Member Info for Gitfinger

PS. Only one Git…..no former alter egos or pseudonyms for me, unlike some, hey BB?

Alt (AKA fanboy)
So no details on the Lanstead deal…..oh, of course not, that’s a hard undeniable fact that you can’t waffle away from….
I’ll tell you what, you set down a single meaningful critical success factor that you expect the company to hit by 31/01/23 and see whether it’s achieved. Pin your colours to the mast dear boy, and get off the fence….by the way, I didn’t start the comment about someone being a porker, you just assumed this because it suits your anti Git agenda…..funny how no one else is as anti Git as you, what’s your problem, is it that I keep asking for facts that don’t support your agenda? Talking of which, any news on why the accounts were late…
PS. Has the nice prince given you the $23M that he was going to send you, or has he asked for another £500 in order to get another export licence? You are clearly in denial and showing all the signs of someone whose been caught up in a 419 scam….

Alt
So what were the terms of the deal, and how did the company do well out of it then sunbeam. Typical response from the apologist in chief, vague positive comments with no substance and when pressed resorts to petty “schoolboy” “poison” and “basher taunts”…..try coming up with some actual facts to support your arguments matey…oh, there aren’t any, are there…
Hands up, I’m a sceptic, but haven’t you ever heard of the phrase “healthy scepticism”?…..what isn’t healthy is taking such a skewed view of a situation that you defend what is, until proven otherwise, the indefensible with a complete inability to back up anything you say with actual facts.
Get it into your head. We are all here for the same reason, to make money out of this stock, and the only way we can do this is to see it rise and that can only be achieved as a result so actual, defined and proven performance, do you not think that the market has a handle on this stock, and its price reflects where the company actually is? Oh, no, of course your rose tinted view is far more accurate than the whole of the market…you are so so desperate for this to succeed, I would hazard a guess that your sat on a massive loss and are in denial….at least Garonne is openly bitter and twisted

Reonin
A bit harsh, but I like the cut of your gib…..just a bit upset that you appeared to confuse me with the arch sycophant! (Maybe I should have issued an irony / sarcasm alert first)
Talking of which, the fanboy now seems to have reverted to paying homage to the fabled lanstead deal as some kind of justification for who knows what….just to refresh my memory, what precisely were the terms of the lanstead deal; I seem to recall that some regarded it as toxic at the time, but I wouldn’t know because I was obviously at school (probably learning about lenses, or companies act filing deadlines, or something)…..

PS. My projects are self funded, who funds yours then? Oh, probably the taxpayer……

Alt
Nope, I have no buttons…..I don’t have a job either, that implies employee status…….I am not reliant on the handouts of others, and can waste as much time as I want de bunking the rampers…..
so why the late accounts submission then? Answers on a post card please…..

ReoninV
How very dare you upset the apple cart!
Alt / bumble / Brian is likely to throw a hissy fit and get all uppity about it and either change his name, or create another sidekick to reinforce his “la la la…. I can’t hear you / next year we’ll be miwwionaires wodney” messaging which is all designed to create a false sense of hope to the uninitiated…..

Alt
So you know all about physics then……. Tell me why the account were submitted late then boyo….as for knowing about stuff optical I probably know more about high refractive index lenses and low visual aids than you will ever know, so try not to be such a hair splitting smart ****….
I like your comment on the lanstead deal, another word for what he’s well known for is bull****….apologist in chief……

Not keen on running shorts myself, more of a lederhosen type thing floats my boat.....

Statutory companies Act filing deadline is 6 Months after the end of the year for filing annual accounts. FCA and AIM require that the 6 monthly report is published within three months, so therefore the company has a little wriggle room yet to pull something out of the bag, which is eminently sensible as it could then be included in the annual report as a Post balance Sheet Event......interestingly the 31/10/21 accounts were filed at Companies House on 30/05/2022, which is a month late......No doubt Alt will have a very very good reason for this being the case, probably something to do the refractive index of the lens in the scanner, or some such twaddle......

Alt
Investor / poster, who really cares about the difference other than you, the arch hair splitting pedant. Sentiment is the same and your comment is invalid either way. My button not pressed, I can do this all day long, it takes me no effort, but boy, do you have to work in order to get your spin to work…. So when’s Pommygit going to chip in then?

Alt
So who is the relatively new poster I’ve been picking on? This wouldn’t be the on I’ve sparred with regularly in the past, who has always been able to adequately defend himself without the assistance of mister white knight saviour?
Your attempts at trying to claim the moral high ground are transparent and risible…

Alt
“and does not compare with what was on view to those that bothered to attend the AGM. Honestly, you guys are sad individuals”
Really? How sad is it that you saw fit to invest a day travelling to listen to captain choccy bar preach to the converted….my day was spent far more productively….

Alt
Pray tell me why it’s dim to highlight the fact that yet again, you simply cannot let any criticism of the messiah whatsoever whether valid or not, go without some kind of sycophantic defence from the apologist in chief….
I’m well aware of the way lenses work, and how images can be distorted, but that’s precisely what you do with your undying need to defend someone who is incredibly well rewarded for what, at this moment in time appears to be a singular lack of performance.
Calling someone “dim” implies you are claiming the intellectual high ground….pray tell what evidence supports this stance….

Alt
Well that absolutely takes the apologist biscuit! (on reflection, a bad choice of words because AB has probably already had the biscuit!) You cannot even bear the thought that someone might be a little bit critical of the bloke turning into a bloater, and have suggested that it might all be the fault of a bleedin lens.... with this level of sycophantic defence, you can see why he could get the impression that AFC is is own personal fiefdom.....

So granny leaving you a house didn't have anything to do with being mortgage free at 32 then?

Jim
Thanks for the advice, but honestly don’t worry about me, it only takes a few seconds to press a few buttons.
Don’t worry about me wasting my time either; the team has been undertaking the viability study on the battery off grid solution for some time, and we are fully costed and ready to commission. Problem is, we really need AFC to release its performance and cost data so that we can go to market with a known cost advantage.
As a special concession to the festive season, I’ll stop pressing buttons until the new year….huge sigh of relief from you and alt….

Maybe, just maybe, we might one day get an idea of the cost per KWh out of the power tower, taking into account the cost of the fuel, maintenance, amortisation of the R&D costs and caped of the actual unit. Until we get this useful information, no such comparison can ever be calculated. That’s the whole problem, no performance data, no cost data, and no indication of capital cost. Get me this information, and I’ll give you a fully costed comparison on a like or like performance basis. Until then, let’s just hoping that someone has the appetite for the chocolate teapot of power…..

Haggis
It's only called "product range" when there's actually a product available. As at this precise point in time, there are only proto products out there on test with potential customers who (ABB notwithstanding) have no commitment to purchase at the end of the trial period.
What seems to be forgotten here is that the market that the company is seeking to enter into does not, by its very nature usually commission bespoke solutions to energy requirements, it is generally an off the shelf purchase, and as such, if the load capability is known, the fuel consumption is known, and the cost is known, then assuming that these are all within comparitor products, then it should be an easy sell, and these performance metrics should have been benchmarked, calibrated, and documented even before contact was made with any of the proto customers.....Unless, of course, the product isn't sales ready, in which case we have all been spun a line by the company potentially to our detriment.

Klunk
I like the Fiat Panda analogy and I fully agree. The question really is whether someone who needs an uninterrupted 10KW supply for 8 hours a day, 5 days a week would invest in a Power Tower (which brings with it the questions "where do we get the fuel from?" "who maintains it?" "what is it going to cost?") in order to achieve this, or simply enter into an agreement to provide 400KWh battery pack which can either be how swapped on a weekly basis, or even recharged on site?
As for scalability, battery packs can be scaled up similarly without so many of the complexities / pitfalls that go with multiple cell units that would need to go into a bespoke scaled up FC unit.