RE: AGM9 Feb 2023 09:42
Doc, sensible. If information is relayed back to shareholders from the CEO and an event relating to said information does not subsequently occur, then shareholders are entitled to know why that is. Similarly, if something additional is planned, like the surprise fundraise that shareholders were told in December wouldn’t be necessary, then an explanation prior to it occurring is apt. In my opinion.
Unfortunately, not all CEOs tie up these loose ends, so then shareholders are left to ponder and perhaps worry, which simply isn’t good enough. With the LP situation, knowing the reason for the additional delay would be helpful, and also what then is being done to rectify the situation. If it is still beyond the company’s control, then an update on progress from the Government should be sought, in view of the three month resolution period now having expired. Otherwise we see sp drift, as the more exacting shareholders lose both confidence and trust.
It’s not too much to ask that a CEO keeps shareholders up to speed and manages expectation well. Or, it certainly shouldn’t be.
Only my view. But nothing ever seems to work out as I would like it to. Lol.