Member Info for in4cedros

Joe - I'd already pointed that out to dross during his Lindgate campaign but once his mind is set on something he's not up for sensible debate!

bigmj - it must be good as troll rossannan was super quick to dismiss it as ' rampy nonsense ' !

Countdemonet - IMO people here need to be pragmatic - LSE have their posting rules which won't stop trolls - ADVFN have a different system which can be more effective- those that wish should check it out - jcgswims thread is monitored by said poster and currently bans rossannan - the other thread is CERP hater 12bn's - pretty much anything goes there - I call it the nutters thread - all low life seemingly welcomed, including me!

Alternatively carry on here, robustly respond to trolls if you wish - readers of this board are used to trolls - they know that anything they post is intended to undermine sentiment and can normally be dismissed but occasionally there can be something useful in what's said - you are all grown ups - make up your own minds!

Countdemonet - but you are 'feeding ' him with your comments - seemingly unknowingly!

countedemonet - why are you stimulating troll rossannan to respond to you?

Joe - TVRgate for me was a neighbour who owned a very nice one but used to park close to my bedroom and start that V8 @ around 6:30 am and let it run until it warmed up before he drove off - we resolved the issue amicably.

Re Leo creating paper I believe he's bought good assets with it but the market has yet to reflect their value as the production evidence has not manifested itself - I don't blame the market but I'm comfortable with the position - could be some good pay from the South Erin 'Fully Loaded Compartment ' as well as Snowcap not to mention TI and Predator CO2 arrangement.

Trolls are getting rattled - Dross peeking at my posts now - desperation!

Dross - seriously why do you saturate the board with your trolling if you think it makes no difference - CO2gate, TropcalFloodgate, Placinggate, Lindgate and Leo'sCVgate!

LayLadyLay - very naughty there - blatantly taken out of context - shows troll desperation!

Dross - if you were to argue that LK could be clearer about expressing his plans for SWP drilling funding I don't believe many would have a problem with you posting, when you have something new to say, but if you were just trying to help out here you wouldn't have embarked on the recent negative campaign featuring CO2gate, TropicalFlood gate, LIndgate, Placinggate and LKCVgate.

I conclude you only want to attempt to lower the SP for your own personal gain and you are getting desperate because your strategic could easily fail as LK has the cash for the first drill - if that proves successful he will be able to choose, from a position of strength, how to fund subsequent drills, bearing in mind that overall production could well be circa 1500 bopd by that time.

If the drill is not as successful as hoped LK still has a viable business with diversified production sources to fall back on to plan the next step. This has moved from Shyte or bust to a calculated speculation - if you don't have confidence in LK or the drilling you may be able buy cheaper in 6 months time but if there is reasonable success this will be out of your range Dross!

Dross - early days to poo your pants about funding - still plenty in the bank to fund a drill and time until commencement - are you worried that if the pre drill excitement takes over you will lose your cheap buy in opportunity - you do sound increasingly desperate lately with Weathergate, Lindgate, ForcedProductiongate and CVgate - what's next on the agitate list!

Dross - Sounds like sour grapes to me - Dan combines style with substance - main benefit though is only need to read it once for impact - unlike your posts - which seem to be on permanent loop!

Dross - I can see why the article doesn't fit your agenda - Dan obviously not impressed by your recent take on Leo's CV.

Tell us again why you chose to come up with that theory now when people could be excused for thinking LK was the O&G equivalent of Bill Gates from your saturation ramping for months when he first took over!

neon - thanks for posting that one Dan ***** ( a non shareholder ) has IMO assessed the company very well and as a bonus for Irene has repeated the Goudron target of 3000 bopd that she wanted sourcing a few weeks ago. Dan also doesn't seem to find the connection between SWP and offshore assets in the locality in any way implausible - I think this is something all our trolls struggle with ( just to remind Irene Soldado North 15000 bopd average over 50 years !).

I'm thinking of screen printing the article and putting it above my bed!

Dross - you've summarised your attitude to this share - if you're not happy with the risk/reward scenario here that's your prerogative - no one forcing you to invest here.

The fact you spend so much time on here trying to persuade others you are correct is bizarre and would ring alarm bells with any onlooker about your real motivation. If those onlookers then consider the desperate lengths you go to deramp this share and how disingenuous you have been proved to be over almost every issue you raise they will almost certainly conclude that you are an insult to the intelligence of readers here!

Dross - according to you POO is languishing yet it is higher than when LK took over and it wasn't a problem for you then as it suited your massive rampathon!,

LK appeared to have no problems obtaining loan finance on good terms and did a good deal with Schroders for the introduction of their substantial holding - others have subsequently volunteered Placing money which he's taken. Evidence so far is that his charm and experience has benefited CERP I'm certainly not guaranteeing that will always be the case but to introduce doubts about his entrepreneurial skills now just to suit your trading position is certainly a huge further challenge of your own credibility which is exceptionally low currently IMO!

LayLadyLay - chutes appears to have bought in with eye wide open to the history - thanks for bringing it to my attention, might have to recycle that if Ross wants to go with the line that PIs swallowed Ross's fervent ramping of LK in the honeymoon period!

Bamps - LK now has Institutions and industry professionals to keep satisfied which IMO is a good thing - I doubt he's bothered what the troll is attempting to suggest - different matter if he was a failure historically!

Irene - you could learn a bit from Ross - he's figured, eventually, same old saturation tosh just gets him filtered by more and moe people - even if the 'new ' stuff is Shyte regarding conclusions at least it's less boring than the old !

desertjoe - I liked that one - timing not lost on me either!

LayLadyLay - On the contrary I'm happy for trolls to post on here but they shouldn't be shy to say what their motivation for posting is - MP's are elected on a manifesto and are paid from the public purse - most onlookers understand political bias in their comments.

If you have a financial interest in seeing the SP lower why be shy to say so - it is presumed that tampers are shareholders.

Troll 12bn claims to have no financial interest in CERP - has set up his own thread to deramp and posts misleading information. Troll rossannan says he's out but claims he would buy back at a lower price - there are many like him but few who saturate a board with disingenuous bile in an attempt to achieve it. Then there's you - why not explain why you post?