Member Info for Crocqman

"What I know sometimes happens from experience is that these free public sites can make errors. I've seen some of my sells reported as buys. So have others."

Just to expand on/clarify the above, all trades are reported to the market as just that. A trade. Whether it is a Buy or a Sell is not reported at the time of execution (A Buy or Sell indicator is only a requirement to report the trade to the local regulator by T+1), and so sites like this can only reflect the likely direction on a best efforts basis, based on the mid-price at the time of execution. They show the trade as a Buy or a Sell as an indicator only, based on the algo they use to try to determine the direction at the time of execution.
It will be the same on all sites, not just free sites (even the official LSE site).
It is part of an EU Directive under MiFID II
It is nothing to do with MM games, as is often reorted on these boards, although the reporting of delayed trades is another matter entirely.
gla

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/sep/28/covid-19-tests-that-give-results-in-minutes-to-be-rolled-out-across-world

For info.
Yes, I now ours is quicker, and does not need a health worker to read the results.
Posted to show what is being implemented around the world.
WHO emergency approval provided for one test SD BioSesnor), with the other (Abbott) to follow.

Suggestion that UK govt may look to buy in tests as quicker and cheaper than current 90 miunute tests under trial

You would hope so, nt.
Added some more, sub-0.84 earlier.
Perhaps it will be the finance news that gives the SP the re-rate many seem to be execting
gla

Latest repayment confirmed in cash, as expected (albeit delayed).
Final instalment due in October
gla

What I took from the comments about Cytiva and their partner role was that they would appear to have no potential influence/role in helping to get any U.S. approvals.
Some posters on here seemed to be implying that they would be our foot in the door for getting a 'fast-track' EUA

No update on the latest monthly loan repayment?
I beleive the RNS was a day later than expected last month, and don't recall any mention in the recent placing RNS to repay this in full, or from the placing proceeds over the last 2 months of the facility. Surely, something due on this?

Also, no sign of the investor presentation on the website, as yet. Have been impressed with the IQ updates and comms in general over the past year, so any slip in communication and updates from the bod would be disappointing to se after some good prrogress on this front

"No RNS on Monday"
"Take that to the bank"

Other than the guaranteed RNS for the interims, of course, which could include any manner of additional info that would then be freely available to be discussed in the presentation as it will be in the public domain!

I'm impressed at their ability to 'bash the share on here 27/7'.
Now that's going that extra mile :-)

Yes, skwizz.
Most of the 'bashers' here are long suffering LTH's who have seen SS continually raise funds for extra land grabs at entirely the worng time, and when action is needed.
Look back at the 2019/20 Operations plan RNS (Jan 2019) to see just how little has been achieved compared to what was outlined.
I was expecting to see some good profits by the end of 2020 (ave 1.48), but see that we are years away now from getting close to that, unless an expensive Turkey punt comes good.
Shareholders are merely frustrated at the silence, lack of comms and seeming scattergun approach to operations on multiple fronts, all with big question marks over them.
We are looking for a cohesive plan we can get behind rather than random collection of vague updates we have been seeing to date.
Sadly, over the past 2 years, the 'bashers' have called almost everything right, whereas the rampers have done nothing but continually top-up at these 'bargain prices' and call anyone with a reasoned view a troll, swampie or deramper.
gla

Expecting plenty of media speculation over the weekend with their 'educated guesses' on a potential price.
The SP will most likely jump up to any official pre-lim offer, when received, and I will consider a 50% sell on this first offer to lock in some profit (despite my earlier suggestion of a 400p target).
Everyone should make thier own minds up what to do. Good to have some positive options in this market, for sure, and mine will most likely change according to news over the coming weeks.
Good weekend all

Great update today.
Was late to the party here (buy-in at 145) and sold a small tranche at 221 in recent weeks as need some funds.
Now over 100% up and will look for minimum 400p before looking to take anything further here.
Should be an interesting few weeks ahead here.
gla
gla

Still positive.
Another addition today, just need some positive news.
gla

Live launch cancelled due to technical reasons after a delay of some 40 minutes.
Disappointing for them

I see a few comments re: AFC Energy already. Good stuff providing some free PR

And interim results

Investor presentation.
See 14/09 RNS

Apologies if posted already.
Plenty of innnovation and no one-trick pony, despite all the gloom

https://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/markets/article-8769939/Rolls-Royce-target-test-superfast-electric-plane.html

Funny how 6 months ago, IOW was the big new shiny thing meant to save ukog and revitalise the SP, according to the die-hards here.
First time it seems to have been mentioned in months.
IOW will be a long (very long) struggle with planning, imo.
Volumes are low, sentiment is weak, faith in SS seems t have disintegrated and posters seems to have lost interest.
Who knows what the focus is here though. Does SS have a plan, or is it a case of trying to keep as many plates spinning for as long as possible in the hope that one comes up trumps?

A TR1 would provide a welcome boost here.
There are certainly factors released via recent RNS that would provide confidence for bigger hitters to take a closer look at Angus.
Surely the risks around SF are reducing with each update and the financials are becoming more robust to satisfy investment criteria for II's?
gla

replace the *** with: directors talk interviews . com
remove the spaces