Member Info for dougb189

"...Damn but it's hard to make sense of your posts these days, WM and DougB.." As apposed to say, the nonsense posted Friday 13:03 of 'cast-iron H1 deadlines' "...I dunno why it's apparently so difficult to state clearly and simply what one means? " & yet any old nonsense is all we get in return, '..zealots...fatwas...', take your pick.. "...Just out of curiosity, you two, is there actually a point by which either of you will lose patience with CTAG? If there is, would either of you care to share it?..." So, having neatly back-tracked on earlier posted nonsense, or of any semblence of explanation, for said vivid extreme rants, will now jump out of context, and ask those who are asking difficult questions, the daftest question of all '..would you care to share it..." ? & would have thought, if bb history is anything to go by, it was quite apparent '..the point at which you lose patience...' is fairly easy to spot, it's when all the nonsense arrives ? '...would you care to share it...' and one thing that my bb history shows, that yes, when the time has come to depart, I have indeed always deemed to share it, irrespective of picking up any abuse, or of having to listen to the churlish nonsense of those who differ from my views, with eg. their jaundiced '..zealots..screaming blue murder..' The reason for even bothering to reply to such inflammatory nonsense, is that there are diligent investors looking for answers to the poor performance that is CTAG, and who deserve a lot better than the current nonsense that is '..cast-iron assurances..' Patience ? & each to their own.

'English my bad' ; your excessives have nothing to do with your viewpoints on CTAG, But rather, of the parallels between those colourful character excesses recently seen in '...zealots... fatwahs...hijacked...screaming blue murder ....promises of cast-iron H1 deadlines...' And the character excesses that so allegedly outraged Young Hex, so much so, he falsely deemed it as being one of his reasons for posting on a bb that he has no alleged financial attachement to (& of course simply nothing at all to do with his petulant ego) and to a certain extent, indeed courtesy of bb history, your own numerous posts of Greaseball et al, those who were '..guilty swine excessively ramping the stock..'. A simlarity then, with those previous excessive ramping positives (swine) as with current excessive negativities (legit, or so it seems) with yours being amusing excessive character negativities, & Young Hex's being amusing daily excessive stock negativities. Hence.... pot / kettle / black. Outwith the rampant hypocrisy, and the weakness in the argument just shines through.. '....promises of cast-iron H1 deadlines...' Young Hex does it daily, he needs that fix, it picks him up from what ever dark place he resides at, & most readers of the bb can recognise that, as will most sincere investors who will recognise that Wakey had never given any cast-iron H1 deadlines, but rather she was 'prepared to wait till the end of H1' as I too also concurred with, based around the then available knowledge. To suggest 'cast-iron' and with a history of such glib remarks..?

With Young Hex's daily ego ramps, his 'out of context' misdemeanours, his predilection for jumping in way out of his depth, chasing mental exaggerations for all negativities, taken as 100% guaranteed, when catching up on this bb, it does now appear to come across as part of a 'double act' : "...I've kinda lost track since the last attempt was apparently hijacked by one or two screaming blue murder and smokescreening desperately with promises of cast-iron H1 deadlines, at which point their own views would radically change..." Laurel & Hardy, springs to mind : Slapstick comedy being their forte, but for our duo, is not so much excessively exaggerated physical endeavours, as more excessively exaggerated mental endeavours. Care to explain your "..promises of cast-iron H1 deadlines.." lol, i'll surmise from past endeavours '.....irony & nowt at all to do with iron...' ?? It does seem a wee bit crass ('tongue-in-cheek' you will no doubt reply), when all can so easily recollect, those daily chastisements, of all & sundry, on this bb (particularly 'Greaseball' on a more frequent than daily basis) who were '..guilty swine ramping the stock..' & yet again, very glibly, & we now have : '...zealots... fatwahs...hijacked...screaming blue murder ....promises of cast-iron H1 deadlines...' So quite hilariously, we now have those from, lets say.. the dark side, venting their egos daily at 'excessive positive ramps' and yet who then both think absolutely nothing of excessive negativities.... pot / kettle / black....

Wakey., Lol, that will be a biscuit in each hand. Unbelievable the extent to which it rants anything negative. Hopefully though, it will keep the tirade going thru the next 5 weeks, Gives earnest peeps a chance to see, what the possibilities are..

* kit-kat *

What is it with you and your infantile approach to anything involving numbers : "...When kcal burned in exercise is say 300kcal of a 2k+ kcal total then yes HR accuracy during the 300kcal is clearly inferior to overall accuracy during the 2k. What is 10% accuracy worth of 300kcal, 30kcal. 10% extra accuracy in a full day would be worth 200kcal..." You are barking on about an alleged 10% discrepancy, which with your melodramatic play on figures, then shows there is an error, a Whopping great error... of 200Kcal ?? Do you have any idea, what that means in the Real world.....? It is the energy equivalent of a fecking chocolate biscuit. We are chasing Obese patients, eating several packets of said buiscuits, NOT Anorexic patients struggling with keeping down that guilty kit- At least try get with the programme. '..which market is that...' & as Wakey earlier posted, with you, then a little knowledge becomes a dangerous thing.

"In terms of cryptocurrencies, generally, I can say with almost certainty that they will come to a bad ending," Warren Buffett" Said the man who lost $2B+ on IBM.....

'..@dougb189 that is not my position and you surely must see it...' no, I truly do Not see it.. Your consistently negative outlook means you approach any replies, blinkered, And then when your negativities are answered you then proceed to jump in & out of context : '..How could the onitor have great 24hr energy expeddature readings when it has far fewer sensors,..' So Again, your false assumption, that 24hr accuracy is paramount... '..it is is just a step monitor, it is up against, HR, stepmonitor, gps...' Yet Again, the accuracy of GPS is a false flag, when asking an obese patient, to start walking once a day, to eg. the local shop, you do Not need to know to the exact millimetre how far he or she has walked, but you Do need to know, what that HR is doing. '...Do you have any evidence that the onitor is more accurate over 24hrs, because I can't see any reason why it should be...' Now we have TWO Fasle assumptions, (1) that 24hr accuracy is paramount. & (2) that I have ever suggested this. '.. rememebr it is up against companies which have been in the market for many iterations, with huge data...' It is NO longer in the same market as off-the-shelf fitness trackers, it is Aiming at a specific niche market. Consistently False suppositions, which can then be best surmised as, a rather juvenile ego run amok.

Appears to be a fairly standard response to when the ego struggles to keep up with its own oblique references to anything it finds suitably negative, which when replied to then gets the now standard : "...stop misquoting me....stop taking it out of context.." Fri 13:01. "..I was using the same premise that Cloudtag does itself. It claims that HR accuracy during exercise makes it a better weightloss device. I showed that under that premise, the HR accuracy is inferior to 24hr HR monitoring.." So, already a confliction of 'premise' 1) original, shows accuracy 'during exercise', whilst the other then jumps to 2) that the accuracy 'during 24 hr monitoring' is naff... So, stating that the function of accurate HR measurements whilst exercising is secondary to the monitoring of 24 hr activities in general...? Now, a simple question... you get given a contract from the Health Boards, to assist in the well being of obese patients, so which criteria would you suppose would be more critical (a) the 24 hr accuracy of day to day activities or (b) the HR accuracy whilst under exercise.....? Which again, is then explained. & of course, then immediately followed by jumping out of context : H. '..that is one hell of a shift in marketing stratedgy...' Moi. '..no, that was posted & discussed 12 months ago..' H. '..your reply is irrelevant, but I'm glad that you agree with me, that would be a good shift in focus. But Cloudtag have never stated they are now just targeting chronically I'll patients and the Onitor will be chest only. That be the problem..' Posting your negative interpretations, that your ego thrives on, is perhaps Your problem ? Remind us all again why you are here : '..'it's to edukate those poor unfortunates on why they are not squandering resources and having independent auditors go over the accounts, to the benefit of both long and shorts..' '...stop misquoting me... stop taking it out of context..' cried the bruised ego, for the umpteenth time. Lol, so was a quiet weekend then peeps.

Disturbing child, who's brash statements were easily refuted, & who then proceeds to swing the topic out of context, When any replies highlight those false statements. Now demands 'provide list of pros & cons', to fuel yet further similar statements. Child with overgrown ego, having '..led the way in CTAGs new direction..' Easily ignored.

'patience' and is i've always enjoyed the long plays. On each of them, there always appears an alleged 'expert witness' for the prosecution, And at which point i'm then again reminded of that quote : '..give a child a hammer, & everything looks like a nail..' Quiet weekend, catching up and quite pleased with what i'm reading...tq

In 12 months time, i have not the slightest doubt you will be patting your ego on the back, having then realised it will take substantially more than just a sensor, to entertain the Health Boards & Insurance companies.

i'd suggest that it is You that has lost context : You stated that 'Onitor's accuracy over 24 hr period is naff' I stated that 'Onitor is more concerned with accuracy WHILST the patient is exercising' MY argument from 12 months ago, '..you could not have obese patients red-lining their heart rates, whilst taking their 1st walk in two weeks down to the paper-shop, as we would then be liable for insurance claims..' with today's, "..totally fails to comprehend that accurate readings during exercise for Chronically ill patients will be paramount..." And at which point, you Again jump out of context : (i) the original argument being your '24hr naff accuracy' is easily refuted, i.e. not needed which then swings to (ii) 'a big shift in marketing', which again, is shown 12 months out of date. A recurrent theme with you though, is jumping out of context.

'..your reply is irrelevant..' spoken like true student liberati.. when refuting the falsehoods in their argument. lol. you are one sad child bud. =========== '..not when considering that it is the exact same reply i gave 12 months ago..' Now, when i stated that, c.12 months ago, that Kinda suggested i had at least an inkling that CTAG's marketing strategy was Not on the same par as your easily seen negatives.. Yet, you now lay further false claim : "...I'm glad you agree with me that that would be a good shift in focus..." AND still you fail to comprehend, that your vision of 'a shift in focus' was seen by others, eons ago... But hey.. well done, Take a standing ovation bud, and perhaps a wee clap on the back to keep that ego happy.

"...you reply is irrelevant.... I'm glad you agree with me that that would be a good shift in focus....But the cloudtag and Amit et al have never stated they are now just targeting Chronically ill patients and the onitor will be chest only. That be the problem...." So, a defining summary at last : 'your reply is irrelevant..' when pointing out the false in your 'marketing strategy' ? 'i'm glad you agree with me..' whilst taking claim for CTAG's new direction, from last year ? 'That be the problem..' lol, do you have Any inkling at all, of how foolish you are sounding ? In summary & You are Only on here, to propagate that Ego.

'..... "..that is one hell of a shift in marketing strategy..." not when considering that it is the exact same reply used,....' ======== So, forgetful of previous argument's responses, albeit from 12 months ago, and quite a distinct paradigm shift in your replies, just how many AI students are we talking about....

39MA., it displays the same single perspective / youthful argument, over and over. some AI students struggling with reality, comes to mind.

"..that is one hell of a shift in marketing strategy..." not when considering that it is the exact same reply used, to when you last used your '..Onitor inaccurate over 24hrs..' argument, which was when... 12 months ago... A wee bit of your 'youthful' petulance again ?

Lol, could have been a lot worse bud, the character equation could of been : ..anti-social ego, cantankerous, blinkered AND oblivious to ideas or reasoning..', but you only score on the 1st three points, whereas Young Hex makes it a full house. ======= Talking of which, is anyone else starting to suspect a BOT at play : devoid in thinking of any real-life solutions to multiple scenarios, instead opinions & answers in almost a single solution simplicity...e.g. '..an Onitor 100% accurate in exercise but loses accuracy over 24hr period..' & totally fails to comprehend that accurate readings during exercise for Chronically ill patients will be paramount ? I again, keep coming back to those 'Young' & often petulant replies, and all i see, are some students at play.... But hey... lol

Lol, goodnight bud & enjoy that full moon.