RE: Granto7 Oct 2016 13:08
The transfer from 62 to 65 pellets will balance out the slight drop in production when it comes to accounts, so this will remain broadly in line with most analysts figures so most traders won't adjust to compensate. The phasing out of 62 pellets is a good move with the desire for quality becoming more and more in favor especially in China. The arrival of new iron ore in 2017 will force the closure of high cost low quality producers. This will in itself reduce the supply in the market. so next year, as low cost production enters the market, if it forces the price down, it will also force some huh cost miners out of business, thus reducing supply, and ultimately the price will edge back up due to the supply being reduced. So, I see something of a stable supply, albeit the new supply of low cost ore replacing high cost ore, and the supply staying somewhat similar. but lets be frank, supply will and should rise, but not without losing some of the high cost producers production. As for pellets? The price of pellets tracks ore basic spot price, with the premium added. But coking coal prices has a massive impact on this too. If coking coal stays at sky high prices, the shell plants will shell out serious money for pellets. and China has said it will not assist the coking coal industry, it is making things hard for them because of smog and the environment. China wants more pellets used. This in turn is forcing the low cost steel makers who don't use pellets into bankruptcy and their production moving into the pellet using larger professional shell plants, that use pellets in great numbers. So the demand for pellets will remain very strong in China, and so will the premium. The other pellet markets are all nice and stable and Ferrexpo has a finger in every market so the geographic risk is spread. it is looking very solid for Ferrexpo and give this 6 months and a fine set of Y12 accounts with $400m profits and the grey suits will return.