Member Info for Discodave4561

As mentioned previously a nice short term bowl is forming, will it close above SMA200 resistance?. It is heading towards being overbought though.

Fully grown thanks monkey.

So all those engineer vacancies that have been open for a while now suggests what?, to most that says they can’t employ enough engineers to fulfill their metering installation forecasts, or are you saying they want 31 engineers just to sit around doing nothing?.

As posted previously they now have regulatory targets to hit installation deadlines, if not they get fined.

Have a good day, do you like battered bananas?

Looks like they are struggling to fill vacancies for meter engineers, over 30 posts not filled. Can’t be helping their growth plans.

They also have litigation manager and paralegal posts to fill. Not a good sign that they feel they need to strengthen roles to cover litigation matters - that said it makes sense.

‘Tick up coming and the board clown thinks the 5k was a sell OMG”

Must have missed the tick up, did not say the 5k trade was a sell, said it was more likely a buy. You do post up a lot of lies and false info.

Just like you said a TR1 was incoming, you must be the only person on this planet that knows what the future holds. I heard via the grapevine that they wouldn’t let you in the Whitehouse for the peace talks because of your big red nose and funny shoes, you clown.

18th August

Sparky:

“You could not shift that much YU stock for effectively no change in the SP when NMS is 200 shares. So anyone claiming all sells is a Liar.”

Now you are saying you never said NMS 200, then your favourite word, liar. Couldn’t make it up.

Suppose the filter is back on again until September!

Sparky Pal

I’m fully aware of the ebb and flow in the share price here. You jump up and down after two / three days of upticks spouting a TR1 is incoming, well no sign yet.

This is going no where until the Sept update, it’s next resistance is c 1623, it’s formed a nice short term bowl since 16th July and may gain some momentum, then it could be odds on to do its norm and drop on results. Look at the last 52 weeks, it’s not exactly flying is it,

I am not a trader, how many more times do I have to say that, yes I trade but also a long term investor. Unlike yourself that doesn’t hold any stocks or trade just gobs off at anyone that prices that what you post is generally all complete ramping rubbish.

Sparky Pal

You are so full of it, I posted up what the NMS is all about and that it helps liquidity plus it changes and is based on the preceding years average volumes, now you have repeated what I said, prior to that you have posted that trades above the NMS will move the share price.

You don’t even know what liquidity is with regards to YU’ s cash and their covenant.

I accepted that the 22:35 trade looks like it’s closer to the ask than the bid, i also accept that the bid / ask is never what’s shown, or invariably it isn’t and have listed that too.

You really need to wind your neck in and cut out all the very childish insults.

Sparky

I truly don’t think you can actually read what I post.

I said it looks like that 5k trade was closer to the ask than the bud, thus a buy.

You are the idiot, you don’t know what the function of the NMS is, you keep spouting that trades above 200 should move the price, complete and utter nonsense. The mm’s want trades to be above the NMS to help liquidity, but you don’t know what liquidity means, according to you YU’s cash has nothing to do with their liquidity covenant - clueless.

Sparky Pal

You have not been doing dummy trades all day.

I may be a lot of things but an idiot is not one of them.

Aaargh just seen the unknown trade pop up, apologies (through very gritted teeth).

Yes it was at 1590, the supposed mid price, which could be a sell or a buy. A dummy trade still doesn’t prove what that trade was, yes it may give an indication but it’s not proof like you keep posting. My guess is it was closer to the ask than the bid but who knows other than those directly involved in the transaction.

Bet you are going to say you’ve done a e done a dummy trade it was a buy, well you are doing a dummy trade over an hour after that trade went through.

Sparky Pal

‘Last one and right on queue a 5k buy @1235 but that’s a mid price isn’t it DD”

WTF are you smoking chap ffs, what 5k buy?, are you for real?, the bid ask has been 1580 and 1600 all day and the trade at 12:35 was placed at 1581.50, and you reckon that at mid price and a buy, jeez, I rest my case.

I suppose you are going to say you’ve done a dummy trade and the actual ask is at 1580 and the bid is 1560, yeah right whatever.

Sparky Pal

As posted unless you have actually bought a share a dummy trade doesn’t tell you what the ask price is, it gives you an idea nothing more, but depends what platform / broker you are using. The only person that knows whether a buy or sell is those directly party to the transaction.

You posting that trades are buys when they clearly are closer to the bid price at the time of the trade just shows how blinkered you are. Ffs you don’t even comprehend what the function of the NMS is all about, yet you keep banging on about it as though trades above that level have to move the price, which is complete nonsense. It’s all about demand, more buys up goes the price and vice versa,.

Sparky Pal

My maths is fine thanks.

It was a consensus of 1% last time I looked but yes you are correct it’s now appears to be +11%. Blame my data source. I don’t lie chap, If I’ve been incorrect I edit and update.

Are you saying that the y will hit their original Rev forecast for this year?, when it’s there in black and white that forecasts have been reduced. From memory they stated it would be £730m to £760m, so mid £745m, so £710m is a miss is it not.

Oh dear back to TEP again, it’s not comparable, completely different business model. At the end of the day primarily YU simply by energy and sell it to SME’s, nothing else. British Gas is eating Bobbys lunch, their EBITDA growth for business energy supply grew 15 fold, YU just 11%.

Never said it was false info, can you not read, I said go to various data sources and they will have a different listing of the major shareholders.

Still waiting for you to post up the Schroders TR1,

Who do you work for other than YU PR?, you don’t hold shares in YU although you like to pretend you do, you don’t seem to hold any stocks come to that, you just post day in day out on YU ramping the foook out of it.

Rev forecast growth only !%. Time will tell if margins have mitigated the drop in revenue in order to maintain their eps forecast for this year. Let’s see how good the new CFO is at making those “underlying adjustments” to earn his money!.

At one point you accused me of working for JPM, then you accused me of being Paul Scott, I’ve lost count of the false accusations you have made on a personal level, try just sticking to the subject matter and facts eh!.

Ps can you let everyone know when the mystical filter has been activated again, and again, and again, and again, and again, etc etc.

You can go on various data sites and you will get completely different accounts of their major shareholders, post up the TR1 to show Schroders hold what’s on the YU website.

Still waiting for the TR1 you stated was coming this week.

Sparky

You are the liar chap, you post I’m filtered then make the excuse you’ve unfiltered me to see what I’ve posted. Everyone knows you have t filtered me.

You posted you were going to sleep until September too!.

You posted on ADVFN:

“Filter boy spread disinformation on LSE, anyone see where Rawson was sacked ? Thought not”

Not filtered, not a boy, you must be confusing me with your other self the little pip boy.

Anyway, if you think Rawson wasn’t given the push then that’s up to you, IMO he was given the push - he stated in FY19 the business would make a profit, they made a £5m loss, now this years revenue forecast has had to be reduced (they failed to communicate that gem to the market in the latest update, tut tut). So no golden goodbye, no mention he was part of their succession planning (post up Sparky where they communicated that . Then they take away some of his options too.

He and his partner sold 68% of his / her holdings last year, doubt Bobby looked too favourably on that decision as it shouted to the market the top was in / the share value had peaked at £17.

Grow up, not everyone thinks the same, it’s called a market.

yep the sacked cfo moving shares into tax wrappers so can sell some.

bobby took away some of his options, as a thank you no doubt for messing up their revenue forecast for this year (not to mention the **** up he made in fy19)

Yes a decent purchase by the looks of it.

Takeover!, really, wow best jump in and buy some quickly, before the infamous £100 a share, jeez.

Looks to be range bound and bouncing around them£15 mark no doubt waiting for some news in Septembers update. If BK doesn’t do something with their cash that is available for distribution then this will just drift downwards IMO.

Needs some positive news for any likelihood of upward momentum. Forecast Rev growth of only 1% just isn’t going to do it.

Looks also that some peace deal may finally come to fruition, it will still take months but one things inevitable, peace will come at some point in time.

Sparky Pal

‘Never mind the £100 plus cash year end.”

£100 pmsl, if that’s all they’ve got then this will end up as part of Shell UK.

£100m me thinks you meant, and so what, how much is non distributable due to their liquidity covenant - oh I keep forgetting you don’t know what a liquidity covenant actually means.