Member Info for dougb189

HITS, i believe a Minor correction is needed ?

You omitted '...& foolish..'

just immeadiately after "..everyone knows..i am as cynical....."

========

& Do tell me bud,
that you Have been able to work out with at least, a fair probability,
who is the desperate author, of the sad yet humorous thread...

"....re BLVN but same sort of principle..." & remarkably, some might say, a similar sort of 'investor' : Given that an ex 'investor' on here, who posted that this was nothing other than 'Fraud with a value of 0.00p' who then dumped his 'investments' at 1p during 2018's Health Expo week. So.... WHO exactly is leading BLVN's revolt......

"....that equations of calorie expenditure are irrelevant because near enough is good enough...." Which I did kinda hope, would be exactly what is picked up, by my example given ?! My bad! It has got me thinking though, that the temp sensor as described with monitoring 'in association' with Just the step counter, may actually then be best placed, for those rate of change calculations....

Misbehaving of course, playing at being the tourist, whilst floating past the Summer Isles.... Still chuckling at '..analyse..'

As a semi-interested, part observer, part experimenter, nutritionalist, I'd hazard a guess.. Way tooooo many berries, of the squashed & fermented kind. A few Chill pills needed. Night-night & do let's try behave.

As a very recently exposed nutrionally expert, then without doubt you know for fact, The truth is in the pudding, so... Can these 'vests' whilst communicating, also deliver SOS & order up more tea bags...?

I know it's late dougal, but good lord, I thought that you would have twigged on by now : '...Furthermore; the Company is recruiting a 3rd Board Advisor with an academic background in nutritional behaviour, who will supporting Cloudtag....' I mean, how easier could it be : . "....ditch the mars bars.... & opt for nuts...." Lol (Wakey, ps. The nuts plays havoc with that 6-pack of hernias)

click on menu, top left, dougal, then gives : inventor Mr. Alon Moss applicant Cloudtag

jimmyb., that kinda ties in with how i'd imagined it to be, but it still falls a wee bit short ; routine schedules, of walking, running, etc., would then come with fairly routine calculations weight x age x speed,... which when inputted into the calcs, then gives a fairly close approximation to the actually cals burnt off, (as per my 16:07 post (lol, apologies my cross-referencing K2, but is a fairly standard equation commonly used)). But, i had wondered on the variable aspects, as 39MA was hinting at, of specifically a rate of change, in the metabolic dis't'ings, as being trumpeted... The criteria for me, is simply that, obesity patients will require VERY close monitoring whilst exercising, so any sudden rise in body temperature, would imo, need to be monitored closely, as will the RPM's of said patients. This puts me into thinking that there could be an associated increase OR decrease, in the rate of change, of body temperature as the patient's health improves, or as that obese patient loses weight, which again might be tied into the metabolic adaption equations... Is appreciated bud, it shows how an earlier patent, imo ,may utilise said temp sensor. Big thanks. Wakey., wizened old, playr smart coach, is indeed what i need.

i'd thought that that i am still c.150 years short of that magic figure of yours '..three..ohh..ohh.." ? & coincidently!! Secretary has earlier admonished me, for not acting my age : ' yer losing tooo much weight' says she, 'training regime' says i, 'several peeps heading out to the greater ranges, and the test piece prior to going, is a wee walk around the hills "Tranter's Round". which requires an ability for a 24 hours steady plod.......' in the ensuing silence i ventured 'The graphs show, per kg body mass at c.4km/hr (inc.lots ups&downs) then works out at a calorie expenditure over each 30 mins, almost very similar to one's body weight (e.g.. 100kg = c.200cals per hr burned off). I'm now at 15 hours ability, and hope to save the cost of 3 Mars bars....' 'yer not a spring chicken anymore..' says she. Ok, perhaps only 100 more years to go.

What was the name of the old fella, him whose primary trait, was an inability to listen, or was it just he had no hearing ?? 'Geoffrey' ?!

"....Oh God... I'm getting my tin hat on..." Lol, a nice vision of Capt. Mainwaring, suddenly jumped out. (Thinking of acting opportunities & would volunteer....What was that spiv's name again?)

John Harrison's interminable wait of several years for that King's prize of c.�20,000, for his contribution to sciences, which Rodney then collected....at a substantial interest, Is rather apt ?! Lol, Plenty of time yet, so a wee recap on the definition of fallacy : a mistaken belief, especially one based on unsound arguments. logic a failure in reasoning which renders an argument invalid. faulty reasoning. "the potential for fallacy which lies behind the notion of self-esteem" ============== So, unsound arguments, sourced from faulty reasoning, (a) who's reasoning was self-confessed as being nothing other than "hyperbolic" (b) who's self esteem, allegedly stemming from his PhD in computer science, has us.... laughing out loud, with his quotes on 'real world experiences'.. Summary. One sad young pup.

39MA, appreciated, thank you. was indeed a wee bit enlightening, but i do believe you finally got there : "....I consider my job here done because you are finally asking the right questions and not ignoring metabolic adaptation....." in a similar vein, my tasking was a lot easier... i just had to highlight the futility in arguing with a child. And i'm guessing most peeps will be able to surmise, 1) that his rampant petulant ego combined with its foolish inconsistencies, is just not worth reading, & 2) what's with all the..... temps sensors ?! .

So, eventually you concede, that your fallacy which stated that I decreed that the onitor has a temp sensor, was nothing more than the shambolic ramblings of a tormented mind .. Absolutely, well done, wee man, there's hope for you yet ?! Oops, wait a minute : Which then just leaves my hypothesis open, for that anxiety to then ferment over : "...surmising then , that the temp sensor in the recent patent application, is tied into the metabolic adaption calculations..." lol. lol

'...So as it turns out that the onitor doesn't have a temp sensor..' Your childish petulance is starting to shine through again wee man, your false arguments, insinuating I have decreed that the onitor has a temp sensor, is clearly seen, as nothing more than just another of your fallacies.. There's a world of difference between stating what the onitor has, and surmising that a patent inclusive of a temp sensor, could be tied in to metabolic adaption calculations... Anymore petulant assumptions that you would like to entertain the bb with ? (you really should try and sleep, wee man. The bb will still be here when you wake up)

"....@dougb189 a couple problems with that. a) Cloudtag have never claimed to have a body temperature sensor on the onitor..." Problem appears to be all yours wee man, any darn fool knows that Cloudtag has indeed never claimed that.... "...b) other wearables have a body temp sensor so how is it unique?......" & so again, we all see you haemorrhaging your fallacys, insinuating your false arguments : Did I claim it was unique... ??? So, how many hours sleep did your ego lose, trying unsuccessfully to calm its anxiety ?! lol.

surmising then , that the temp sensor in the recent patent application, is tied into the metabolic adaption calculations...

'... or even someone operating at a level one step lower down...' and thinking out aloud...contemplating those illuminated lights.. would the Insurance houses & would the Health Boards, necessitate having to have their own individual operating systems.. or does one size fit all (courtesy of 2017's Eastern sea-board trials)

'...if i had stated he believed x then spent time arguing against x, that would indeed be straw man..' How else would you explain your 100+ posts of the last month... .?! Lol, indeed. K2, There are again just some 'speculations' floating around, which I'm happy to monitor.