aug5920 Oct 2018 16:30
The law will probably have to come into play then shortly, to prevent further "avoidable" damage:
As for the Mayor, I feel he can say that though Aug, if he believes the Greens have been deliberately obstructive. If they then come back and say they haven't, he can say ok, let Beowulf have the Concession for the Jokkmokk community, because the criteria for such is satisfied. If, on the other hand, the Greens say yes, they have been obstructive, in spite of the laws for the application, the criteria, then they are equally as damned. They can't win here now, in my opinion. Saturation point for the deflection of a decision has long since been reached.
Hence I don't feel it was a bad move from the Mayor, outing those he feels are responsible. It's the pussyfooting about and eggshell treading that has got us nowhere fast to date Aug, so I'm pleased someone has been outspoken in our favour and for the Jokkmokk community. A continual bias for the minority has been all too apparent to this point, so it's refreshing for someone to put things in perspective. In the name of progress to boot.
LKAB, good point re the Wulf dancing to it's tune if we are a minority partner. I'm not sure on that, so maybe the problem won't arise if the State Miner buys us out for a huge premium. Lol.
I don't know what the future plan is, post-concession, and it isn't worth pondering yet for me. I'll just wait and see, as we were supposed to be mining the iron this year.
All warblings in my humble.
Atb.