Member Info for JP2000

What is the evidence for gold? (genuine question)

They may have needed casing in which case they'd be looking to do DHEM periodically, both of which take extra time

@20m/day, yes but then another 2-3 days to get fully through and whatever to analyse

Are you saying the conductor was imaginary?

Is it that simple, it’s massive news one way or the other, the brokers, the board and possibly the lawyers will want to be absolutely sure about the wording.

The presentation and info was good, BT seemed a little robotic and tired, not the usual Zebedee.

Let's not forget KSZ area A assays and a week back BT said they were conducting DHEM which I'd assumed had failed. Ben was pretty bullish on area A because they found clear mineralisation despite just clipping the conductor.

Normally yes and a double shift

Is there a definition of "discovery" as wondering whether BT can potentially use the word or whether they'll need to wait 3 months for assays?

Cryptic retweet from Ben or just a buy mining stocks cos they're cheap?

https://twitter.com/Ben_Turney
https://twitter.com/goldsilver_pros/status/1486791124609994753

Thanks Keith. Graphite is sedimentary (?) and would have been detected in the geological hole and BT would surely have been ultra cautious. Nothing has been reported which is reassuring.

Keith: a couple of months ago there was a discussion about the B1 conductor and what else could it be if it wasn’t sulphides, you mentioned some research of a couple of examples of high conductance targets that turned out to be something else. I think the evidence is pointing towards massive sulphides but would you mind sharing your examples that didn’t work out.
Thank you.

Good luck but 100% is bonkers

I think it will stop at the planned TD 650m and the reason is the drill is angled north ie away from GRS and away from the feeder zone. Think of a book standing vertically at 60 degree angle, the drill was designed to hit the middle, to go through the thickness and then deeper so any DHEM can get a good look at the structure. One of the key things to look out for on the results other than Cu, Ni, PGE, Au(?) and any grades, is the true thickness of the structure which is a measure of deposition; a few meters thickness isn’t great, +10m commercial, 40-50m bonanza. I’m ignoring the feeder zone and GRS Proterozoic until they drill later in the year.

KCB is relatively shallow, forget the the type of drill but it produces rock samples not solid core.

KSZ will require a larger rig capable of at least 2000m and Ben has confirmed they have either secured or are getting a deep drilling rig.

One interesting takeaway is the DHEM at A2 is underway when I’d written that off assuming no news was bad news. Important because it helps to confirm conductors present and informs the positioning of the next area A drill.

Nailbiting week ahead with possible discovery ( repeat discovery!!) Thur/Fri, at the latest a week Monday. Will need to hear about true thickness which could be ànything 10-50m. B1 unlocks the KSZ.

I prefer the B1 with a feeder system open at depth theory. Is Ben hinting he wants to drill a 3000m hole $200/m fishing trip in the center of GRS? No thanks.

At the moment KAV needs to focus on near term discoveries.

These were not fact finding geological holes, they would have been high conductance targets i.e. the best prospects. The question is what were the conductance readings prior to the drill?

What does good look like for zinc? massive sulphides >5%

Look at the grades, rubbish results, SP now falling