We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
I'm surprised they're not starting to reduce in value then. Granted people have been selling but surely they must start to devalue else it will be worth selling them off after the next payment date.
Shock. Less than the 0.007 min expected and no where near the 0.01. Are dcu's really still trading for 1.77?
I note at companies house director appointments in June 2023.
Both poison to this BB board while the company was listed and you are both still at it now. Get a life, both of you. Surprised there isn't that other guy who I forget the name of here bigging himself up. Mr helicopter pilot.
You have the decimal in the wrong place fan. Otherwise, you would be better swapping off for the 1.77 mbf now.
Divecentre with some stone cold truths. That kever math logic is more hilarious than ASIs bs stories. Besides, claiming he got his payou into sipp already just another bs story on the many other fantasies.
We went through all this for hours and hours one night. He is a straight up liar as Dive confirms. 90% of his posts are merely repeating this about DCUs the other part filled with abuse or fantasies.
Anyway, I have checked in to wish all good luck and all the best. This will now go onto deep freeze for me until we may have to convene again if we do not get DCUs paid out as and when they should. Also recommend you check the hurricane/prax website and read the dcu detailing they have uploaded.
As pig ignorant as asi
That message above is you all over. Thinking you have won when you haven't. Thinking you have provided value while neglecting the fundamentals the discussion was about. Skirting the actual point. You avoided declaring the obvious regarding kever.
This is my last message until tomorrow. You may claim/or believe i'm backed in a corner but I'm simply just out of time. If I had all the time in the world, I would carry on. You still can't even acknowledge the fact that someone is telling people how to vote and supplying false un-quantifiable information.
I'm not abusing you because I'm backed into a corner. I'm calling a spade a spade because for all what may be true with what you said. You can't concede that the poster inquestion is influencing and unable to provide proof on their claims.
Essentially you are calling out the voice of reason. The one that asks for proof and to stop influencing.
So you againare a manipulator supporting such practises but against those that call it out?
By all means, we will carry this on tomorrow.
Ever the manipulator. I stated what I have seen and you in essence tell me I'm lying. On what basis do you know that? I'm not a Mr fantasy helicopter rider, 8 company director and overall bs'er like you that can spend his entire day policing a bulletin board of a stock he has no involvement in. Telling people he should call others out but can't once concede that the poster in question hasn't backed up his claim and is offering financial advice in which direction to vote and to think, i actually thought you provided value.
Your just entirely self righteous and in every way was sense and Co right about you.
I can't be bothered to carry this on with you with such short time.
All the best.
Its merely a request on their already open offer.
I haven't the time to read back through endless posts. It's currently 6am here and I need to work in two hours with zero sleep as it stands, no fault of anyone before you claim im blaming the bb. My commitment here therefore is the most I can give. I tend to scour the most recent posts. Claiming the above is factually incorrect, again you trying to control the narrative in an almost manipulative way.
So me asking a user to upload rather than email as offered (for privacy) is me telling someone what to do?
Because ultimately, I requested humility and to recieve the offer to provide the proof of which others claim. I can only call on what I personally have witnessed/read.
So what are you saying? I shouldn't ask those that offer proof to provide it? Also, I shouldn't merely state vote either way? If so, what has what you have stated above, got any relevance to me?
Sometimes, i think you like to comment and quote to feel big about yourself regardless ofnits relevance.
......
Because I haven't seen those posts? I am not here 24/7 due to other commitments. Had I of seen or witnessed, then i would. But I can only call on what I have seen. Ultimately you infer I am telling people what to do. I'm only calling out those that are factually doing so and that of which I have witnessed doing so. But you are calling me out for doing so? On what basis?
Interesting how you threaten/allay that I have broken rules above yet when it comes to those saying vote yes, you gloss over it. Classic asimple.
Hold on a second. What relevance does that have to me? What others say, is not what I said? Now, you are holding me responsible for what others have said? My point has been stable throughout. I have not persuaded anyone to do anything vote wise but have humility in your decision.
Have you seen me say vote no? So why direct such constant shpil at me?
You have tried to contradict me, as a bully, in numerous ways in the last 20 minutes but none hold substance as irs irrelevant to me?
If you were remotely fair, you would judge on what I said and provide relevant comments.
I have never ever once told people what or how to vote but merely to vote. Yes, I have also asked those throwing claims to merely back their claims of 'proof' regarding the ISA issues which was offered but yet forthcoming. It seems you are purposely skirting that however.