RE: CUDA and field costs13 Jan 2022 20:52
Some similarities could perhaps be drawn with 88.
An interesting figure from the Peregrine Development was of 1.6B bbls
which was the overall Mean prospective oil resource, with its assessments of :
Low (1U) 131Mb,
Best (2U) 744 Mb,
High (3U) 3,739 Mb.
The mean of prospective resources 1.6B bbls then being an approximate correlation with our OIP of c.1.6B (of which c.0.3B are believed to be outside our boundary).
It’s not the accuracy of the figures we are interested in, but is how the market reacted :
97% of 88’s stock then being owned by Pi’s of which it was estimated 12,500 had got involved at its peak (then works out an avg. of 1M shares per Pi).
With c.12B shares then having settled for months at 0.4p, they then proceeded to 10 bag, over a period of 20 days, with the motivating factor being the Merlin drill.
With 1.6B bbls of prospective oil on its books, the sp sat at 0.4p with an mc of c.£50M
When the drill was spudded, it then doubled over 2 days (0.8p)
prior to retreating 25% (0.6p)
Two to three days later then saw it again double (1.2p)
Prior to a brief respite, then taking off linearly for the last week prior to getting drill result (4p).
The rest is history. But worth trying to understand how the market will react in a build up scenario.
Question then is, will we stagnate, as 88 did at the £50M mc?
I’m guessing that in part it will be down to some comms from AM (lord help us!) but that primarily, with production already being progressed, that the market’s bigger players will take a far more active interest. As perhaps we are already beginning to see.