Member Info for DonaldTrumpsWig

It was Bill Tap Bella and what he said was that if AVA6k was proven to be more efficacious than standard dox then overnight it would become the standard of care for STS.

What is incredible about this mornings RNS and a point alluded to by PL, is that AVA6k is improving outcomes for cancer patients where dox is not the standard of care. I think big pharma will need a new, extra large calculator, with added digits to work out the total addressable market for the Pre/Cision platform

If the SP doesn't bounce on this RNS then it's official, the market is definitely as thick as mince

Several patients remain on trial in different dose cohorts and continue to receive AVA6000 as their disease has not progressed

Absolutely fantastic, well done everyone at Avacta 👍👍👍👍👍

Yesterday Avacta (AVCT) and its Nomad Stifel deliberately misled investors about a placing it had had to abort after I revealed all on Saturday

HERE. I have written to the Oxymorons at AIM

Regulation pointing out that this is an active deceit and suggesting that both Stifel and Avacta should be sanctioned and forced to 'fess up. I do so just to put this latest failing at the casino on the record, not in great hope that the Oxymorons will actually do anything. The letter is below

Any subscribers have a copy of the letter.

I’d be interested to understand how TW was able to ‘reveal all on Saturday’ I must of missed that RNS 😩

WYN said.. 'Perhaps its not about the science'

Anyone who invests a single penny in AVCT without an understanding of the science is an absolute plank, period. If they base their investing strategy on previous LFT 'delays' or house purchases or bull*** rumours of pending raises etc etc they deserve to lose every penny.

Anyway WYN, the good news is this will be my last post responding to your daily nonsense. I have allowed myself to become embroiled in calling out your garbage and it's clogging up the board and distracting from the useful stuff.

Good point Neut, manufacturers of anti side-effect drugs will be watching the AVA trial with great interest.

Agree with that 13th Monkey. AIM is incapable of recognising the significance of the opportunity at AVCT.

Sadly, the science is beyond the comprehension of the typical AIM investor, who typically, have neither the money, the time, nor the intellect to grasp the scope of the opportunity.

Yesterday's appointment of Mr Chilton was incredibly significant in my opinion and suggests that the BOD recognise that the market is incapable of valuing the company appropriately and therefore the best solution is to appoint a proven dealmaker to lead the company into a process of corporate activity.

IMO, Mr Chilton hasn't been brought in to bolster the SP, he's here to leverage his contacts and lead negotiations on significant license deals, and/or a part or total buyout.

WYN - you as k for a 'civil discussion' yet you post unadulterated rubbish such as:

'

'We know the money won't last forever, so we know the most likely outcome is a further cash raise' - you have zero evidence that is the case. You say 'we know' as if it is a fact, but it isn't a fact, its an opinion plucked from your sphincter, nothing more.

You and Sage need to stop telling other posters how we should behave and what we should and shouldn't be saying and stick to facts, except neither of you have any and sadly, the only thing most of us are interested in is the science and we know that's not your strong point, is it?

I know I'm wasting my breath and it's my own fault but please don't bother with a long boring defensive essay once again discussing what people can and can't say, with lot's of question marks etc etc etc etc

' and it made me think ' - I thought I could smell burning !!

Sorry to jump in Yeboa but WYN just said the following which is absolute made up/guesswork rubbish

'I hope that when AS said that the bank balance was £27m at the end of May it included the £7.4m spent on Corris.

I am thinking now, it probably didn't, so £20m in the bank would start to make sense of AVCT maybe quietly doing the rounds for money now but they got sprung'

What are 'Partents' ? For camping? I'd like one of those if only I had the money !! You have been warned

WYN said ..'Of course there is a cash raise coming '..Genghis said ..'and the fact that a raise was in the works'

Total nonsense, with zero evidence, what actually happened was that a spurious rumour was started almost certainly with the intention of creating FUD with the hope of dropping the SP through the psychologically significant £1 barrier. It failed.

Recognising this as nonsense, the company moved swiftly to dispel the rumour. Trying to spin this as something significant is total garbage. Companies talk about funding every day, all companies do it, it's called running a business, absolutely nothing to see here.

WYN - your repeated attempt to spin this morning's RNS into 'just because they've said no raise is imminent doesn't mean they won't need to raise very soon and by the way, imminent only lasts for this week'... suggests to me that you are desperate about something.

Please tell me that you've haven't followed TW and taken out a short? Or perhaps sold out on Friday at a £1 hoping to get back in today at 90p LOL

Good debate RAH and can't disagree with anything you have said.

In my opinion, I think the BOD are becoming aware of what they are sitting on and its value and simply want to double down on the data before they start shouting from the rooftops. It's potentially massive and they want to complete all trials in full so they can publish a full data set. We think a few months is a long time, they have been working on this for over a decade.

As you suggest, if they were more commercially minded, I'm sure they could 'sell the sizzle' more effectively but I just don't think this is their style and listening to interviews with AS, Neil Bell, Fiona Mc et al would confirm that to me.

The link Timster posted earlier is well worth another listen as AS clearly states near term objectives and critically, timelines, which he clearly explains require some inherent fluidity which are NOT delays.

I've stated before that the fundamental problem with the SP here is not the opportunity it is the market itself. AIM has neither the liquidity nor the investor profile to grasp the disconnect between the current price and future enterprise value. Serious investors don't shop on AIM, they shop on FTSE & NASDAQ and this is where we need to be if only to get close to the broker valuation.

Sadly, I can't see the SP ever reaching a sensible valuation whilst listed on AIM regardless of the content of the next RNS's.

There are only two plays here IMO and that is either, one or more significant licence deals or a full/part buy out, neither of which will place any relevance on todays SP.

It's coming and soon

Sorry if I sound pompous D-G but I'm sure you've heard the proverb:

'if you find yourself in a hole, the first thing to do is stop digging'

You said - 'Luck played a part' I'm hoping that you said that tongue in cheek because even a Rhesus monkey would understand that luck has played no part in the years of science and exhaustive research that has delivered the Pre/Cision platform

My point Touk is that to get where AVCT have arrived at today requires both great scientists and great management, you can't have one without the other as you claim.

Derek said - 'I believe in the science - yes - But what has happened to make you think the business is being well managed?'

Jeeez I feel like a fly on the wall in a lunatic asylum this morning. Did you read the Science Day presentation? listen to the subsequent interviews?

You claim that you 'believe in the science' yet are unable to join the dots to deduce that it is only because the company is incredibly well managed that we are on the cusp of a genuinely seismic shift in cancer treatment that could be worth billions.

Do you think the company arrived at where they are today because they got lucky? despite being badly managed?

WYN said - 'AVCT have a track record of when things don't go to plan by going silent'

Give me one example, no. not even one, give me a scintilla of evidence that things aren't going to plan. Also, define what you mean by 'going silent'? We've had 4 RNS's in June so far and it's only the 15th

Honestly Wyn, you and your alter-ego D-G are the thickest people I've ever come across and what's really depressing is your blissful ignorance as to your lack of cognitive ability.

DG said - 'Tim, what was moronic?'

If you can't see the stupidity in comparing a respected scientist/CEO on the cusp of delivering chemo without side effects with a bumbling, stuttering, lying, chancer of a failed politician then you are beyond help.

More moronic news vacuum filling garbage from the sealion

WYN said - 'What? you mean like we are producing a new omicron LFT? how long did that silence last? Or the sales of BAMS and ELISA?'

Comparing the ongoing AVA trail against the success of Covid driven DX initiatives inc BAMS, Elisa & the LFT is like comparing the success of the Apple iPod/iPhone to the success of the Apple Newton or the Mackintosh TV.

It's irrelevant and has zero bearing on the AVA6000 trial and the Pre/cision platform. Only a complete moron would persist with comparing the two.