RE: :( 220 Dec 2024 21:56
This is tyring. But on the settlement issue I may as well address for completeness.
1. The fact india engaged is positive, if they thought it was BS they would ignore like many other governments do.
2. We are dealing with india and politicians. Would you voluntarily hand out 400m usd without even a court case ( big nuts if you do). Or would you start to talk, wait for a huge claim say 1bn usd and settle it for less, blaming the prior guy, looking like a hero for averting a crisis while pointing to the fact you already have 120m in prepayments so basically it cost you F&&&* all to remove the issue.
If the negotiation happened, that explains why NOA was delayed. The CEO is not an idiot, there must have been something of interest or he would not have spent 2 mins on it