Member Info for keeptofacts

two points
1: I'm not talking about losing sidi. I'm saying if we were to default on the bond the ONLY secxurity is sound morocco south (sidi)
2: still no one can show the actual clause in the prospectus that allows the transfer of security from sidi to any other asset. if it's not in the prospectus it doesn't happen without agreement from all parties.

oh, this is all academic anyway as the bond is not due until june 2021.

let me get this straight.
you want PIs to buy and continue to buy until the sp is high enough for the bod to raise funds by diluting the very people who have bought?
are you clinically insane, or is this some sort of joke?

there 'may be' but I can't see any such clause in the bond prospectus.
if anyone can, including the odious poster dessaco, please post it here for all to see.

interestingly the bond (which is tradable) has increased in oprice today and is trqding above par.
h t t p s://www.bourse.lu/security/XS1434582885/241909
which doesn't look like a bond where the market has concerns

the prospectus is available at the same site.

I would like to see the details of how a debt secured on one asset can be transfered to be secured on another asset without the consent of both parties.

if I own two houses, one with a mortgage and another without and I stop payimng the mortgage, the lender can reposes the house that they have first charge over, but they can't touch the second house!
now, if the bond was secured agains 'sound energy assets', but it isn't because that would be crazy.

not trying to scare monger are you?
the bond is a fact. not payabale till summer 2021 and secured on sound energy south (sidi) NOT Tendrara.
hmm, do you think the bond holder might have a connection to existing BOD by any chance?
hint (Marco Fumagalli)
swiss and bahamian institutions taqlking to their lawyers? uttewr b0llox

the total SHARES is 4,911,864
the total VALUE is as I posted under £3k

really?

I see a total of 5 buys all day total value under £3k

please clarify this "The bond holders are already on a war footing"

thanks.

I suspect there won't be another meeting.

I agree with a lot you've said, but question the not going bust line.

please explain where the money is coming from for ongoing costs?
NO one will put serious money into this unless (and highly unlikely even then) they are given huge numbers of shares at a huge discount. and this can't happen unless shareholders agree. why would any lths agree EVEN if the two were removed?
it would still mean their investments became even more worthless.

they have no news to release, no deals, no meaningful patient stats and NO MONEY and no way to raise any.
put the light out on the way out the door.

all the doomsayers keep saying (hoping) the gas we have already FOUND is worth nothing.
anyone with 1/2 a brain can run the numbers and work out what the EXISTING find is worth to sound (or a buyer).
of course that doesn't fit their agenda which is all (and only) about blaming others for their own poor investment choices.

you will get the bare minimum response.
I suspect '201 is safe and well tolerated' as that's all they ever say in rns apart from to tell us of new shares being issued of course. :)

it's hardly going to be a hard sell at 100 million is it?
that would be OK for me (now) :)

btw, I agree this won't make the sp that was dreamt of, BUT it doesn't need to go up much for me to make a very signifiant profit.
so, not significant to you, but you post. very significant to me so I post.
hmmm, wonder which is more rational?

seems I'm not the one who needs to calm down.
hope that helps :)
have a good day.

if I didn't care, I wouldn't be posting on here.
I have better things to do than waste my life posting on a bb about a share I'm not interested in!

so you think the mms paid MORE for £100k worth of shares than they were wiling to pay for any other amount?
next largest sell was for a paltry 100k shares which got 1.462
seems unlikely to me.

next highest should read next largest