Member Info for Discodave4561

Sparky Pal

I’d like to think you aren’t confused now.

But before you go please could you provide that confirmation statement months ago to support the fact you knew they were selling (even though you are now not too certain!).

Never said I’d email the FCA, said I’d email Mt Turner, he can then inform the FCA if he do wished. I mean it has to be a fair market doesn’t it, if you knew they were selling before they informed the market then you could have let us know too!, wink wink :)

Ps filter back on now I assume - lol

Blade

But I’m filtered so no need for Sparky to respond to my posts.

After all I posted what Bayford has informed the market today, then Sparky said he knew that months ago, I challenged that, then he changed his mind and said he doesn’t know whether they’ve bought more or reduced (he was confused), so I’ve simply tried to assist with his confusion.

I see you’ve contributed to the debate as well, oh hang on, you’ve contributed nothing, other than trying to tell him not to enter into any debates with me.

But do you actually have any thoughts on the Bayford holding ?, or prefer to try and stop me posting instead, which you won’t.

Check the postings today, I posted then Sparky attacked like he always does, I’m not one to run away :)

Sparky Pal

So you refer to simplywallstreet (algo crap) and the YU website (oh dear) as proof of what Bayford held,?, really! OMG.

So when you said there was a statement months ago that Bayford were selling that was utter garbage, yes, it was an assumption by you based on hearsay / crap data sources……..c’mon Sparky it was you trying to say you know everything, just like your comment that nobody on this planet knows more about Ukraine, Russia and the Middle East than you.

You need to feed your bloated ego don’t you, and when challenged you throw your teddy bear out of your pram.

Sparky Pal

You should know better, the TR1’s are legally required and the proof of holdings in listed companies, not what you think in your warped mind or what’s contained on other websites.

The TR1 issued 11th November stated Bayford held 3.15%, they have now informed the market their position has gone below 3% to 2.68%. It’s not rocket science is it.

So please post up proof as you’ve stated that you knew they were selling months ago , not a difficult request IMO.

So Sparky

You saying you knew that Bayford were selling down below 3% before todays RNS, post up the proof, no good waffling on and on about your sources, post up where they were down to 2.68% (2.64% excluding their CEO).

It’s a simple request.

Sparky

As for your constant reference to Ukraine, and your belief that the war will continue forever and ever, have you seen the UK gas price?, you know your fallback for a ramp when it’s going up!.

‘UK natural gas futures fell to 76.7 p/therm, near the lowest since May, as optimism grew around Ukraine peace efforts. After talks between Trump, Zelenskiy, and European leaders, Trump urged Putin to plan a summit with Zelenskiy, fueling speculation that a ceasefire could restore Russian gas flows to global markets”

Sparky

Filter switched off again! PMSL

C’mon fella I’ve drafted my email so post up the statement you referred to that said Bayford were sellers months ago. Me thinks I’ll have to assume you were full of bull and there was no statement, ergo you knew from an inside source and JT still deserves to know there’s a leak.

Sparky

As asked, post up the statement you said where Bayford / JT confirmed they were selling months ago before they notified the market.

If no statement then you had insider info, youve said that, so do think I should let Mr Turner know that there is a leak within his company, he can then inform the FCA accordingly.

Oh dear Sparky, whenever I challenge the utter garbage you post up you do wjat you’ve always done, resort to childish personal name calling. you really are something else.

Poor Sparky is confused PMSL

You posted earlier:

‘bayford have been selling down toward 3% for months and for the ******s when you go below 3% an rns has to be issued.”

‘Well stalker if you actually paid attention to shareholding websites and the YU site you would have seen the reductions along with Miton”

‘as you say fella bayford sold and this has been stated and known about for weeks and weeks and weeks just formally confirmed now,”

PMSL, Sparky is absolutely clueless and doesn’t really know wtf he’s saying.

On ADVFN:

Bayford & Co Ltd1.96%Shares 328,676Value UK£5.3mChange % 0%Portfolio % 0%Last Reported 01 Jul 25

So have bayford acquired ? Or have they reduced as get confusing

Jonathan Turner3.11%Shares 522,043Value UK£8.4mChange % 0%Portfolio % 0%Last Reported 17 May 24As

Jonathan Turner is associated with Bayford.So the more I think about it the more confusing.

So buying or selling ? Who the hell knows but SP has been rising since the 22nd Aug.

Jeez Sparky, ffs, they’ve reduced their position from 3.15% to 2.68% (2.64% excluding JT’s).

So on here you were saying they’ve reduced and that you knew they had been selling for months, now you are saying you don’t know if they’ve been buying.

100% clueless and credibility ZERO, a clown of the first order.

Sparky Pal

Make your chuffing mind up. Only just read this from your post (I tend not to read too much of your crap);

“But suits your agenda doesn’t it, you maybe right but also maybe very very wrong”

So now you are saying I might be right about Rawson being sacked, jeez. Are you incapable of actually thinking for yourself and take your rose tinted glasses off for a change.

One last point, Bobby commented on the CFO transition, but no comment from Rawson, after 7 years as CFO, bit odd IMO.

Will check their stance with regards to any loss of office payments.

Sparky Pal

‘Also your claim rawson was sacked ? No evidence of that ….”

There’s also no evidence to the contrary, there’s definitely no evidence that it was part of a succession plan. Post up evidence old chap that he wasn’t given the push.

He’s lost his job, that’s a fact, had options waived that’s a fact, he missed this years income forecast, he’s sold 68% of his shares and moved a chunk into tax wrappers, all facts.

Why remove the CFO within 3 weeks of issuing their interim results. They will still be working on that next week after Rawson becomes a NED. Why should he be hands on doing the interims thereafter, simple answer is he won’t, no obligation too. Why not transition after the interims?, would seem to be the more logical thing to do. Let Rawson sign off his last set of numbers.

Thus IMO he has been given the push, the sack, call it what you like but part of a succession plan, nah.

Bye bye Sparky

Is your fantasy filter going back on again?

A PE of 10x to 12x. Why hasn’t it been on that rating?, clearly you are saying the market is wrong and you are right, someone that is a paid ramper and holds no stock here, or elsewhere come to that.

Pass on my best wishes to your other selves - little pip boy, new investor aka Jennifer (you know the guy who was getting close to 3%, via his pension, then it was a trust, and he only ever posted to you questions so you could ramp ramp ramp).

Sparky

For the last time, post up proof that you knew that Bayford were selling and going below 3%.

Think I will email JT and tell him there’s a leak within Bayford directly to a chap called Sparky.

Sparky is so full of it:

“Knew bayford was selling for months been the drag”

Really, are you stating here that you had insider info, me thinks you are saying that in black and white, mmmmm.

Yes Sparky, they have to inform the market when they go below 3% which is what they’ve done following their sell on the 22nd August.

So post up their statement prior to today, and prior to their trade, where they clearly informed the market that they were going to make a trade on the 22nd and go below 3.%, love to send that alleged statement you’ve had to the FCA.

Stalker, pmsl, you aren’t wired up right, I posted and you jumped on my post like you have done since day one. I will always challenge the utter garbage you post up, and my god you are so full of it.

That’s debt not dent!

So the YU oracle, aka Sparky, he that professes to know everything about everything, is saying £20.

Could you explain why and better still when, then I’ll go long again!

absolutely unbelievable, now sparky is saying he knew bayford were selling weeks and weeks ago!, omg, such a bull ****ter and so done that must have insider info as bayfords transaction was carried out in the 22nd, not weeks and weeks ago !.

sparky:- “as you say fella bayford sold and this has been stated and known about for weeks and weeks and weeks just formally confirmed now”

and you were posting that there was a large buyer in the background and a tr1 for increased holdings was on its way, last week too!. so full of crap it’s unbelievable, you are the clown fella.

no sparky you simply don’t filter me, caught you out again today by addressing my comments to you and you responded, gotcha liar!

you say they have no dent, well another bit of false info, don’t you remember rawson in his wisdom took out a £5m loan for metering investment, took a loan despite having c £60m (if i recall) cash on the balance sheet, he said it was a sound financial decision, pmsl. it was even queried at their investor day, and no surprise really.

Sparky the bare faced liar strikes again!

You said I was filtered, clearly not.

You also said a TR1 was coming last week because of all the buy trades, nope, a TR1 because Bayford have reduced yet again.

Completely clueless and a liar.

Sparky TR1, but it’s to notify that Bayford / JT have reduced their holding from 3.15% to 2.68%.

Didn’t JT (Bayford CEO) hold over 5% at one point?

Ps don’t know why they don’t include previous position data, but one should check their holdings TR1 prior to today’s. They are also listed elsewhere as previously holding 3.15%