Member Info for drshan

I think they might very well be well in profit - only a few weeks ago I remember seeing 1.4x, 1.5x, 1.6x........all those entry points realised a very nice profit in a short time frame. Dryland is quite right, you don't know, and frankly, who gives a sh it, good luck to him/her!

Thanks for that buddy, actually made me laugh my ass off (dose ne apen often!)

Priceless!

Sorry Adam, similar posts, spooky.

LOL, good one.

Then every now and then a cousin you've never met turns up and says to you "She's coming, she's here, just around the corner. She's got double cones with chocolate sauce and sprinkles". Turns out, he was just teasing you and taking the p iss.

I do actually know why, just thought they were useful additional points. Maybe not.

Great effort anyway, Heroic even.

Two things that should be included.

Cost - Molo head honcho said, "Our test is the best in da world" and more pertinent "It cost a quarter the price" GOV is paying INNOVA!

Why are UK taxpayers buying useless tests at an exorbitant price, from a pop-up shell company.

And - GOV revised required spec for qualifying tests for consideration. The change to anterior nasal requirement set us back months, whilst GOV is busying itself changing INNOVA test use case (from nasopharyngeal) rewriting instructions and approving home use for this substandard test.

Why?

Great stuff Apre, humour - definitely the ultimate weapon!

With due respect, we all know what the answer to that Q would be, so a moot point or a pointless point, after all no-one sane is invested to lose money - no.

Sandler in my view is a clown, brilliant but egotistical buffoon; met lot's at Uni many moons ago. I'll admit I didn't see his poorer personality traits when looking into the company pre investment. That has proven to be a big mistake.

I would rather he step down as CEO, but as others have said, his ego and hubris will sadly not allow it, a view 'rubber stamped' by his recent statements where he essentially says something akin to "what, moi, I haven't done anything, I didn't touch it" as he skulks off into a dark corner of his lab muttering about 'investors' 'people' and his 'important work'.

If I could slap him I surely would whilst saying "wake up buddy, people with real lives supporting you with often hard-earned money have lost a packet because of your and the board miss-management/stupidity".

Just get into the habit of telling her how beautiful she looks, give her a daily squeeze, and you'll be grand. Always worked for me - ahem!

You'll hopefully be fine as long as Vlad gets his head down, starts the trials with no drama, stops the childish, excruciating, unprofessional tweeting.....and err accepts he has no idea about running a business and hands over to someone competent. Thats sounds like a lot, for bad Vlad, CEO of the Island of expertise.

Lucan, you make some great points.

But, I don't give a $h it how much Mint made, nor should anyone still here, it won't help with the pain/frustration.

At Uni, I realised in the first few months that I was surrounded by individuals who were islands of expertise, smart people, but with often painfully narrow focus. It was an eye-opener.

Those financial whizz kids stitched him and board up like kippers, 'n' no mistake. They ran circles around them, and it does beg the questions, 'what were they thinking' and more pertinently 'Who in holy hell was advising them'.

Muppets!

I entirely agree, these scumbags have ruined a potential source of information for many. It is an absolute disgrace that LSE allow their forum to be used in this way.

It's painful to read through their relentless abuse!

Now I'm glad you wrote that Trill b'cos I read it this morn and thought 'What the cluck does that mean!' I didn't try too hard to be fair to myself, but couldn't get John Cravens News Round (remember that) out of my head....like an annoying song. Early onset dementia old bean. LOL

Loathsome, nasty specimens of humanity, greedy selfish chancers and the same goes for the clowns over at ODX - mostly moronic.

Loathsome, nasty specimens of humanity, greedy selfish chancers and the same goes for the clowns over at ODX - mostly moronic.

Yeah, great. Vlad serves us all cold sick....err... I mean news we already were well aware of; even Vlads cat, curling his tail around the leg of the great - shareholder - impaler was well aware of the status quo.

Yes I',m hacked off with him, tweeting bufoon, actually, finance arranging bufoon.

LOL - I could see how that might happen!

Lots of noise today, lots of guff spouted.

"RNS says to be negotiated. If its china giving money, its because they are getting your tech for free. And control. Either way its bad news. Your basically admiting DV can't run a company. They need others to do it for them. Think this through."

If you want to sell significant amounts to the Chinese GOV (the JV Comp is essentially state owned) running into hundreds of millions (perhaps in the fullness of time billions) don't be surprised if that GOV want a piece of the pie. If you need to partner with a huge company with the manufacturing firepower to make significant quantities of product for a nationwide and possibly global water testing program/sales division, don't be surprised if a minnow (DVRG) gratefully makes a mutually beneficial alliance.

It might well prove to be the most lucrative division of DVRG in years to come.

LOL Astrad

A lifestyle skincare brand, selling expensive potions wrapped in a slick website and targeted at a (no doubt) gullible target demographic aching to be rinsed of cash monthly; and for what exactly? The promise of better skin because men's skin is different (thicker, but actually the same - keep that part QT) and look, this stuff is black! Lots of glossy blah, blah, blah.

How is this relevant to STC where you might be advised to look at many and varied offerings from a number of brands in your locale; that have an ingredient profile that will suit your skin (hopefully improve its condition) whilst taking into account the test's appraisal of your skins condition, type, microbiome profile and environmental conditions. They may recommend E45 at a couple of quid from Boots the chemist!

Your post must be advertising for this no-name brand. Hardly comparable with Estee Lauder, Clarins, L'Occitane is it, nor more pertinently with STC that does not actually produce any cosmetic product.

With zero credibility, no assessment of personalised suitability (that I could see, I didn't spend too long looking) or anything with which one could draw a parallel, I can only assume you are marketing - poorly.

Have a marvellous day.

Well they gave in to hubris, greed and were found out - kicked out, now bitter having been jettisoned from their gravy train. Good riddance.

Reminds me of a day at BUPA. Consultant approaches me in the car park, asks how things are, usual banal platitudes, then asks if everything is going well with a look of positive concern as he eyes my mid-range Audi. Things are great I tell him, curious....Oh, I thought you'd have gotten yourself a new car; with all that private work....you must be doing okay; BUPA, it's great eh, the golden nugget, eh!
I rolled my eyes at him as I skulked off in my apparently crap car. Some people, intelligent yes, but greedy and vacuous in equal measure.

Have no idea what some of you have been sniffing this aft, but Bottmzup is absolutely correct, fantasists 'n' dreamers. FFS