Member Info for Discodave4561

Sparky Pal

You do know the price fell today don’t you, ergo more sells than buys.

£20 eh, let’s see, not long ago you posted this would be £200.

Sparky Pal

I read perfectly well thanks.

Can see Bobbys sell trades on Friday but the company bought them off him but those trades were not listed.

So you posted Schroders Investment Management hold 2.5% so they have sold half then.

Still waiting for your correction and acceptance that an RNS trumps a crap website.

Sparky Pal

To clarify the Schroders Investment Management Ltd holdings, you have stated they hold 2.5%, so they have sold over half their position then. Because their holding was 5.01%.

So JPM bought 32,680 shares on the 13th and YU CEO sold 309,168 shares. No wonder the share price dropped!. Well done Bobby, perfect timing, not. But hey he wanted to offload before the closed period started on the 15th.

Well spotted Sparky Pal. You must be checking every hour!.

Still a decent short IMO.

Any update on the false info you’ve posted on Schroders?.

Sparky Pal

You have posted that Schroders Investment Management Ltd hold 2.5%, yes or no. So the RNS 6161C is not correct is that what you are saying?. You are unbelievable.

You’ve also posted that two funds operated by Schroders hold 2.72% each, yes or no. Now the chances of two separate funds or trusts holding exactly the same level of weighting in the same company to two decimal places is about as much chance as you winning the Euro lottery.

Sparky pal

YU is an aim lusted company that should also update its financial calendar for regulatory disclosure purposes but they don’t.

Also from Mr google - Under the AIM Rules for Companies, specifically regarding regulatory compliance and market transparency, maintaining an accurate financial calendar is essential.

You need to accept that a RNS trumps a crap website.

Nice google answer there Sparky, but your point is what exactly - that YU website sourced via a third party is correct and legal FCA filings that are seen by the market is wrong.

You are posting misleading info, end of.

Ps the simply Wall Street was a joke because you also quote such crap websites when referring to major holdings.

Sparky Pal

The info on the YU website is not what has been filed in accordance with FCA regs.

Now where do you suppose YU get theor info from?, do you think they can be arsed to check on a daily basis any holdings RNS’s, I very much doubt that, they can’t even be bothered to update their financial calendar or keep comms flowing.

They will grab the data from third party sources IMO, do you know which is their source and how they themselves collate that data and double check it’s in accordance with legal requirements?, IMO they don’t. Why, because the TR1 says otherwise and I will always go on that rather than a source like Simply Wall Street (jeez).

Sparky Pal

It may well be on the company’s website, not saying that is false info, what I am saying is that you have mentioned their alleged 8.3% at least a dozen times and fail to accept that their legal filing clearly states they only hold 5.01%. I’ve posted up the DTR regs and posted up the TR1 RNS 6161C yet you will not take that on board, why, because you only have rose tinted glasses and will cite any info even if it’s incorrect because it suits your agenda.

I’ve posted constantly that I will always challenge crap posted by you. Literally nobody can post their views on here and elsewhere if they are in anyway negative without you and your sidekick attacking on a personal level. Well if you can’t take it don’t dish it out. Because I’m going absolutely nowhere despite your antics on here and elsewhere :)

Sparky

Don’t give a rats ass whether you believe me or not but when you post up false info I will challenge it.

You can’t disprove that Schroders only hold 5.01%, yet keep posting they hold 8.3%, which is misleading info and IMO completely false. Yet as ever, when you are challenged you resort to personal accusations which are again just false.

Sorry typo Schroders 5.01% not 5.1%.

Lovely shade of green :)

Good morning Sparky

I’m not under water as like you I’ve no position at the moment.

Previous posting I missed off 5.1%, should have read:

Any holding in excess of 3% has to be reported to the FCA via a RNS TR1.

Websites are not regulatory / legal filings, they use non confirmed data sources. If folks believe they are factual that’s up to them. Sparky posted that Schroders Investment Management Ltd hold 2.5%, that’s is completely incorrect. Schroders RNS 6161C clearly states what Schroders Investment Management Ltd hold 5.1% as well as the ZERO holdings for other Schroders subsidiaries and Schroders PLC.

FCA reg DTR 5.1:

Under DTR 5.1.2R, a person must notify the issuer of the percentage of its voting rights they hold as a shareholder or are deemed to hold through their direct or indirect holding of financial instruments falling within DTR 5.3.1R (1) or a combination of such holdings, if the percentage of those voting rights:

1 reaches, exceeds or falls below 3%, 4%, 5%, 6%, 7%, 8%, 9%, 10% and each 1% threshold thereafter up to 100% (or in the case of a non-UK issuer on the basis of thresholds at 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, 30%, 50% and 75%) as a result of an acquisition or disposal of shares or financial instruments falling within DTR 5.3.1 R; or

2 reaches, exceeds or falls below an applicable threshold in (1) as a result of events changing the breakdown of voting rights and on the basis of information disclosed by the issuer in accordance with DTR 5.6.1 R and DTR 5.6.1A R.

According to Sparky Schroders holds 8.3%, so where’s their legal notification?, why does their last holdings TR1 state they hold 5.1%?, there is also a requirement to notify within a prescribed period, I believe it’s 3 days (folks correct me if I’m wrong).

Any holding in excess of 3% has to be reported to the FCA via a RNS TR1.

Websites are not regulatory / legal filings, they use non confirmed data sources. If folks believe they are factual that’s up to them. Sparky posted that Schroders Investment Management Ltd hold 2.5%, that’s is completely incorrect. Schroders RNS 6161C clearly states what Schroders Investment Management Ltd hold as well as the ZERO holdings for other Schroders subsidiaries and Schroders PLC.

I’m simply posting what has been regulatory reported to the FCA, not what is stated elsewhere, which IMO means diddly squatt.

By all means contact YU, ask is the data in compliance with legal requirements and where did the data come from. IMO the posted declaration that Schroders hold 8.3% completely contradicts any regulatory filings. IMO these websites have overlapped / double counted individual fund holdings rather than what has been legally filed with the FCA.

Lovely green box again.

Anyway, Sparky has constantly posted up that Schroders hold 8.3%.

But below is the TR1 RNS 6161C where it clearly states that Schroders Investment Management Ltd hold 5.01% not 2.5% as posted by Sparky. There is no regulatiry filing that supports this claim that Schroders holds more than 5.01% and not the claimed 8.3%. Third party websites have overlapped induvidual funds IMO. You can also see on the TR1 that they list the zero holdings in YU for two other subsidiaries as well as Schroders PLC.

So to conclude, based in FCA filings Schroders only hold 5.01% of YU not the 8.3% Sparky constantly posts up, thats misleading info IMO.

https://www.investegate.co.uk/announcement/rns/yu-group--yu./tr-1-notification-of-major-holdings/9158899

Do love a green box!!!!

Someone’s definitely heading for a breakdown.

Ofgem is imposing stricter rules on suppliers regarding smart meter installations and compensation for delays, effective from February 2026. With all those unfilled meter engineer posts then delays are inevitable IMO.Theyve tried to entice folks into applying for the jobs by offering start up bonuses but no luck it seems.

Sparky Pal

Elsewhere you posted that sellers had let JPM off the hook…..it was your beloved CEO who sold!. Couldn’t make it up.

What other directors will be selling options after the finals, in closed period now.

One final point, he knows that selling down his majority holding will require a discounted secondary placing and he obviously wouldn’t want that when he can pocket millions of pounds just selling his options. He’s happy to see if PE put in a bid and make him a quarter billionaire or whatever.