Member Info for keeptofacts

joking aside, good luck today Freddy

just curious why you didn't go inside then seeing as the station is open way before the time you posted?

not really.
only of any use if they make a profit, which seems rather unlikely.

when I naiively tried long term investment on aim, I have come to the following conclusions.
1: long term rarely works on AIM
2: the purpose of being listed on aim is to raise cash - there WILL be a fundraise at some point.
3: many (most?) bods can't be trusted.
4: many (most?) posters on bbs are simply trying to move the sp. oddly, it does seem to work.

so, strategy now is, short term, between the fundraises and in line with the underlying bb sentiment.
NEVER believe in the story from the company.
most companies, with the obvious exception of val try to get a sp rise BEFORE they raise funds. if sp is rising and the company is short of cash, don't stay in too long!
question: why has val NEVER raised funds off the back of a rising sp, but ALLWAYS at the lowest possible point?

no problem

Pont, I have re read the rns and indeed you are correct and I was wrong.

obviously mean DEADLINE

THERE IS NO DREALINE!

all there is, is a preiod of exclusivity for the pottential buyer to look at things.
that's it!

meant scraping, but it nearly reads right anyway :)

that's a disgusting thing to write! (by Satu)
and indeed it is wrong!
gm once told me that for ANY trial patient wellbeing was paramount.
as such, measures are in pace to ensure trials are completed whatever happens to the company.
that is, stocks of drug are stockpiled and costs are pre paid to ensure the trial will complete.
as for further teatment, this can only be an issue IF the drug is approved for further trials and or clinical use.
if it were good enough for that it would be snapped up by another company, hence no issue.

they are really craping the barrel now!

Really?
based off total value of trades today of £280?

wow. that's some sell off!

remember is that the bod have nothing but contempt for shareholders. they genuinely consider us parasites trying to make money off THEIR work.
they of course fail to realise that without us they couldn't do what they do.
gm once told me that I had never contributed or helped the company at all!
for a well educated man he has some serious gaps in understanding.
just one example, they couldn't raise cash from 'mates' even at their usual huge discounts without mugs like us to buy up the shares, because sure as hell the ones 'helping' the company have no interest in keeping the shares!
the real question now is, are they stupid or has this all been planned?

before getting hung up on patents, might be worth reading this -> h t t p s://w w w.allbusiness.com/97-percent-of-all-patents-never-make-any-money-15258080-1.html

you seem to be trying to twist Maldini's post for some reason.
you say ->
" you are wrong in stating that Sound could have continued negotiations legally with other supposed bidders during the agreed exclusivity period.....- unless you do not trust the Sound Board to act on behalf of their Shareholders...……………… or within the law?"

BUT, Maldini's post very clearly says "even if SOU would not have been able to enter into any other negotiations during this period"

I'm no fan of the bod, but in this case the rns is straightforward.
they need a new venue (reason doesn't matter) there is not time to give the required notice therfore they will start at the old venue to satisfy notice period regulations and immediately adjourn to the new venue for the meeting.
hence, no opne can claim they weren't given enough notice of the new venue.

funniest thing I've read on here in months
"this is a personal post and is not sanctioned by SAG"
as if anyone would care or notice :)

I give up.

last word. why do you keep banging on about being poor? can't imagine anyone cares, just like they wouldn't care of you claimed to be rich.
why do you feel the need to get other people to make calls for you etc?
I don't smell a rat, but I do smell attention seeking.
for the record, been in val for many many years, don't trust the bod at all now. will not support any further consolidation.

if this "Someones trying to start me off again....I must not rise to the bait." is aimed at me, you must be seriously paranoid.

if it wasn't aimed at me, apologies, but please answer the 2 simple questions.

let me be clearer, as far as I can see no one on here is insulting you in any way.
questions
1: are you calling satu?
2: are you revealing all today? another day?

with all due respect Freddie, I find some of your posts a little hard to follow.
what happenbed to this intetion "I intend revealing all at 2.15, that is if we don't recieve a fair response...the games up."
it looks to me like an invitation to talk from satu is sufficient to cancel that resolve?
BUT, you want someone else to talk to her? why?

maybe I'm missunderstanding what you've posted?
genuinely confused