Member Info for eegbvi

1 Who the **** is supapoo for goodness sake 2.If you have no shares at all shouldn't you . be watching footy or something rather than . bothering with here ??

It will take some exceptionally good results from IOF to change market perception of the company and that's very unlikely for another year at least I suspect. Until that happens there won't be any new institutional interest. However meanwhile as soon as the H1 results are available and ONLY IF THEY'RE OK the Company and its advisors can then start putting together some forward planning as part of a roadshow for institutions re 2016. That would help somewhat.

Just curious where your £500k Exchange fee comes from re IOF as the usual is £6,250 one off plus a much smaller annual listing fee. Were you guessing again or perhaps using the BP figures or some such to argue your case. You know Hawky you really should try to stop making these wild claims particularly when you have the foolishness to actually boast about being always right. As it is you're beginning to look a great disappointment to everyone on here. Some people would be far more rude re your guess work and call it something else I suspect. Oh and as to your little puppet he's not even worth talking about.

I suspect it was in fact a rollover but its not shown as that anywhere so just stop making things up as you go along. You don't know its a rollover either do you. ?? Guessing as usual !! The way you come over on here life seems to be just one huge guess for you doesn't it. You clearly have no idea whatsoever re either delisting or suspension but that doesn't stop you trying to look very foolish does it. Stop making yourself look the clueless fool then you might just succeed with the nonsense you keep pumping out. And no I'm not in any way pumping IOF, I don't need to as you and your little shadow do that very well indeed. One day you might take stock and just realize that just making things up on a daily basis doesn't work does it as you're just so transparent. I could for example have said it was a rollover as is likely but its not shown that way anywhere, but you of course as usual have to twist it to suit your own argument simply because without twisting things around the argument is blown apart. Just do try to stop making things up when you really know very little as it doesn't wash.

About 0.3% of the Company's shares traded today and just about 0.1% pulled the SP down. Says it all really. Just no market interest in the company and certainly not enough to get it delisted or suspended. As for people shorting you can forget that also. Think it all at present really just boils down to the fact that there's not much info from the Company so it just gets totally ignored by the market, except for a few small or even very small sellers and they're not matched by buyers simply because there's no interest due purely to complete lack of any regular information flow either from IOF or its brokers etc.

Not really about 100k small sells followed by two buys at 100k each so someone is saying enough is enough or knows the pending figures are better than expected.

Well.we know who the 45k seller was as he/she 'confessed' on ADVFN last Friday. Apparently needed the cash for something else. It was that trade that dished the SP late on. Do give your wild thoughts a rest as its extremely embarrassing for you. First we get delisting without any proof now you're winding up to suspension when there are 24 days left. Its an H1 deal so even auditors are not involved albeit they may well advise IOF. You'd come over a lot better if you didn't look quite so desperate to get your opinion nailed on. Never make a diplomat of you would we.

It really doesn't matter one way or the other if a bank is listed or not as that really doesn't affect its depositors. Quite a number of AA+ banks are not listed anywhere, particularly Swiss ones. The only bank delisting problem is a simple matter of embarrassment for both the Exchange where its listed plus of course Its controlling Central Bank. Provided the deposit customers are fully compensated and didn't suffer as a result any British bank could start the process tomorrow but it would be very messy getting 75% shareholders approval and there would almost certainly be a problem with the Bank of England being satisfied re capital ratios where private capital is substituted for public capital. It could have happened with Barclays which got Qatari capital but that was avoided by the new loan capital structure and the Qataris being assured elsewhere that their loans were secure. In the end due to the loan being convertible the Qataris did well out of it. And Barclays survived.

You should stick with what you believe in. Don't let anyone on here sway you one way or the other. But facts are it takes a 75% vote by shareholders or a Court Order to make it happen. Neither of those seem to be in the pipeline at present. That is fact at present. But of course the market is not good just now due mainly to China and politics which are seriously affecting the oil price and thus the markets. Unfortunately IOF is listed under 'oil & gas' so that doesn't help either. I feel it should be under 'chemicals' for what its worth, but its not my call there. As a small piece of advice, why not wait for few days until the H1 figures are published then make your mind up what to do. Hawky will almost certainly chew over those & its guaranteed that he will 'let fly' on here then. Last words from IOF were that its now EBITDA positive whatever that is supposed to convey. I suspect it means break even but we will soon see.Don't rush this, whatever you decide.

Or it might also be 'strong buy', take your choice.

I know rather more about the GKP situation as my company has the adjoining block but rather differently we're over the border in Turkey so don't get ISIS or KRG/Baghdad problems.

Stop twisting things again for your own argument. The bulk of the delistings were either reverse takeovers or they later relisted anyway after name changes or recapitalization. There were a few that didn't come back but nothing like your numbers. My you really do like to be economical with the truth. At least now you're admitting its a guess on your part whereas last time you tried to make it a certainty. I repeat that IOF will need a 75% shareholder vote or a Court Order and so far there are no signs of either being in the pipeline so do try to drop the innuendo as you simply look foolish. As to the business plan you're correct that seems to have quietly disappeared without any explanation and that is definitely a matter for question. Re the movement of IO1 etc you clearly don't keep up to date with US shale drilling news. If you did you would know that come Oct/Nov an awful lot of the shale oil drillers will be reigned in by the banks and it will leave a vast swathe of polluted well ponds for people such as IOF to start cleaning up. All new licenses make it mandatory for ponds and other pollution to be cleaned at the drillers expense so the driller pays the water discharge. Against that background IOF would be extremely foolish to move IO1 or indeed even produce a new business plan until the dust settles. But that is no excuse for any lack of explanation to shareholders.

Wasn't a bit sarcastic, but sense to someone who spends his/her life worrying. Be that as it may, with your stated choice of shares you clearly like 'going to the races' but like some punters who go there don't like it if you don't win. That I understand very well. You should be like Hawky who goes to the races without any money so he can't possibly lose. Now he has sense there but he would come unstuck by his constant blackballing of the other punters and possibly the bookies as well. And I'm neither pro or against IOF as a matter of fact but certain people on here (they know who they are) usually try to twist words to suit their own agenda. If you're into GKP then very good luck !!

Stick to Premium Bonds, then you can complain to the Treasury if you don't win a weekly prize.

You will be aware that any delisting requires a 75% shareholder vote to do so or a Court Order. May we assume therefore that your delisting statement is backed up by some research or an active canvas of the shareholders. Or are you aware of any pending Court Order to this effect. If you cannot substantiate this then why make such wild statements as by doing so you merely make yourself look extremely foolish.

I recommended to IOF that they buy a copy and they said they would do so.

The UK market etc study re iodine is at. - www.mcgroup.co.uk/researches/iodine Full report costs $1,200 but there's enough info on there without paying. Indicates world market likely to rise about 1.8%pa to 2019 I remember.

Hope Hawky is taking all this information in but somehow I doubt it.

You're getting out of your depth again !!

Very interesting scenario that both Hawkhead and Escapetohome are the only people to post 100% of their views re IOF and no other share on LSE. Almost certainly pure coincidence !!