Member Info for EarEyeAm

The reasons I believe it will take the expedited process:

1) It's been years since it was put in the system

2) The initial decision was biased, even possibly corrupt

3) Tunisia have caused endless delays

4) Zenith Energy has so far borne all costs, they need a final decision ASAP to get clarity on costs to their business

If ICC-2 is annulled, which looks extremely likely now, I believe the new case will be done via the expedited process, with a decision coming within 6 months.

"The procedure is simplified:"

No Terms of Reference required

A case management conference will be convened within 15 days after the date on which the file was transmitted to the arbitral tribunal

The arbitral tribunal may decide on the basis of documents only

The arbitral tribunal may limit the number, length and scope of written submissions and written witness evidence

The final award is rendered within six months from the case management conference.

https://iccwbo.org/dispute-resolution/dispute-resolution-services/arbitration/rules-procedure/expedited-procedure/

More shenanigans from Tunisia. There's no legal basis for the annulment to be decided in Tunisia, it has to be impartial and therefore decided outside of Tunisia. The claim was decided outside of Tunisia, if the Annulment legally had to be decided within Tunisia then so would the claim, therefore if the Annulment has to be decided within Tunisia then the claim decision would have to be annulled for being made outside of jurisdiction in the first place, it bonkers, the Legal people in Tunisia don't know what they are doing, they are total clowns.

Update on ICC-2 Annulment Application

March 11, 2026

ZENITH ENERGY LTD.

("Zenith" or the "Company")

Update on ICC-2 Annulment Application

Zenith Energy Ltd. ("Zenith" or the "Company") (LSE: ZEN; OSE: ZENA; XSAT: ZENA SDR), the international energy production and development company, is pleased to provide an update regarding the application for annulment (the "Annulment Application") of the ICC-2 Arbitration (the "ICC-2 Arbitration") before the Swiss Federal Supreme Court in Lausanne, Switzerland (the “Swiss Court”) submitted by its wholly owned subsidiary, Canadian North Africa Oil and Gas Limited (“CNAOG”).

The Annulment application was submitted by CNAOG in September 2025 and procedurally accepted by the Swiss Court in October 2025.

The Company confirms that the Republic of Tunisia failed to submit its response to the Annulment Application within the required procedural timeframe set out by the Swiss Court and has instead sent a submission to the Swiss Court contesting its jurisdiction. Further, the Republic of Tunisia has advanced a legally unfounded and unreasonable argument that the Annulment Application should be adjudicated by a Court of Appeal seated within the Republic of Tunisia.

The Company will provide an update once further information becomes available, in full compliance with procedural guidelines.

https://newsweb.oslobors.no/message/667952

Both Cahirperson and Ranking Member are taken from the Lands Committee. These are the two people that lead the debate on the REPORT and answer questions on it.

Hon. Collins Dauda is the Chairman

Hon. Kwaku Ampratwum-Sarpong is the Ranking Member

https://www.parliament.gh/committees?com=19

More FACTS for you. It says exactly what I said. Buah is not involved. He can be called my a Motion to appear to answer questions "regarding the implementation of the report's recommendations", a minimum of one day's notice is required for Motions but also take into account the availability of the Minister, also, if the Minister is not available until next week but a deputy is available that can answer the questions then they would do that the following day. So the Chairman of the Committee can lay the REPORT for discussion and answer questions on it in a debate this week.

Q: ghana parliament, who answers questions on a committee report

A: In the Parliament of Ghana, the primary individuals who present and answer questions regarding a committee report are:

The Committee Chairperson: As the head of the committee, they move the motion for the adoption of the report and are responsible for answering initial questions, explaining the committee’s findings, and defending the recommendations.

The Ranking Member: As the leading member from the opposition party, the Ranking Member also plays a key role in responding to questions, particularly to provide a balanced perspective or express dissent on the report's findings.

Relevant Ministers: In instances where a committee report relates directly to a ministry's actions or a bill, the sector minister may be called upon to answer questions regarding the implementation of the report's recommendations.

Once a committee (such as the Public Accounts Committee, Appointments Committee, or Select Committees) completes its investigation or review, the Chairperson and Ranking Member lead the, debate in the plenary session.

Nonsense, I stated the facts, anyone can find the same facts on Google, you don't need AI to find the information, a simple search is all you need. The Minister HAS DONE HIS BIT, it is now up to the CHAIRMAN of the COMMITTEE to present the REPORT. Parliament DOES NOT debate the Agreement it debates THE REPORT, that is FACT, easily fact checked. What anyone THINKS has nothing to do with it, read THE FACTS!!

If anyone wants to question the Minister of Lands, they must request that said Minister present himself to Parliament to answer questions, that DOES NOT stop the Chairman of the Committee from presenting the Report and for Parliament to discuss the Report, with questions directed to THE CHAIRMAN, because it is THE CHAIRMAN that is the one that knows all of the information, advice and decisions within the Report, the Minister for Lands DOES NOT HAVE THE ANSWERS to anything in the Report, only on General Ministry Policies, Laws and Rules.

The Ewoyaa Agreement has already been laid, it was subsequently referred to the committee.

RNS 22 December "The Company is pleased to confirm that a revised Mining Lease HAS BEEN SUBMISSTED to the Parliament of Ghana and referred to the Select Committee, per the necessary process for ratification."

"In the Parliament of Ghana, committee reports are laid before the House by the Chairperson of the specific committee that considered the matter."

The Chairperson of the Lands Committee is Hon. Collins Dauda, he is the one that needs to be available.

https://www.parliament.gh/committees?com=19

"After a committee in Ghana's Parliament reports on an agreement (e.g., petroleum or international deals), the House DEBATES THE REPORT and usually adopts it, followed by ratification through a formal resolution. The agreement may undergo further consideration stages, amendments, or final approval before it becomes a binding legal document."

They don't do all this work twice, the Committee do the detailed bit and Parliament debate the salient points presented in the Report.

A committee report in Ghana’s Parliament documents the findings, deliberations, and recommendations on assigned matters (bills, petitions, or oversight activities). It includes detailed evidence (oral/written), background, and analysis of government assurances or audited accounts to guide the House in decision-making.

Key components of a Ghana Parliament committee report include:

Executive Summary/Introduction: Defines the purpose and scope of the investigation or review.

Evidence and Testimony: Detailed documentation of oral and written submissions from witnesses, officials, or stakeholders.

Findings and Analysis: Results of the investigation, including examination of Auditor-General reports (for Public Accounts Committee) or ministry performance.

Recommendations: Specific, actionable advice to the House on legislation, policy adjustments, or actions to be taken by ministries, departments, and agencies.

Minutes of Proceedings: Documentation of the committee's deliberations.

Committee Composition: List of members involved in the report.

Not from what Google says:

Q: "ghana parliament, what happens after a committee reports on an agreement"

A: "After a committee in Ghana's Parliament reports on an agreement (e.g., petroleum or international deals), the House debates the report and usually adopts it, followed by ratification through a formal resolution. The agreement may undergo further consideration stages, amendments, or final approval before it becomes a binding legal document."

The way I see it is that the Agreement is already laid before Parliament, when it was referred to the Committee to investigate and write the Report on it, the Agreement was not removed from Parliament so doesn't need to be laid again. The Committee are the one's that debated the Agreement, whereas Parliament debate the Report because the Report advises of any points of contention in the Agreement and advises of any suggested ammendments.

Also from that RNS "Following the adjournment of Parliament for the festive period, the Company understands that the Select Committee will undertake its review of the revised Mining Lease in the New Year, before providing its recommendation to Parliament for or against ratification."

That's what Hon. Collins Dauda will be doing any day now.

Buah has nothing to do, nothing is awaiting his return.

The Ewoyaa Agreement has already been laid, it was subsequently referred to the committee.

RNS 22 December "The Company is pleased to confirm that a revised Mining Lease has been submitted to the Parliament of Ghana and referred to the Select Committee, per the necessary process for ratification."

"In the Parliament of Ghana, committee reports are laid before the House by the Chairperson of the specific committee that considered the matter."

The Chairperson of the Lands Committee is Hon. Collins Dauda, he is the one that needs to be available.

https://www.parliament.gh/committees?com=19

RCMFB,

Absolutely!

If anyone knows how to value the Greenfield license and make a good deal on it, that's Valkor. 3x the price should be seen as the absolute minimum to target.

Buys at 17:45 and the last one at 17:55.

Moving up?

It's not a red market today

Gainers 772(54.79%)

Losers 240(17.03%)

Unchanged 397(28.18%)

Yes, it's a Troll. I filtered it ages ago as the trader mind games were so obvious. Just filter it and be done with it.

Minerals, Mining Royalty Regulations, 2025, mature into law

by Nii Ayikwei Okine March 9, 2026

The Minerals and Mining Royalty Regulations, 2025 have matured into law.

The Legislative Instrument (L.I.), which was laid before Parliament on December 19, 2025, introduces a sliding-scale framework that allows royalty rates to be adjusted in response to fluctuations in international commodity prices.

The approach is intended to enable the state to earn more revenue during periods of high global prices.

The regulation also establishes a one per cent Community Development Fund for lithium mining to support infrastructure projects in the Mfantseman Municipality and other mining communities.

https://citinewsroom.com/2026/03/minerals-mining-royalty-regulations-2025-mature-into-law/

Top of their list of activities for the year 2026 should be Ratification of the Ewoyaa Agreement, now that the Sliding Scale Royalty has made way for that to progress.

They are, it was posted yesterday, from yesterday's Order Paper.

"COMMITTEE ON LANDS AND NATURAL RESOURCES

Date: Tuesday, 10th March, 2026.

Time: 10:00 a.m.

Venue: Committee Room 7E (7th Floor, East Wing, Job 600) Agenda: To discuss the Committee’s Programme of Activities for the year 2026."

Yeah, it's not something I'd base my investing on without reading the sources it's using to make is assumptions. Reading the sources is how you find out if it's telling you BS or not.

Some people think AI is an amazing shortcut to investing research, it's not, because often it gets it wrong by using anecdotal evidence, like the opinions posted on here, X, Facebook, etc, rather than fact.

Another big holder increase announced (RNS is on ADVFN but not appeared here yet).

Jonny Mathias

Up from 5.72% to 6.44%

Wouldn't it be great if we were ALL in the know!!

All I see at 8p is three months around that price prior to the rise to 17p, I don't really see that 3 months from march to may 2025 holding any sway over the share price if it takes off, it's not a long enough period at that price and the consolidation at that time was for reasons that don't exist today.

Currently we are on a breakout to 3 July 2025 at the dead cat bounce after the ICC-2 drop at 5p. Get past 5p and it's clean air on the chart all the way back to 17p.