Gordon Stein, CFO of CleanTech Lithium, explains why CTL acquired the 23 Laguna Verde licenses. Watch the video here.
Asimple, as per previous, everyone had the right to vote as they desire. I will not and can not make or persuade otherwise. That is never my intention. However I don't believe it needs constant posts of vote yes and trying to goad members. Their opinion is clear but they can't seem to leave it at that? More so, it's actually providing financial advice and trying to persuade members to vote in a certain direction. However, I'm sure you will percieve it differently wnd tell me that it's not.
We can keep on going round and round. At this juncture, its almost irrelevant now. Voting has lapsed bar appearance. Broom and Kever have made their point and stance clear. Yes vote. Which is absolutely fine. I'm not a dictator. I just think a tad humility is required now. Why keep trying to further rub and push the board when 98% are against? It's clear our views do not align and therefore, stop posting vote yes, blah blah blah. It unnecessary and surely even a fickle man like you can acknowledge that?
Asimple, playing on forum technicalities is pretty weak. The link is there, the offer to provide information was made but never forthcoming. If it exists, and it was offered, provide it? Surely?
As you are aware, a url or unlink is not prohibited.
A petulant infant would only use the filter button mid discussion. I'm not defending merely myself, but the others with the same view but maybe in a different scenario - regardless of above or below, we view this as worth more and defend are reasoning for that. You have nothing to defend, it's a yes for you. So why keep touting?
Have you forgot this is AIM? Hence the corruption stopped by the judge? Stop throwing around absolute tripe in attempt to silence people. There is no recourse here, clearly and I haven't breached or allayed anything that's not known and perceived as factual by the masses.
All are welcome, i never stated other, yet only one kept claiming to be able to be ready to provide such proof, shouldnt they be taken up on such if offered? Yet they can't seem to do it? Why?
Should be viewed as*
Mere distributions**
Decided to buy now under other affiliated names (shate splitting)***
Asimple, don't give it that. They do not hold skin in the game. Their holding prior to share splitting (which we know how that shoul viewed as by the judge) that they held merely token distractions. Never invested.
Suddenly, they are interested and tried decided to buy, yet, not under their own names.
This, in mine and others views will be perceived by the judge for what it is... manipulation.
As someone I once perceived as informative and reasonable, im surprised you tried to play that card.
You previously declared you are against the deal, but, it really doesn't seem so when you try to justify illegal moves.
It's very sus how two individuals, one which has not even posted any proof of his response recieved from HL via the upload link which takes less than 5 seconds and the other that couldn't throat the BOD anymore despite past antics. You have to question their motifs.
You both make asimple seem reasonable, fair and tolerable in comparison.
The rat and skunk in full effect.
It's like they fail to observe the obvious
The board never ever purchased prior. They do now under pressure to make the deal seem attractive. But not under their own names, but under others, to rally more troops in their favour. However, as per share splitting, they have only harmed theirshelves. I'm actually glad they done this pre court.
Furthermore, why do we even acknowledge kever or broomtree anymore? Its clear their intentions here, to disuade the BB and create a divide with a side of doubt, yet its so transparent.
Deal*
See kever right there 'when this delay is voted through, we can move on'. The reality is, you are very likely to achieve this and you and broomtree know it. You are both merely here to goad LTHs and provide no other value beside stating such. Knowing this boars is 99% against the deal, why keep throwing out such an opinion as to rile up LTHs? Because you are the bullies and you only reaffirm my opinions of you.
00:59, 12:34 posts seem to infer that our anger is due to a negative position. That is not the case at all, it's due to what we perceived as fair value not being rewarded to LTHs.
Also, I don't like being classified as a bully. But in the same sense, I would absolutely say this to your and kevers face? I am not scared to speak truths and don't think I have overstepped the mark in doing so.
If you had any humility, you would also agree, that what kever contributes is nothing besides rubbing underwater LTHs noses in it and that I don't like. So who is the real bully?
Kever and broomtree, I'm not underwater? I just see a fair value and lack of will from the BOD to ever provide that. Will I leave here okay? Sure. But is it a fair reward for the 5 years wasted and the potential blown, absolutely not.
Furthermore, you kever are the biggest snowflake going. Trying to drum up support in a forum you have continually leered at.
Do not look at the lads here for support. You exude it in every aspect. Also, you know you can simply click reply on the original message. Rather than trying to garner more attention.
Pah! Phone, predictive.
How*
Elegant**
Kever, you do nothing here but leer and goad LTSHs.
You may have picked up some cheap shares at one point in time, but there are many long term holders that you show complete disregard for. You made your view very clear, you want this deal and that's fine. But why do you constantly make juvenile comments day in, day out trying to reiterate your stance by rubbing others noses in the deal that will not suffice? It's clear you take delight in others misery, therefore actually....
Because HL simply do not know. As per Drnse receiving numerous replies with differing answers. I haven't received a HMRC on the forum which they're active on nor an email and nor has HUR themselves.
Do you not think that should HMRC have said its tax free, HUR would have promoted that endlessly?
So why would I listen to a word a leer says? What else do you contribute bar leering at LTSHs? Furthermore, where is your upload to ibb? Knew it would never come.
You know what, Kever, I'll actually apologise for the rat comment. But, even you know now you come off. You are merely here to leer at LTSHs. Because aside from that, what else do you bring to this forum?
Thank you sense, much more elligent and a word smith than myself.
I have contacted HMRC and posted in their forum which HMRC employees/admins respond to questions. Which ultimately is a more credible source. Upload it to ibb.co it takes less than 10 seconds.
Upload it to ibb.co and we can all see it. I said we can see if you are a rat or not. No need to send your private email.