Member Info for LOTM-13

Hi Bigw77,

Yes exactly.

There will be those out there trying to say the results are un-economic no matter what the 1st assay results actually are.

You have to remember that this is the 1st hole drilled & therefore its highly unlikely that the results it produces will be the best we'll see for Red Setter Dome its 99% certain there will be better results to come in the future from it & by all accounts the deeper they drill the better the grades should get re- Telfer & Havieron.

That's the reality of it, now how the share price reacts is a completely different kettle of fish, it might not see it that way at all, so you probably need to try & separate them! As people will have there own agenda's & act accordingly

LOTM

I know the Smart GPT-5 is a long read & most won't understand it, but its posted early for a reason.

It has been done well in advance of the actual data becoming available, its also telling everyone that the hole currently being drilled will most likely produce far better results for WSBN than the one we're awaiting assay results for.

So the doomsters won't be able to say its just been made up, its already been stated before a single assay result is known , good or bad, hole 2 should give us better results than hole one, if the geological interpretation of the data is correct.

GLA

LOTM

Last part - 5

Depth persistence:

Breccia continues well past 722 m with strong sulphides: You’ve likely threaded the core. That’s your best case for grade.

How to lock the geometry after this hole

Mark exact MDs: Dome contact, breccia start/end, and notable high‑sulphide veins.

Compute pierce‑point midpoints:

25RSDD001 breccia midpoint ~646 m MD (previous), new hole midpoint will shift; the line connecting midpoints approximates the pipe axis in plan view.

Axis plunge estimate:

Compare RL at the midpoints (or consistent internal marker like peak sulphide intensity) to get plunge direction/magnitude.

Third constraint (later):

A short infill hole 30–40 m further SW (or NE if needed) at the same depth band will fix the axis and give you a first‑pass radius/ellipse for the pipe.

----------------

If you want, give me the first two real‑time markers as they come in from the new hole — hinge contact MD and breccia start MD — and I’ll update the axis and hinge surface on the fly, with fresh predicted windows for where you should hit the pipe’s hottest core between 650–800 m.

GLA

LOTM

Part 4

Hinge–pipe relationship and structural inferences

Pipe cutting the hinge: The long breccia interval coincident with hinge arrival suggests the pipe exploits the hinge‑related fracture permeability. Your SW divergence tests whether the pipe sits on the hinge’s SW limb or on the hinge line itself.

If hinge shallows to SW and pipe thickens SW:

Inference: Structural culmination or local uplift to SW focusing fluids; pipe center tracks the hinge line.

If hinge deepens to SW but pipe thickens SW:

Inference: Pipe axis is independent of the hinge surface dip, possibly tapping a deeper feeder and cross‑cutting the hinge.

Real‑time diagnostics to call it early

At 520–560 m MD:

Hinge arrival: Vein density jump, change in alteration (silica–carbonate ± hematite), first sulphides.

If earlier than 520 m: hinge rises SW; if later than 550–560 m, hinge dips SW.

Within 570–700 m MD:

Textural shift: More matrix‑supported breccia and sulphide cement → you’re moving into the axis.

Modal sulphides: Rising chalcopyrite percentage, any bornite specks, magnetite increase → hotter center.

Quartz style: More continuous quartz–carbonate, thicker veins, and vein stockworks → core‑proximal.

Part 3

Similar entry but higher tenor (still on shoulder):

Why: The pipe could be elliptical with long axis along strike; a 75–100 m SW step might still be on the shoulder.

What to look for:

Entry near 560–585 m, thickness ~150–180 m.

Modest increase in chalcopyrite and vein density; texture still margin‑like.

Later entry/thinner interval (axis not SW):

Why: The pipe axis could lie NE or be oblique; your SW step would then advance away from the axis.

What to look for:

Entry >590 m, thickness

Part 2

If the new hole hits around the same depth (≈510–540 m MD):

Interpretation: The hinge is broadly planar across L1470 at that scale; the 30 m earlier‑than‑model result is systematic, not local.

Action: Keep projected intercepts between 520–550 m for future holes along strike.

If the new hole hits deeper (e.g., 560–600 m MD):

Interpretation: The hinge dips toward the SW or there’s a local down‑step (fault roll‑over), which also pushes the breccia downward SW.

Action: Expect the pipe to be deeper but potentially thicker if you’re moving toward its axis.

Tip: Record the exact hinge contact MD in the new hole; the ΔMD vs 520 m, combined with the ~72 m SW offset at that depth, directly constrains the hinge dip vector across L1470.

Breccia pipe expectations with a 75–100 m SW offset at 550–780 m

Earlier entry, thicker interval (most likely):

Why: 25RSDD001 intersected 570–722 m as a long breccia interval, visually consistent with a margin cut. Moving 75–100 m SW at the same depth band should track toward the pipe’s center if the axis trends SSW.

What to look for:

Start of breccia: potentially 540–565 m MD (earlier than 570 m).

End of breccia: later than 722 m; thickness >152 m.

Tenor: higher chalcopyrite proportion vs pyrite, denser quartz–carbonate veining, more sulphide cement in matrix-supported breccia, possibly more magnetite.

Conductivity: stronger conductor (lower resistivity) in downhole geophysics if available.

Multiple part post from Smart GPT-5 following https://www.linkedin.com/posts/upside-rebal-b350a7252_redsetter-newcrest-wsbn-activity-7366016690779787264-Tt-Y

Implications for the hinge and breccia pipe from the new trajectory

You’ve set a clear geometry: the new hole starts 20 m SW of 23RSRC001/25RSDD001 and diverges to 75 m SW by 550 m MD, i.e., plan‑view separation grows linearly with depth:

D(MD) = 20 + 0.1·MD m (so ≈77 m at 570 m, ≈85 m at 650 m, ≈92 m at 722 m, ≈98 m at 777 m)

This is exactly the sort of offset that can resolve whether 25RSDD001 hit the breccia margin and how the hinge surface is actually sitting.

Hinge surface constraints

Baseline contact: 25RSDD001 hit the hinge at 520 m MD. Your new hole is SW by ~72 m at that depth.

If the new hole hits the hinge shallower (e.g., 480–510 m MD):

Interpretation: The hinge rises toward the SW (structural uplift or steeper hinge dip to SW).

Action: Push more SW if you’re hunting the highest structural level of the dome; expect earlier entry into any pipe cutting the hinge.

Pictures from yesterday from https://x.com/DavidLenigas/status/1962718499366687205

At ALS core, show 22 of the trays (that would be tray from tray 83 nearest the camera back to tray 62 bottom right hand side) we can't see the tray numbers but the side of the 4th bottom one on the right clearly shows a figure starting with a 5 & the end number clearly starting with a 6.

Each tray covers approximately 4M of core so they were viewing from roughly 590M to 667.54M that is all of 77.54M

Note 520-590M is 70M! & you'd want to start viewing as a Geo pre the Red Setter Dome hinge at 520M to see the changes as they are happening.

18/08 RNS shows pictures of Tray's 63 (575.32-579.73 clearly shown) , Tray 70 ( ~605-610M but tray not marked), tray 73 (~ 619 - 623M not penned ) tray 75 (~ 627 - 632M not penned) the key tray of 78 (642-646M not penned) showing the inside of a core on the right hand side of figure 6. Plus trays 89 & 90 starting from 690.4M to around 699M.

21st Aug RNS shows us the cores of Trays 94 & 95 together 713 ~ 722M, which are the only full trays we get to see in that RNS, we get to see 7 bits of core close up over the 738.4 ~ 756M interval.

LOTM

More extremely good news on the APTA front I see :)

At some point soon APTA are going to have to start increasing the number of staff they have to cope with all this additional workload.

The APTA web of possibilities is expanding fast, they need to get the right people in the door to train them so as not to hit any road blocks that slow down the progress or product timelines etc or stop us taking on new work because we're too busy to cope with it.

Clearly we are on a lot of businesses radar's at the moment as Optimer's seem to be the solution they need to help there business.

LOTM

Hi Bogota,

I guess the X tweet is a hint that the gold content of the 1st hole is maybe higher than we might be expecting, since I've been expecting it to be more Copper prone than Telfer or Havieron are. Only time will tell.

LOTM

Sharebel,

Your obsessed about a share placing of 120M shares, lets put that in context shall we. there were 2,594,894,153 shares in issue prior to the recent 1.25p placing, so 120M shares is only a 4.62446% expansion on the number of shares in issue, in other words a tiny placing in % terms.

You along with virtually everyone else, have no idea who got the shares, so you can't prove they were flipped/forward sold or whatever else you want to call it, just the same as I can't prove they weren't.

However in the overall context of things it was a tiny % placing compared to many of the placing that take place.

There has been high volume for many days now, with people buying & selling for know doubt many reasons, especially if people got in near the bottom & decided to bank some profits or reduce there exposure.

LOTM

To help the cause I've just bought some OCN in my own name through Smart Investor & instructed them to vote NO to the resolution.

If your having difficult voting NO then I suggest you do the same, call up your online broker, make sure they can fill in the paperwork in time & get it delivered where it needs to go etc & if they can buy a few shares & tell them to vote NO.

Those who like to arbitrage should be buying OCN shares & doing the same thing, as you've got nothing to lose by doing so with plenty of upside potential possibly back to £15 a share if the merger fails to go through.

LOTM

Just topped up with 500,000 which is not showing up at 1.248p which will show up later with a time of 15:15 on it.

Back to doing what they were a week ago, hiding all trades of 500K or over for 1 hour or 2 hours.

GLA

LOTM

By the way, I wonder why they only had 22 trays of core on display for the Geo's today !

That's roughly 100M of core, out of the 257M we know there is!

LOTM

Hi Casper786,

You need to be very careful with your thinking regarding this Breccia Pipe etc.

I know my mind keeps wanting to think of it as a normal "round" pipe for water etc & that most likely that won't be the case!

While the hole encountered 152M of Breccia Pipe, I don't believe that is its diameter at all. Smart GPT-5 says the Breccia Pipe is dipping between 70 - 80 degree's in a SSW direction. The hole was drilled in that same SSW direction, so I'm pretty sure the Breccia Pipe is no where near as thick as 152M might not even be 100M in diameter.

How thick it turns out to be at hole 2 we will just have to wait & see but Smart GPT-5 believes they have moved in the right direction regarding targeting the centre of it.

Smart GPT also said the https://zenodo.org/records/13917889 data points to it be at least 1 KM in length! ie downwards.

By the way the Red Setter Dome is over 10km in length SE/NW & something like 3KM in width (that doesn't mean it will be all mineralised but a lot of possibilities lie within it, remember there are 3 deep faults that can be seen in the various pictures of it,

LOTM

Future Timeline -

Hole 2 should have set surface casing before 31st August at 150M.

If they are on double shifts it will take them approximately 10 days to reach a depth of 520-550M to hopefully intersect the Dome hinge as planned - that would be next Tuesday the 9th Sept, if things have gone to plan then by the Thursday we should know if they have hit the Breccia Pipe or not!

Smart GPT-5 has already told us all the things we should be looking for in the pictures they provide at that time!

LOTM

From earlier so it doesn't get lost

From smart GPT-5 viewing the X-Post

Visual interpretation

White quartz: Likely hydrothermal vein quartz, common in the breccia pipe and hinge‑zone veining. In Paterson‑style Au–Cu systems, quartz is often accompanied by carbonate and sulphide minerals.

Yellow/gold specks:

The brassy‑yellow metallic lustre is most consistent with chalcopyrite (CuFeS₂) or pyrite (FeS₂) rather than visible gold — though coarse visible gold can occur, it’s rarer and usually more malleable and richer yellow in tone.

Chalcopyrite in fresh core often has a richer golden hue than pyrite and may show slight iridescence (purples/greens) on fresh fracture surfaces.

Pyrite tends to be paler, more “straw‑yellow” and more cubic in habit.

Association: In the Red Setter breccia pipe, quartz–carbonate–chalcopyrite ± pyrite veining is exactly what’s been reported in the 570–722 m interval of 25RSDD001. The presence of sulphides in quartz veins is a strong vector toward mineralised fluid pathways.

🧠 Geological significance

Fluid pathway indicator: Quartz + chalcopyrite/pyrite is a classic signature of mineralising fluids in IOCG‑style systems.

Potential grade: Sulphide‑rich quartz veins can carry significant Au–Cu grades; the gold is often fine‑grained and locked within or along the margins of chalcopyrite/pyrite.

Vectoring: If this is from the breccia pipe interval, it supports the idea that the pipe is a vertically continuous feeder, and the SW step‑out could hit even richer zones toward the core.

LOTM

The ALS difference

ALS Core Services encompass core handling and warehouse management, core sawing, secure and comfortable logging facilities, core photography, and in-situ pXRF and spectral mineralogy analysis. In addition, ALS CoreViewer™ is a perpetual online archive of storage inventory, core box photos, and geochemical and mineralogical data.

Hyperspectral Imaging & Processing

ALS hosts TerraCore International's Core Imaging Spectrometers™ (CIS) in several major exploration regions. These instruments generate detailed hyperspectral mineral maps and high-resolution true colour images of drill core. The mineral map identifies a wide variety of fine grained and intermixed alteration minerals, while mineral spectral abundances and other statistics are compiled from the scan data. ALS CoreViewer™ allows cross-platform compatible viewing of detailed mineralogy and unprecedented investigation of your core.

Longwave infrared spectral imaging

TerraCore is the industry leader with commercially available long wave infrared (LWIR) spectral imaging as well as the standard visible near infrared (VNIR) and short-wave infrared (SWIR) spectral range to deliver the full spectrum required for rock characterisation.

Hyperspectral scans on crushed samples

For geochemistry-style sampling density, handheld mineral analysers like PANalytical's TerraSpec® 4 provide rapid, high-quality spectral acquisition.

LOTM

So they are at ALS core layout area!

If anyone with better IT skills than mine can perhaps get any of the names of those there from there badges ?

LOTM

More from Smart GPT-5 from knowing " in that tray the quartz section is between is 666-668M there are also 2 white quartz sections in the tray above between 661-662.5M"

From the reported logging on Red Setter’s 25RSDD001, these depths sit well inside the mineralised breccia pipe that starts around 570 m and continues past 720 m. This is the zone where the RNS noted “quartz–carbonate–chalcopyrite ± pyrite veining” with patchy sulphide dissemination.

🔍 Visual & geological take

661–662.5 m intervals

Likely narrow, high‑energy veinlets or stockwork quartz cutting the breccia matrix.

If you’re seeing brassy flecks here too, that’s consistent with chalcopyrite stringers along vein margins.

These short intercepts can be important — they often represent splays off a larger feeder vein, and in IOCG systems, gold can be concentrated in these narrower structures.

666–668 m interval

The more continuous quartz vein here suggests a more sustained fluid pulse.

The brassy‑yellow specks you noted are almost certainly chalcopyrite (possibly with minor pyrite), given the depth and association.

In Paterson‑style systems, this combination is a strong indicator of proximity to the core of the mineralising system.

If the quartz is milky to translucent with sharp vein margins and sulphides both disseminated and in streaks, it’s a textbook example of a mineralised feeder vein.

📈 Implications

Vectoring: These intercepts are in the “sweet spot” — mid‑pipe, where fluid flow was focused. If assays confirm elevated Cu and Au here, it strengthens the case for higher grades deeper or along strike.

Gold potential: Even if you don’t see coarse visible gold, fine‑grained Au can be locked in chalcopyrite or along quartz–sulphide boundaries. Fire assay or metallic screen will be needed to quantify it.

Follow‑up: If this vein set trends consistently in core orientation data, it could guide directional drilling toward thicker, higher‑grade shoots.

LOTM