RE: RNS20 Oct 2023 12:13
BBN
to respond to your yesterday "But you've been told today that TGR is producing at 40-45 tons per day. So my question to you is why are you ignoring that? Because that substantially affects cash flows now and going forward."
MB. But i don't want to extrapolate. Others here are doing the same. Already past extrapolations are undermined by the head grade reduction, who knows what else might undermine further ones?
If the co is confident t of the cash flows you posit, then let's hear it....FROM THE CO.
Many here seem happy to continue extrapolating in the face of all that has happened. I wanna see the co say it, in print, what is their cash position, and cash projection, for the next few months? But they won't tell us.
Already the assertions in prev RNSs re supplier advances being sufficient are undermined in the latest RNS by alluding to ie, part of the proposed debt finance for unbudgeted capex being used for "working capital", ie, ST cash.
I can understand why many of the faithful here don't want to focus on the downside, but it's staring us in the face. Until this cashflow is sorted, financed, and out in the open, SP will continue to drift, and with it, the co's bargaining power in securing that finance.
It is quite clear the co has failed spectacularly to accurately forecast cashflow ; a smallish raise 6 to 9 months ago at 30p + would have saved much of the subsequent SP damage.
It's a really unforgiving mkt atm, debt finance will be costly, and I suspect may come with an unhealthy dose of convos, warrants, or optiions.