Member Info for dougb189

To paraphrase, I suspect several of my fellow shareholders of being on a similar psychotic frequency as Vladimir Putin. I'd agree that the levels of communication are shockingly bad, but is that I differ on interpretating why that is so, from your clearly stated views on incumbents deceitfulness, to my interpretation which sees that he is at least communicating with some shareholders, imo, he is still trying. Pi's are currently caught between a rock & a hard place; do the forthcoming trials & events constitute substantial efforts to align project with new direction taken, or are they as you describe, devoid & unsubstantiated updates... I'm guessing that apart from yourself, most Pi's will be wary of glibly calling an EGM and will settle back & see if the forthcoming advertised efforts, are in any way, substantiated.

My opinion fwiw bud, is that Bligh represents the outstanding 200M warrants. Downsides ? & quite simply I'm generally far more sceptical of my fellow Pi, than I am of any budding entrepreneurs. You quote 'to canvass' yet peeps are asking 'who is canvassing' which you then fail to address. If YOU canvass for an EGM, that puts you in the spotlight, one has to take into consideration All the players involved. You can not argue that an EGM can be considered without taking any due diligence on those players. So, whilst I therefore have respect for Mr.Moss & his technical abilities, but that from the little pieces of information that I have managed to glean, is that I'm less than enamoured with how he portrays himself, ie, his lack of management/personnel skills. Even the wee bits of patronising details that still arise eg. email.me.999@dotcom, or the previous handle, email.me@newcloudtag, I find are enough to simply switch me off.

May I ask bud, are you perhaps on a vegan diet......?

Really at a lost as to why you persist in clouding the issue : You pointed out that '..I was fence sitting..' on the very subject of EGMs and Alon Moss. I had previously, 9th Feb, posted a response to a earlier enquirer from the Twitter Group, where I then had highlighted '...that the Twitter Group wish for the ex-employee Alon Moss to be installed as an NED, and that comes with some positives.....' And to which you replied I was "sitting on the fence", yet you now persist in stating that you've never been aware of the gentleman before this thread. If you are blatantly clouding this rather banal & simple point, then what other more valid issues are being clouded over.... And at which point, you Are clearly seen desperately trying to smother debate, based around your adamant ruling that debating the requirements of calling an EGM is a simple yay or nay ? '..Where is the harm..'' you cry, but will then not allow any further discussion on the validity or credibility of those earnestly pushing for said EGM.

Lol. Methinks he doth protest too much, & whilst talking of a total lack of sincerity, just a wee recap : the original post from K27M, Friday a.m., 11:46 '''....The general feeling was appointing a NED to represent shareholders, something that I was open to doing and appointing a NED to carry out a DD review. Something that AM was open to doing and also has significant past experience in undertaking....." No doubt there will be another explosion of colourful diatribes, yet more of "...playground politics, puff&blusters, 'oh so certains', 'gossips with their own sense of importance'... all of which will constitute '..iirrelevances, misdirections, smoke&mirrors or fear mongering..' Misdirection ; yet suggests that a post calling for an EGM is a simple question, only to be answered yay or nay ? Irrelevance ; yet gleefully fills the bb with colourful diatribes Smoke&Mirrors ; & yet he changes his story, from denying having previously heard of Alon Moss's involvements, to one where it is now limited to "In This Thread" Fear mongering ; & yet himself suggests.. covert groups, bad spy B movie, misdirecting 'tizzy' lol it does rather come across as the sad old teacher who chastises his english-language pupils for inappropriate usages, then blithely commits them himself ?

"...where's the harm in calling an EGM that solely looks to obtain clarity and nothing more?.." '...And. Nothing. More.....' And straight off bud, i'm guessing, that most peeps will be questioning your rational. You purport to removing any debate on the pretext its 'clouding the simple question' and yet your interpretation of said 'simple question' then lays itself open to further questioning : You sincerely believe, that on obtaining clarity, that any of those currently debating, and currently inclined, in seeking an EGM, will after obtaining your 'clarity', then seek to do... 'nothing more' ? which rather conflicts with how the Twitter Group spokesman sees progress being made from an EGM: "......This NED is there to ensure that shareholders best interests are being focussed on and if this is inconvenient for ABH, tough...." So, 'shareholders best interests' are what exactly ? Apologies, on clouding that simple......

HITS, '.......All that's on the table - leaving aside wild speculation - is a possible EGM. Anything else is white noise... at best irrelevant and at worst misdirecting......' For the curious, mildly amused and those just quietly reading, please try explain, what could hope to be achieved by an EGM that could Not be thought of as anything, other than white noise...

a repeat of a previous play, 'exit stage left' ?! way tooooo many sensitive souls around, btw, where is Abman these days.. Anyone confirm for whom the Bligh tolls ?

Tracy, any possibility of getting Keiran on next coffee meet......... Their prospects of resolutions are zilch, but with that wee bit zest recently seen in Amit's step, could he possibly not try entertain a representative from the Shareholder Action Group ? Just saying...

Enjoy the weekend, gal, you've done the shareholders (all!) really well. And you know there is of course NO thanks! Been recommended the 'flat white' but is wee bit stronger than my normal, & is as you well know, i enjoy lots of frothing .lol

Could be argued that all 4 players, individuallly, show a wee bit weakness, But together as a team, and look what they have accomplished...... (bearing in mind the primary function of assembling a coffee-meet team, was at the peak of rampant tweets on new CEO's...). Enjoy the weekend bud, whoop whoop, & that's me dragging my old bones to the ski slopes.

HITS., I'd very much concede that Tim does indeed deserve a medal, his responsibilities have been enormous, and he has tried to do the best with what he had available to him. Wether or not he dislikes, distrusts or simply loathes Amit, he has tried to facilitate all. I would then disagree, on your earlier thoughts re booting Mr.Bligh onto the touch line : it can be possibly read that all 4 players at the meet, have similar considerations, number 1 being that 2017 was a crap year for CTAG. Each will have their own & others vested interests at heart. It actually appears to me that, Jamie Bligh & Tim, have the closest similarities, their dislike of Amit & their interests in getting the best deal for their respective clients. Certainly worth watching & my thinking is there will be something more substantial than Mr.Bligh getting into a tizz over a meagre sub 5%. Again, it suggests to me, warrants are being looked after...

'....perhaps outreaches to ALL shareholders ... unless of course there are only.... within our Group of 951 Cloudtag Investors...? (TA)......' Who is suggesting that All shareholders is limited to 951 investors?? Anyone, who could read, would see that there was never an intention for a one on one, personal meet with Amit, for personal gratification, but that the requirement was to get reps from all sides of the table, is. Both pro & anti groups, & for All investors to get represented. Yet now, it's only limited to 951 souls? So. Lol..... Care to expand on who else is invested in Cloudtag....? You may possibly have noticed that the bb of late, has been somewhat critical of Mr.Bligh's rather aggressive stance against the shareholder group's representative, responsible to 51% of all holdings, when his own alleged holdings, are in dispute, as there is simply No recordings of any holdings.... Now, anyone seeking to assist the group as a whole, may then reasonably have sought to alleviate those genuine shareholders with their worrying concerns.... With your silence on the issue, other than to strangely exclaim about 'limited considerations to other shareholders', Are you then possibly suggesting that it is okay for a non-significant holder, to dictate terms & gagging orders, to both Amit & the shareholder group, with no proof of burden to those concerned Genuine shareholders...... Decaf??

*Corvus....and I'm guessing, think warrants *

I queried earlier how long it would take you to find the Achilles Heel in the opening line of the Introduction... Is indeed a very interesting opener with again it's inclination towards gravitas on Initial 'founding father' status & little else to show for it. Young Hex has graciously filled in the technical data on background positions, which then just leaves the interpretation of the man's personal touch, or his complete lack of : '....Making this seemingly egotistical and double-dealing mouthpiece "investor relations officer" seems about as appropriate as deciding to appoint Dr Harold Shipman to the chair of Help The Aged...' There are though, as per the game of AIM, many sides to this coin... The very apt analogy with the doctor of death, is also, sadly, similar to how Amit sees the representative of the shareholder group : When Amit first replied, it was to a query as to why the shareholders had failed in arranging an informal December coffee meet, and for which we had proposed : Tim, as shareholder group rep, the pro-Amit side; Ian Everett, as twitter group rep, the anti-Amit side; & Tracy as intermediary. Amit had simply replied that he had never received any request from the shareholders group rep. Significant, primarily as it showed the respect, in the position of the representative of shareholder group, & secondly, that perhaps Tim was not into 'informal coffee meets to gauge confidence levels', nor perhaps was he pro-Amit. When trying to set up an informal December meet, then the 1st requirement was to get someone, with whom it was thought Amit would be comfortable with, which then put the spotlight on Mr. Selfridge, but he had declined as (a) similar to Amit, he was also sickened by the more violent & aggressive shareholders & the abuses that he & family had sustained, & that (b) he had lost all confidence in Tim, who's inability to keep his word on earlier confidential disclosures (see NeilStAlbans earlier write up) had meant he could not be trusted & at which point it was disclosed that neither did Amit trust Tim. It slowly dawned that the earlier December attempts for coffee meet with (1) shareholder rep (2) twitter group rep &(3) a trusted intermediary, was compromised by Tim's close association with the twitter group, namely that everything confidential was immediately being reported back to within this group. The twitter group had evolved into a militant crowd who were very much biased anti-Amit. Ian, a very respectable voice, had now gone. Amit in one breath had given kudos to the position of the representative of the shareholder group, but in the next breath, he was quite fearful of that position holder's history of disclosures. 'the doctor of death' analogy currently works for both sides of the table... Hopefully Amit will see further than just entertaining Corvus & the ladies, & again strive to be inclusive of ALL shareholders. Corvus

no bud, i'm strongly suspecting next meet will be very similar in relaxed surroundings for all 4 concerned, ie same players as yesterday, in similar environment, with again loud slurping noises of 'cappuccinis' (are you sure HITS?!). so long as Amit is talking, then confidence is good. we can pre-load our two share holder representatives with the awkward questions..

Dougal, there should be a copy in your inbox bud. Neil., there is a wee bit of Pi militancy floating around, but hopefully with the latest confidences being shown, then there will be no repeat.....

I had half-thought that Young Hex would have attacked from the Andrew Regan angle, highlighting that man's commitment, or perhaps lack of.. Outwith Bligh's shallow arrogance, it Is intriguing though why they still have such an interest ? 51+% owned by Pi's, another c.10% owned by Amit & close associates and c.40% unaccounted for... would certainly be worth the effort in refraining the more militant Pi's from their delusional aspirations. But just not by way of alienating ALL the Pi's. It appears though that a happy medium has now been reached...... (*ouch* from my rapped knuckles) Tim perhaps having difficulty in spelling '...cappuccinos'...... or was it lattes.

All credit to Jack Mackenzie as per his twitter feed. '.. structure and grammar...' is how it is, in the age of text! Good effort & lets hope that some copies can be mailed through the letter boxes of some relevant department heads

Uni students I guess, & courtesy of those Uni's charging extortionate expenses, kinda then suggests some talented overseas students, may have wrote the report... Good for us as is very similar in style to Amit's, with his wee bit limitations on the vernaculars. On a Big plus point, very much looks like Amit's game-on for another wee round of shareholder chats, with a coffee meet, sometime in April, provisionally booked in... Leaves time for a wee bit skiing.