treetop24 Oct 2018 17:06
Good post Treetop. Yes, I guess Breca could also well have been wrong, we weren't to know, and perhaps he was just guessing at being correct. We only knew that he was definitely out to provoke a reaction, and of course it worked, because we had to be vocal in order to defend our investment. He was a human battering ram against the Company, in my view, albeit thinly masked as a fence-sitter. Highly suspect, in my opinion. Tactical journalism. Lol. He was a tricky customer, no doubt, but only a customer nonetheless. Definitely not iron-friendly, and not therefore a welcome resident.
His alleged Swedish holiday home may have part fuelled the turbo-turd behind some of his posts. But, as you say, he was right about the progress. We have to give him that.
We know the law is what matters though, and with such applied, which it must be, those opposed to progress will have to eventually take their slaps, even if they don't like 'em. That will be a fine day.
I agree, Kurt has behaved in an exemplary manner Treetop, but the Swedes haven't. He must consider his approach accordingly now, because of the latter, pointing again to the investment we've made in their country and to the damage incurred on BEM due to their avoidance of responsibility towards this investor.
It doesn't read well presently, but can be rectified. Without trips to court, as long as that option is known.
Over to them.
All in my humble.
Cheers Treetop.