RE: For The Record6 Jan 2021 13:54
hi Hivedoff,
I understand your perspective, but I can't agree with you. I now only hold 110,000 of these because of all the nonsense that JD spouted in 2019, not because of anything anyone else said on here. If he'd only kept to the golden rule of 'under promise, over deliver', we'd all be in a different position. I have stated that I don't trust the guy because of all that, and I won't change my mind back easily; trust is like virginity, we all have it to start with, but when it's gone, well, it's gone.
That said, I have no intention of selling the remaining shares as I am in for free. I have always believed in the sector, I guess I just don't believe quite so much in BIDS now (hence the smaller holding). As for those saying all the "200p by 4pm" and "well done JD/BIDS" et al, please all remember my once oft-repeated stance............. "SHOW ME THE MONEY". Once we have the results RNS we will all be able to judge just where this SP should be. Until then, this is still firmly in the 'voting machine' territory (where all the risk is often found) and not the 'weighing machine' era (where the money is usually made).
Until then, any forgiveness on the part of JD is simply to early. if you don't believe me, here is a list of some of the actual risks facing the business:
1. lose code masters contracts - new owners have different ideas as to who they partner with.
2. JD didn't add 'significantly' into the update RNS, because it was marginal - and growth is not as frantic as the recent SP suggests.
3. BIDS is in a 'test' period with some of it's game providers, competing with it's rivals for exclusivity across the suite of titles and it is not selected for that exclusivity so loses titles. Or it does not win many new titles against the competition.
4. JD succumbs to the demon drink/COVID. I don't think this is a major risk, because I don't see him as vital anymore.
5. cash burn rate is not being dealt with and next cash call is larger than expected/dilution pains.
6. JD raises money any day soon, whilst the SP is high(er) - this is really only a short term SP risk, but you get my drift.
I completely understand that all or any of these reasons can work the other way around and boost the SP, but I am trying to highlight 'risk' that still exists. I'd rather these crept up at 5% per month over a few years than 10%-25% per day for a few months; it's just my experience telling me the former is more sustainable than the latter, in most cases, particularly when there is no data to pin the SP to.
So hopefully you don't all think I am being negative, because I am not; I am just keen to avoid the BB becoming a rampers haven just like in the summer of 2019 (which I was a part of, btw).
all the best
intrepid.