RE: This share7 Nov 2018 17:57
Bad form to simply state your opinion? (which proved correct) from my perspective the bad form is those that ramped at 5.5p and lost people money. Anyone who followed my trades on UOG would have made money.
This will probably go higher on colter, but i'd prefer 10% for risking my capital for 24 hours, than holding for months for a rainbow which never arrives with all the risk that entails. And what happens if there is a delay, as there was with jog, or worse, a disappointing result as occurred on amer. My 10% now and 20% earlier in the year (4.4 - 5.5) will look pretty good, wont it.
Really is funny people on lse talking about bad form. This place is a snakepit.
"company making asset portfolio"
You do realise that that is just rhetoric spouted by traders who play the swings on these smallcappers? most of these companies (>90%) go from one diluting placing to another shafting lths who are sucked in by the hype of stock promoters.
I can remember swing traders from 2014 who started with next to nothing who are now millionaires, and lth who sat in companies like CHAL, OEX, MXO etc. dreaming of 20 bagging who are now potless. Go look at the share price of each today.
Not giving any opinion at all on the long term prospects of this company, but what I can say is the vast majority of people who "invest" in them rather than play swing trades lose money. If you want to muktibag you're much better investing in a much less exciting but much less risky growth stock, which does not depend on what effectively comes to to a coin toss. You honestly might as well play roulette than hold through a drill campaign with an oil explorer.
I had an argument almost exactly like this with someone on CHAR earlier in the year. Those that played the swing from 8-12p did well, those that listened to promoters screaming buy at the top of the spike are currently holding shares worth less than 3p.
I should probably stop pointing out the obvious on lse, because it only ever results in getting abuse from people in love with the company.