RE: RNS: Chair buys £150k of discounted shares... thanks shorters!4 Dec 2025 17:23
For sure there will be more fun tomorrow. I was waiting for 125 for another run at it but maybe that will come tomorrow. I was fortunate enough to be watching TRST because of the past run on them and saw the drop to 170 over recent times and was hoping to see around 140 based on JPM continuing to sell off. From memory I think they were one of the buyers back when TRST was all the way down to 50/60p.
Not sure how long this could go on for as the ability for the BOD to answer quickly and honestly will be bound by client relationships and any wider implications around the restriction of triage tools/investigative validation of reviews, only to those who subscribe to their service. (If indeed that has taken place at all).
Fully read the Grizzly report and absorbed now. Kind of get where they are coming from and in previous life we had a bit of a run in with Trustpilot as a 'paying' customer and their review moderation. Anyway, that aside the other report I read was by typing in 'what percentage of reviews on trustpilot are fake?' and getting a 'Deep Research' report in copilot. (Coincidentally far better written than Grizzly ... american grammar I guess!). It's a balancing report between the two and the challenges and recent independent reviews this sector has has as well as the UK Digital Markets, Competition & Consumers Act (DMCCA, 2025) which I was not aware of. They have had The Guardan, AP News and Kwikchex look into them and this year, SafePaper. Clearly it covers the fake review issue.
As someone who on the most part will only bother with giving a bad review when aggrieved, I think that tends to be a trait of the human psyche for working people who don't have time on their hands. So really the example Grizzly uses of Vodafone is clearly valid. You'd expect all telecoms companies to fair badly! The grey and somewhat important areas are:
1. Is voda a paying customer
2. Is Voda the only one of those which goes through the process with tp to validate reviews and get fakes/unfair removed. Certainly big enough to bully TP into it if nothing else
What I imagine actually happens is that TP only run their AI and various systems to remove fakes, through reviews destined for paying customers. So the mafia pitch is that they only implement the triage tools on reviews for paying clients which means they loose the fakes and nonsense. So this becomes an issue and one which is easily resolved by assigning the reviewed company as a paying member or not. In fact, maybe they should have rolled that demand into the DCMAA consumer act this year.
Have a lot more to say on the matter but no-one is paying me! DYOR and put that wonderful AI to work. Another thing Ai kills off will be the publishing of part fact part fiction/guesswork to fit shorting narratives. Of course, when it's done well it can be the bastion of best practice and root out illicit corporate activity.