Member Info for in4cedros

Dross - Leo's in charge - he's told us the plan and he's told us there's over $2 million in the bank for that first drill - interesting that your pre Christmas posting was hour after hour about cash burn and how CERP couldn't afford to drill without the Lind loan - since then Leo has put on over 300 bopd of 'new ' production and is claiming ALL GROUP COSTS COVERED in Q1 2019 - drilling of the ' Fully Loaded Compartment ' on South Erin is imminent.

I know it's difficult for Trolls but you can't rely on Goebbels repitition to prove your case - evidence is preferred by most!

LGO-fan - you have probably seen me posting historically about the art of Trolling and the fact that ours are pretty woeful on here. The first chapter of Trolling For Dummies does warn about not saying too much and resisting temptation to explain yourself!

rossannan clearly isn't too retentive as he's forgotten the advice and said too much!

In his post to you 13:20 he states ' With WTI a little firmer and the SWP supposedly just over the horizon, there is a clear opportunity for a speculative rinse and repeat if LK would just come clean over the funding the SWP. That is what I am waiting for rather than any particular price.'

rossannan wants everyone to believe the SWP funding is unclear and is using the Goebbels repetition method to prove it's a fact, despite LK spelling it out, but leaving that to one side if rossannan is not bothered about the SP why embark on the campaign to undermine LK as detailed in my litany of ' gates ' - methinks one doth smell a rat here!

I must admit I have misunderstood Troll rossannan as I thought he was just trying to undermine the SP so he could get a better entry price - not something I applaud but at least it makes sense - but now rossannan is joining the LayLadyLay camp of just posting negatively for personal trolling gratification - forget this warning newbies argument- who would give up their time to try and stop new people ( they don't know from Adam ) buying in to cause financial detriment to shareholders ( who they also don't know from Adam ) - they might hate me but how can they be sure the newbie they've put off is not a worse character than me !

Troll Irene has made the point that most shareholders on Petersalkeld's list are under water - why are they seemingly so keen to stop the SP from moving up - what have they got against those shareholders- some of which may have been bought when rossannan was ramping the Shyte out of CERP.

Some might say there are elements of a moral maze out there but I believe it's just attempted psychological manipulation for financial gain - poorly executed by these Trolls !

LayLadyLay - I know you are feeling sorry for rossannan but sometimes people are too stupid to take the hint - posting the Goebbels quote in full to give him a heads up ( because he filters me ) about what I'm saying about him clearly went over his head as he's still on and on and on about funding for SWP believing repeating it makes it a fact!

Oddly though rossannan appears to accept the potential in the SWP whereas you have yet to make that leap! How are you getting on with the CO2 research from Predator?

Dross - luvin your quote ' One of my favourites is this idea that skeptical posters are trying to talk the share price down to their chosen entry level. Just think for a moment what a delusional mindset that would be ' - wish you'd told me that before posting schoolboyerrorgate, C02gate, TropcalFloodgate, Placinggate, Lindgate, Leo'sCVgate, Outliergate and Punishmentgate - if I'd have realised they were all ramps I'd have been up in arms protesting you were running your propaganda like a military campaign to spike newbies!

That’s why they’re called Trolls but they don’t seem to like that characterisation - not even competent trolls as when probed they can’t back up their mileading scenarios!

Irene - I’m not surprised you copped out but I’m a little disappointed as I find that when Trolls actually attempt to justify their position they usually drop some great sound bites I can recycle in the future - why would you hold the view expressed in your post to Perkins yet post on another occasion LEO AND HIS COLLEAGUES ARE AN IMPRESSIVE TEAM!

Irene - as I'm the only poster you've ever filtered I presume you didn't answer cperkin's question because you found it too challenging - how about an easier one for you - tell him why you stated ' LEO AND HIS COLLEAGUES ARE AN IMPRESSIVE TEAM ' !

LayLadyLay - just genuinely worried for her and anyone else with a Post Office Book attitude to risk getting involved here especially when they talk tosh. Presumably you’d agree with me that if they don’t have a financial adviser they should get on the Government sponsored Money Advice Site to assess their attitude to risk ( free of charge BTW - taxpayers have paid for it! ). As you know I have also given Offerman and others the same advice - people should be comfortable with their investments.

Regarding the film it had passed me by but the synopsis looked interesting - is it worth a full viewing - sometimes I get a window of opportunity, when I’m not watching Leo or Paul from Predator - how are you getting on with that one?

Garnhiem - BTW for a moment there my odds went haywire - rxdav said he was reducing his posting and you were a nats’ away from the rossannan filter button - I think he realises the severity of the credibility gap when normal people don’t want to talk to him!

Irene - perhaps he’s just read the Company information rather than relying on fairy stories - wasn’t it you that said CERP needed 2000 bopd to cover costs - either LK is on a bonanza roll or your assessment of financials is woeful as the last rns claims ALL GROUP COSTS COVERED in Q1 2019!

Dross - I’ve heard what FOMO does to people - are Irene and yourself comparing notes?

Garnhiem - you need to give him a bit more time as he’s suddenly developed a keen interest in CO2 now that Ross has dropped the bat and I’ve given him a special assignment to watch a Predator video.

Irene - I’ve just had the writers of ‘Carry on Banking ‘ on asking me if they can use the last line of my post !

Irene - looks like he’s an experienced poster why not ask him if he knows of any high growth potential O&G stocks with a guarantee that you won’t lose any money - there’s no shame in being satisfied with a Post Office Book!

LayLadyLay - may I say how impressed I am you are quoting from Krishna Persad - he was, of course, a substantial technical contributor to the 'speculaterblogspot ' which made a well argued case for deep drilling on the SWP - Troll Ross will pretty much say anything WITH SUFFICIENT REPETITION to attempt to PROVE he's right but I've still got hopes that you can make a reasonable contribution to this board.

LayLadyLay - Predator have given an indication for total capital cost and have told us that CO2 is so cheap in Trinidad it was a marriage made in heaven!

May I recommend you watch the video of the presentation Paul gave to the conference - he was very fulsome with figures and ran out of time but I believe the slides tell all then you can report back to us with the details.

Interesting that management own 55% of Predator so plenty of incentive to make it work - Paul certainly very enthusiastic about it!

Dross - luvin the choice - vud u like your left or right testicle shot away - neither thanks! - keep it up though Goebbels would be proud of you ' it would not be impossible to PROVE with SUFFICIENT REPETITION and a psychological understanding of the people concerned that a square is in fact a circle.'

rxdav - no chance of a Ross Reich including me - interesting quote below from Joseph Goebbels :-

'It would not be impossible to PROVE with SUFFICIENT REPETITION and a psychological understanding of the people concerned that a square is in fact a circle. They are mere words and words can be molded until they clothe ideas and disguise.'

Dross - perhaps LK is keen to remain friendly to shareholders by not having a Placing and this won't result in being forced into a giveaway partnership.

Your views are not those of the company and you have no evidence for them - just repeating same old tosh only makes YOU believe it because you've filtered anyone that disagrees with you and most of the rest have filtered you!

rxdav - re my post of 06:18 these are just recent examples - I certainly accept that most of his posts have a foundation which can be interpreted in different ways but unfortunately I find the disenguity disagreeable and point that out when I have the time - can be tedious for readers as disproving statements usually necessitates considerable detail and clogs the board but most people are aware of the need to consider his views with great caution and for me that's a result!

I don't ask anyone on a chat board to join any camps readers should consider each new issue and comment accordingly- shareholder and non shareholder bias is pretty much inevitable - then there are Trolls!