things, one was to pay particular attention to the right hand picture in figure 6, page 5 of the 18/08/25 RNS, the detailed picture it drew of the 642-646M section with labels was amazing.

I asked it to view all the core pictures & compare all 3 zones it identified within the Breccia Pipe - upper, middle & lower & to give estimates on possible grades for those sections, this was its findings .......

Upper interval (570–580 m)

Brecciation: Present but less intense — clasts are larger and more intact.

Veining: Fewer quartz–carbonate veins, mostly thin and discontinuous.

Sulphides: Sparse chalcopyrite/pyrite, often confined to vein margins.

Alteration: Hematite staining is patchy; chlorite/sericite halos are weak.

Interpretation: This is nearer the top of the pipe where fluid flow was less focused — mineralization is present but not as concentrated

Upper interval (570–580 m)

Brecciation: Moderate

Veining: Sparse

Grades:

Cu: ~0.2–0.4%

Au: 0.1–0.3 g/t

Ag: 1–2 g/t

Correlation: Lower grades match the weaker veining and less intense alteration — fewer pathways for metal‑rich fluids.

Middle interval (642–646 m)

Brecciation: Very intense — angular clasts in a fine‑grained matrix.

Veining: Dense network of cross‑cutting quartz–carbonate veins.

Sulphides: Chalcopyrite and pyrite both in veins and matrix.

Alteration: Strong hematite halos and pervasive chlorite/sericite.

Interpretation: This is the “sweet spot” — maximum permeability and repeated fluid pulses, leading to higher potential grades.

Middle interval (642–646 m)

Brecciation: Intense

Veining: Dense quartz–carbonate network

Grades:

Cu: 1.0–1.5% (spike)

Au: 0.8–1.2 g/t (spike)

Ag: 6–8 g/t (spike)

Correlation: This is the “sweet spot” — maximum permeability and repeated fluid pulses concentrate metals in both veins and matrix.

Lower interval (715–722 m)

Brecciation: Still strong, but clasts are more rounded — possible re‑cementation.

Veining: Veins are thicker but less abundant; some late‑stage carbonate fill.

Sulphides: Chalcopyrite persists but is patchier; pyrite more common.

Alteration: Hematite is less intense; chlorite alteration dominates.

Interpretation: This may be closer to the base of the mineralizing system — fluids were still active but possibly cooler or waning, changing the mineral assemblage.

Lower interval (715–722 m)

Brecciation: Strong but more rounded clasts

Veining: Thicker but less abundant

Grades:

Cu: 0.5–0.7%

Au: 0.3–0.5 g/t

Ag: 3–4 g/t

Correlation: Still mineralized, but the system was waning — fewer fresh fractures, more late carbonate sealing, and cooler fluids.

It will be fascinating to see how its analysis of the pictures compares to the assay r

Maybe we can finally get back to discussing Red Setter, rather than the share price movements !

Dunk_Biscuit found this https://portergeo.com.au/database/mineinfo-mb.asp?mineid=mn224 well worth a read.

I have many unanswered questions that the WSBN board of directors need to start addressing via an educational new Presentation !

Has the Heritage surveys been carried out all round Red Setter so that WSBN can create drill pads where ever it feels appropriate to do so ? if not why not.

Can you confirm that the quoted 520M, 570M, 722M & 777M figures are hole length's & not true depth from surface ?

What is the forward plan regarding the cut-cores? are they being tested in depth order, or are you prioritising particular sections over others & how long is it likely to be before you have assay result to publish ? Are you going to be publishing them in batches as soon as you receive them ?

Red Setter Dome is SE/NW trending, so why are you drilling it from the north with holes 25RSDD001, 25RSDD003A & the new hole & saying the new hole is targeting the centre of the Dome when in actual fact in all public data images it appears to be located away from the Dome's centre ?

Conventional drilling methodology would be to drill Red Setter either NE towards SW or SW towards NE to intersect the target at the best angle to get true width's, so why are you not doing this & drilling along lines L1480N & L1500N (I'm guessing these are more than 100M apart so L1490N as well) aiming for 550M depth to hit the dome & then the step out on the same line by 100M to hit it at 650M etc) to create an initial 100M x 100M grid.

Assuming all 6 holes hit mineralisation, you can then continue to do 100M spacing so aim for 750M Dome intersection & if that is successful in the 1st hole then you can drill the next one 200M away at the same depth to increase the extend of the mineralisation & save on cost of a hole for now.

Yes this will not give you a C1 resource number, but it will give you a very good indication as to Red Setter's potential mineralised size.

Enough for now.

LOTM

Hi news,

No way the "deepening" of Hole 25RSDD001 & Hole 25RSDD003A even to 1200M was going to use up all the funds they previously raised, even the drilling of the new hole won't use up those funds either.

LOTM

I think it best for now that I don't post on APTA during the day, given how well its doing when I don't!

Another stellar day for APTA, well done everyone, just a case of waiting on the next piece of news!

LOTM

TheMagnacarta,

"This will bomb or rocket depending on the next results. Fact."

Hole 25RSDD001 was not drilled in a prime location & no-one knows what part of the 257M interval they had assayed 1st ?

Did they start at the top & just work there way down or did they select various bits of most interest ? or did they start with the Breccia Pipe ?

& What do you consider to be a good or bad number in terms of size of section (M) & grade ? & then they were likely still in mineralisation at 777M so how much deep will it go ?

Personally I'm expecting the better results to come from the lower section of the core to date (722 - 777M) but that's just my hunch ............

LOTM

Dunk_Biscuit,

The funny thing is the minerals AU/CU at Telfer are not located in the same geology, they talk about Breccia, but its not a Breccia Pipe & very different.

Looks like there is a leak somewhere - surprise surprise given the leak on the placing............. most likely now on the assay results.

Expect to see a high CU % at Red Setter Dome than Telfer & on what I found out on my research earlier today PB & ZN are possibilities as well but in very low grade, if they are present then its going to be linked to my overnight research, if not then the major deep fault separated the mineralising events.

LOTM

Dunk_Biscuit,

Thanks for the portergeo link :) a very interesting read so far & I've still a lot more of it to read, others should be doing the same & learning from it

Fascinating that the CU grades at Telfer match the best intersect discovered so far at E 45/ 5297 ........

LOTM

Morning All,

There is a lot of information out there in the public domain, if you just go & spend the time looking for it.

For example did you know that the Telfer Dome is over 8km in length ?

Did you know that Tenement E 45 / 5297 is about 80% surround by one very large Tenement ?

Did you know that their is a least one very deep major fault that runs through E 45/ 5297 ?

Did you know that drilling less than 2km to the north of the northern edge of E 45/ 5297 at a prospect called "Sundew" also had CU/AU intercepts similar to those found in those first 12 WSBN holes ?

LOTM

Hi Sharecrazie,

Could you post the full D.L message if possible please ?

Did he really put out #Gold Dome ?

If he did then he's kind of let the cat out of the bag! unless he's referred to it as #Gold Dome previously !

LOTM

40034427,

Those drill inter-sects are from old holes that were drilled at a different target on the property, if you'd actually spent some time reading the links I posted last night & again this morning on the WSBN thread you'd know that, but you haven't because your here to try & promote other shares instead.

If your truly interest in WSBN then go & have a read of those documents for your research & then make up your mind accordingly.

LOTM

Lesh8,

Personally I'm not at all impressed with them doing the placing at this time & I will in due course let the CEO & Chairman know that fact for sure.

However it was for under 5% of the company so not that dilutive, but it sent the wrong message to the market about the pending hole 1 assay results before even the first results were known.

For me a really poor decision by the directors in that respect.

As for Mr Lenigas, he's not someone I've really come across before, but his tweets at the weekend were designed to use the WSBN publicity to his advantage & for other companies he's involved with. So I'm not very impressed with him either as he's shown why people have had an issue with him in the past. The BOD will need to take that fact onboard going forward.

This was from the 5th Oct 2020 announcement https://wishbonegold.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/RNS_WSBN_Acquisition_of_option_on_Significant_Havieron__Telfer_Region_Tenement_Package_bk0q201005.pdf

"Wishbone has signed an exclusive 45 day option to acquire the Patersons Range Project

and has agreed to pay the vendors an option payment £50,000. Wishbone has already

commenced due diligence on the projects and will complete this during the 45-day option

period. Assuming that Wishbone proceeds to acquire the projects, Wishbone will issue the

vendors (being Peter Romeo Gianni, Geonomics Australia Pty Ltd and David Anthony

Lenigas) an additional £183,333 in cash, issue 11,111,111 new ordinary shares (Acquisition

Shares) at a deemed issue price of 3.3p equating to £366,667 in aggregate and 5,555,555

warrants (Acquisition Warrants) to subscribe for one new ordinary share in the capital of the

Company. The Acquisition Warrants will be exercisable for a period of 24 months from

admission of the Acquisition Shares at the price of 3.3 pence per ordinary share."

So he did pretty well out of Red Setter, 1st time round & he may have also kept a small ORRI or NSR on the property as well, we simply don't know.

He's not on the board of directors, he's just a consultant.

LOTM

Well 40034427,

You broke your own rule on sticking to the facts before you even got to half way along your 2nd line of that last post.

"The deposit here is very low grade deep underground compared to likes of Omi or MILA"

No-one currently knows what the grades are or aren't, so how can you say for sure that the deposit here is very low grade ? you can't therefore its not factually accurate, before we even get into the realms of what is or isn't low grade in terms of gramms per ton or % per tonne.

You just wanted to try & push those other 2 names, that's all.

LOTM

Remember today is day 6 in Perth of drilling the new hole.

They should now be at the stage of setting surface casing at 150M or so & be ready to start drilling towards the Dome.

Its also day 4 since all of the cores (257M) were meant to be in Perth for cutting (viewing ) & to start assaying them, so it shouldn't be very long now until we get the first lot of results coming through (& we get to find out whether they have just started to assay from 520M & work there way down or have done it another way instead).

So highly likely we will get an RNS by Monday lunchtime at the very latest I'd say & still a reasonable chance of getting an update later on today.

GLA

LOTM

Hmm Director doesn't bother to report his share purchase for 2 weeks after the event.

Not a transparent way for them to behave.

LOTM

Hi Imperiallondon,

Well you must have been very sporty back then ! 13 Gold Medals - very well done indeed.

Thanks for the reassuring update on Biomarkers & their potential revenue streams :)

As everyone says the story just gets better & better, just need to get on more investors radar's !

GLA

LOTM

I think your going to find the assay results contain both AU & CU in them, its just a case of ore grades & thicknesses, as to whether it looks commercial or not.

LOTM

There are a lot of questions that definitely need answering & soon by the BOD.

hxxps://zenodo.org/records/13917889 talks about a SE/NW dome. So it will be important to find out if its SE/NW & not NW/SE as that would tilt it in the wrong direction.

If we for a minute assume that Expert Geophysics Limited's interpretation of the data is correct, then why are WSBN drilling from North of the target ?

Normally if the structure was thought to lie in a SE/NW you would normally drill the target either in a NE/SW or SW/NE direction depending if you thought the ore body was in / or \ direction. so why are WSBN drilling from the north other than having drill pads that Heritage approved.

We also need to know that WSBN has got Heritage approval to drill Red Setter Dome from any location it chooses.

LOTM

For anyone who might have missed last nights posts ......

"Some interesting research for you to view

Https://www.linkedin.com/posts/expertgeophysics_mobilemt-mobilemt-mobilemt-activity-7360852352725110785-o0lD

Contains images I've not seen in any of the WSBN RNS's !

hxxps://media.licdn.com/dms/image/v2/D5622AQGMriKZPwUKxw/feedshare-shrink_2048_1536/B56ZicANfSG4A0-/0/1754963958347?e=2147483647&v=beta&t=jYPVi9mUnNezBX1xq1aXwlhNeP1p0_6lnPRRDm4lRBI

The last 2 images have been seen, but not the 1st three !

image 3 for example highlights deep faults, within the dome structure. It was deep faults that provided the source of the mineralisation within the Telfer Dome!

Also look at the size of the Red Setter Dome!

I would then strongly suggest you open & read this ...........

hxxps://zenodo.org/records/13917889

Wish I were a geologist to fully understand it, but I'm not".

LOTM

Hi Casper786,

The drill rig is already set-up & drilling 7 could very well be close to setting surface casing at 150M.

Yes I know the RNS said the new hole is meant to be drilled towards the centre, but when you look at the picture, that's not the visual reality, the centre of the blue dome is to the east of hole 25RSDD001 & the new hole is going to the south west of hole 25RSDD001 !

Now the only thing I can think of is a kind of double dome within the dome you see in https://media.licdn.com/dms/image/v2/D5622AQGMriKZPwUKxw/feedshare-shrink_2048_1536/B56ZicANfSG4A0-/0/1754963958347?e=2147483647&v=beta&t=jYPVi9mUnNezBX1xq1aXwlhNeP1p0_6lnPRRDm4lRBI

where its kind of Y shaped, but that's me just trying to fit their narrative rather than the info currently in the public domain.

That's why they need to get a new Investor Presentation out their ASAP, to educate everyone.

LOTM