RE: director dealing1 May 2023 02:53
Asimple, don't give it that. They do not hold skin in the game. Their holding prior to share splitting (which we know how that shoul viewed as by the judge) that they held merely token distractions. Never invested.
Suddenly, they are interested and tried decided to buy, yet, not under their own names.
This, in mine and others views will be perceived by the judge for what it is... manipulation.
As someone I once perceived as informative and reasonable, im surprised you tried to play that card.
You previously declared you are against the deal, but, it really doesn't seem so when you try to justify illegal moves.