Elir over the time I have been invested in Alba, I have read much of what you have written with respect - nothing has changed. I don't like it when people turn up with a story, a story easy to interpret negatively. Let Alba come forward and comment officially, because what is being related does not chime in any way with the companies official narrative of ongoing events. Let's focus on certainty, not unsubstantiated conjecture.
No. With due respect Stu, what Nu is characterising is elements of nepotism and inherent, but hidden corruption. The Americans, with their politics, lobbying culture, financial engineering (shorthand - corruption), Industrial military complex, global warmongering.... and on, and on; truth is, they have a long history of taking others existing established tech, acquiring it (Chinese merely use it royalty free... Ahem!), wrapping their own patent protection around it, and telling, and selling, it back to the world as revolutionary US innovation.
We shouldn't be surprised at being shafted by the yanks, it's what they do; just like our wonderful UK politicians; the modern way - no backhander - no contract. In two hundred years, we've come full circle.
So Stu, it might very well not matter, vis-à-vis our 'new science' because unlike our own government who like nothing more than supporting overseas providers of pretty much anything, they (the USA), habitually give most of their infrastructure contracts to US companies..... but let's hope we can be the exception.
RE: Why are people blaming suzy when the only comments on rns was from kevin cox!06 Sep 2021 15:35
A1 - Ever seen the scene in the film Irréversible where a chap get snuffed out, utterly destroyed by an angry ex-boyfriend with a fire extinguisher. It's a difficult watch, but as you spam the board with your childlike BS, I can't help but visit the finality of that act and consider it as fitting for you.
The regulars are quite correct. You are like the ignored child, aching, craving attention - rather pathetic, tragic even. Still Teamhanz loves ya.... so that's something I suppose.....
Last 18 months I'm sure I distinctly remember reading AIM was number one market. Why, massive profits on offer for the nimble, insightful trader/investor, whilst global markets were in chaos. This period has been my best ever - apart from the money I parked here, that has gone up a bit, but by comparison, I'll concede, would have done massively, monstrously better elsewhere; but I didn't know that then, and I do aim for a balanced portfolio. Swing and roundabouts.
Enough for one day - Give Muggy a cuddle - never mind.
And here's Paulcon (surely Paul4truth would have been better) with the usual pivot (conveniently) to a more conciliatory tone. Next we will have the MSYS merger guff trotted out - again - there's a cheeky prediction!
San Diego - Been doing this a long time, it's been talked about, again ad nauseam, but it's a familiar defensive position to adopt, I get it - ask for proof. Truth is, there is no definitive proof, you know it, I know it, but I know what I've witnessed thousands of times over the years. Tag teams of scumbags -everywhere on every forum.
Yes I know he raises some valid points, which I, unlike he/she have acknowledged. Shame he cannot reciprocate! I, and others have made demonstrably factual points highlighting progress, revenue generation, his response - silence - doesn't fit the narrative though, does it.
You are absolutely wrong fella. Thousands around the world read these BB's every minute of every day and they most certainly have a very real influence; any popular 'flavour of the month' share will demonstrate that; doesn't fit the narrative though, does it....
15:20 Muggy whinges: And again have points made for all to see re: progress and no response, no concession.
The hot air, the vacuous prattle with an agenda, all from you Muggy. Pathetic de-ramping!
Repeated, by you ad nauseam - and you have the brass neck to tell others that they posts are pointless! You're here again with your truculent refrain - yet again - decrying everything in your oh so selective way.
Isn't STC, labskin, revenue, new labs, collaboration etc. progress muggy. How about a genuinely balanced, considered view, from you, for once... Mmm
Sold up buddy... need a re-trace to jump back in eh! ENTIRELY FOS.
"As management and team are also shareholders we feel the frustration also. The outcome of the deal is so large, the material impact is such that AIM Rule 11 applied where should information known to the Company, be released, but not to all shareholders, could have an effect on the share price, we were obliged to issue the announcement. Sometimes, it is not always our choice. Nothing we say can please everyone, either with enough information or with what has to be withheld. Have a great bank holiday weekend all."
Was a bit fed up with that, 'at it again' was my first thought. Within 2 hrs share price is up 27.xx to 31??
Clearly more and more people can now see what we all saw many months ago with initiatives like STC, and the very real possibility of dramatic, substantial income pouring in. Gets the attention of the momentum chasers; snag is, they are a fickle, spineless bunch who will jump out just as fast. Hopefully we will attract some more serious investors who have a vision of 2-3 years, by which time the price could well be many multiples. I will still be here regardless.
Think If you read Mr Rhubarb's excellent posts of the last few days you will find he mentions the clause (5) of recent AGM which gave the BOD permission to issue warrants (not sure didn't read it, you can dig it out and read it).
We obviously need to see the scope of work that is expected for 3.9M. If it transpires that it is just for standard broking service, line up some II investors at market prices (seems unlikely) or something more creative, it still doesn't add up; why would you gift them all of that stock for a few reports and some intro's.
Her initial response to Iceman definitely surprised me in its startling inadequacy, but perhaps she finds herself between a rock and hard place insofar as any adequate, illuminating answer would obviously lift the metaphorical curtain, and she clearly can't do that. Just a thought, as things as they stand, just don't make sense to me at all, and I refuse to believe they sat around and came up with (as Nick S and Adam P inferred was) a kick in the teeth. All of this talk of HNWI, we some by anyone's standards right now.
Well with the best will in the world, eventually those valuable CEO minutes have to be apportioned wisely, and given that she no doubt skims through this BB and sees the duplicitous way you conduct yourself, the fact she has chosen to blank you, is no surprise to anyone fella - only you.
Note for future: AIM share - look at historic chart as part of due diligence. Observe peaks and troughs. Correlate against historic news.
Buy the bits of graphs that look like low points; do not buy the higher bits (without certainty - even then it's often a bad idea).
Good god man, you're buying because the St Tropez circus is in town?
Go and find the old adage/Idiom can't remember the distinction at the mo, about being sat at a poker table. If you are not sure who the patsy is, the sucker..... well, it's almost certainly you. They out played you matey - you are the sucker at the table.