My take on this11 Jul 2025 09:39
Obviously Huddled have not managed to reach the long touted tipping point into profitability, or they would have shouted it from the rooftops prior to accepting a paltry £1.5 million to dilute the shares. If that’s not the case, then why no update prior to accepting ?
If they were doing well, they wouldn’t have needed to raise anything.
I’m not convinced that speed of delivery is going to make such a huge difference to their performance, and Higginson is obviously convinced otherwise.
To me ,it appears akin to a bank loan , and Higginson has managed to convince the banker that all will be great and that the new tie up will be transformational .
If I was his bank manager, he would get a firm NO , as his recent business history doesn’t read very well
Looking again at the last RNS, it was stated that there will be no change in warehouse costs ( Which I find odd )
The recent departure of a couple of board members maybe suggests that all is not a bed of roses in camp Huddled.
Regarding Immotion, all seems to be going well and no doubt the new owners are happy with the recurring income stream. There were a few murmers at the time questioning who actually ended up as the new owners (I.e were any of them part of the concert party ?), but Higginson stated that this wasn’t the case.
All in all, it’s getting pretty frustrating with yet more talk of Jam tomorrow .