Member Info for eskibeatbeater

We went through all this for hours and hours one night. He is a straight up liar as Dive confirms. 90% of his posts are merely repeating this about DCUs the other part filled with abuse or fantasies.

Anyway, I have checked in to wish all good luck and all the best. This will now go onto deep freeze for me until we may have to convene again if we do not get DCUs paid out as and when they should. Also recommend you check the hurricane/prax website and read the dcu detailing they have uploaded.

As pig ignorant as asi

That message above is you all over. Thinking you have won when you haven't. Thinking you have provided value while neglecting the fundamentals the discussion was about. Skirting the actual point. You avoided declaring the obvious regarding kever.

This is my last message until tomorrow. You may claim/or believe i'm backed in a corner but I'm simply just out of time. If I had all the time in the world, I would carry on. You still can't even acknowledge the fact that someone is telling people how to vote and supplying false un-quantifiable information.

I'm not abusing you because I'm backed into a corner. I'm calling a spade a spade because for all what may be true with what you said. You can't concede that the poster inquestion is influencing and unable to provide proof on their claims.

Essentially you are calling out the voice of reason. The one that asks for proof and to stop influencing.

So you againare a manipulator supporting such practises but against those that call it out?

By all means, we will carry this on tomorrow.

Ever the manipulator. I stated what I have seen and you in essence tell me I'm lying. On what basis do you know that? I'm not a Mr fantasy helicopter rider, 8 company director and overall bs'er like you that can spend his entire day policing a bulletin board of a stock he has no involvement in. Telling people he should call others out but can't once concede that the poster in question hasn't backed up his claim and is offering financial advice in which direction to vote and to think, i actually thought you provided value.

Your just entirely self righteous and in every way was sense and Co right about you.

I can't be bothered to carry this on with you with such short time.

All the best.

Its merely a request on their already open offer.

I haven't the time to read back through endless posts. It's currently 6am here and I need to work in two hours with zero sleep as it stands, no fault of anyone before you claim im blaming the bb. My commitment here therefore is the most I can give. I tend to scour the most recent posts. Claiming the above is factually incorrect, again you trying to control the narrative in an almost manipulative way.

So me asking a user to upload rather than email as offered (for privacy) is me telling someone what to do?

Because ultimately, I requested humility and to recieve the offer to provide the proof of which others claim. I can only call on what I personally have witnessed/read.

So what are you saying? I shouldn't ask those that offer proof to provide it? Also, I shouldn't merely state vote either way? If so, what has what you have stated above, got any relevance to me?

Sometimes, i think you like to comment and quote to feel big about yourself regardless ofnits relevance.

......

Because I haven't seen those posts? I am not here 24/7 due to other commitments. Had I of seen or witnessed, then i would. But I can only call on what I have seen. Ultimately you infer I am telling people what to do. I'm only calling out those that are factually doing so and that of which I have witnessed doing so. But you are calling me out for doing so? On what basis?

Interesting how you threaten/allay that I have broken rules above yet when it comes to those saying vote yes, you gloss over it. Classic asimple.

Hold on a second. What relevance does that have to me? What others say, is not what I said? Now, you are holding me responsible for what others have said? My point has been stable throughout. I have not persuaded anyone to do anything vote wise but have humility in your decision.
Have you seen me say vote no? So why direct such constant shpil at me?

You have tried to contradict me, as a bully, in numerous ways in the last 20 minutes but none hold substance as irs irrelevant to me?

If you were remotely fair, you would judge on what I said and provide relevant comments.

I have never ever once told people what or how to vote but merely to vote. Yes, I have also asked those throwing claims to merely back their claims of 'proof' regarding the ISA issues which was offered but yet forthcoming. It seems you are purposely skirting that however.

Asimple, as per previous, everyone had the right to vote as they desire. I will not and can not make or persuade otherwise. That is never my intention. However I don't believe it needs constant posts of vote yes and trying to goad members. Their opinion is clear but they can't seem to leave it at that? More so, it's actually providing financial advice and trying to persuade members to vote in a certain direction. However, I'm sure you will percieve it differently wnd tell me that it's not.

We can keep on going round and round. At this juncture, its almost irrelevant now. Voting has lapsed bar appearance. Broom and Kever have made their point and stance clear. Yes vote. Which is absolutely fine. I'm not a dictator. I just think a tad humility is required now. Why keep trying to further rub and push the board when 98% are against? It's clear our views do not align and therefore, stop posting vote yes, blah blah blah. It unnecessary and surely even a fickle man like you can acknowledge that?

Asimple, playing on forum technicalities is pretty weak. The link is there, the offer to provide information was made but never forthcoming. If it exists, and it was offered, provide it? Surely?
As you are aware, a url or unlink is not prohibited.

A petulant infant would only use the filter button mid discussion. I'm not defending merely myself, but the others with the same view but maybe in a different scenario - regardless of above or below, we view this as worth more and defend are reasoning for that. You have nothing to defend, it's a yes for you. So why keep touting?

Have you forgot this is AIM? Hence the corruption stopped by the judge? Stop throwing around absolute tripe in attempt to silence people. There is no recourse here, clearly and I haven't breached or allayed anything that's not known and perceived as factual by the masses.

All are welcome, i never stated other, yet only one kept claiming to be able to be ready to provide such proof, shouldnt they be taken up on such if offered? Yet they can't seem to do it? Why?