RE: Polygon3 Nov 2022 18:21
Circumstances might change where 35p ends up looking like a great result. But not yet or even in February. Any bidder, be it Polygon or big pharma, would need to persuade 90% of shareholders to agree to it to force everyone else to give up their shares. Now for me I won't be considering any bids sub £1. Probably £2. And I have significantly increased my holding where that would realise a very nice profit. 35p... I'd rather see the shares go to 0p than let someone have mine for that. But as said above, if we're further down the line and there's been bad news, I might be glad of 35p.
Anyway, put another way we'd need 10% of shareholders to decline any daft bids. Bear in mind the BOD and employees of Synairgen hold a decent chunk of shares. Here's some from the share register:
Simon Shaw - 0.76%
Richard Marsden - 0.49%
Stephen Holgate - 0.44%
Ratko Djukanovic - 0.42%
John Ward - 0.36%
Phillip Monk - 0.21%
Then they'll be others staff who hold through brokers. I also know of another decently sized holder or two who won't be selling out cheap... ;)
The point is, any bidder will need the BOD and Synairgen staffers on board...and me ;) Is SSH and RM (on his inflated salary that MrCosts loves to mention) really going to give up a lifetime of work for 35p? I doubt it.
A final word on Polygon. Even for their size, dropping what would be £100m+ on a tiny micro stock would be quite the punt. They'd have to have some serious conviction and after February I'm sure even they will be wary of how sour things can go. So far they have spent a tiny amount post Feb relative to their overall cost. To spend another say £50m to buy it out entirely, that I just don't see. And if things are looking a bit rosier (i.e. trials are set up) then they'll need to spend much more. I just don't see it.