RE: Trellis20 Feb 2020 09:06
problem is what trellis has now done is guarantee that the only communication he will get from sound now will be the bare minimum and passed by legal first.
personally I would have said words along the line of 'we now have 10% plus, we don't want to have to call an egm, but will do if we don't receive a prompt repy to this mail' then include original; message content and give them the out of saying sorry we missed the original messages.
it SHOULD be about getting the response you want not about making a point.
unfortunately I think the whole sag thing has been set up to help trellis make a point for whatever reason.
the whole language in his posts shout 'look at mne I'm important' the constant going on about 9 countries (or whatever number it was) big deal, it's called the www for a reason.
the fact that this is the second time trellis has done this tells you more about his investment choices and motivation than it does about sound.
obviously I am not a member of sag (or am I? no one knows except me. maybe 1 million or so of those shares aren't real either?)