RE: Chinese contingent..25 Jan 2021 22:19
‘.. It would be best if the company announced the 100% .
I am thinking of any pitfalls to announcing 100% ownership.
Anything less will be seen as a bit of a let down...’
There was a quite a bit of excitement on the Atomic notice and it was not just from the upgrade which would come with being a producer. There then existed the possibility that AM was aiming at broader horizons; perhaps to try & emulate the successes of the current North Sea’s most celebrated investor, namely Andrew Austin. AA with a background in management consultancy followed by developing IGAS, then followed by setting up RRE, & its 6 acquisitions resulting in it morph from a £4.5M cash shell, to then being sold 4 years later for £250M, was a good act to follow, & there was then some similarities being seen across the pond, with AM’s recent handiwork. Could there be in the future a similar MO? And at which point the 100% WI becomes less significant.
Let’s face it, IF it does all get successfully wrapped up in one loan, would AM get recognition for it or would the market assume he perhaps got lucky, as apposed to say, 1st acquiring Atomic, letting the dust settle, secondly obtaining NOP’s % share of field, then finally obtaining the Chinese %, in effect building up market sentiment (over 3 separate acquisitions) & which we could all agree currently appears to be somewhat lacking.
As pitfalls go, it is rather negligible. Wether there’s only a 57% share, or a 84% share, or the full 100%WI, there will still be significant gains for all to enjoy. There is though some Interest on if this was a one off fluke, or if perhaps there is also a similar US market of stressed & cheap stocks, awaiting a competent management development team to bring in development..
Was therefore a wee chuckle at those promoting $100+ for a barrel of oil, which (a) seems rather fanciful & (b) is not one wishes for when hoping to make a killing from a distressed market.