Member Info for crl123

Like I said, they were just dispassionate, which is the norm in most virtual conferences. You don’t see much vibrancy in the Investormeet plstfprm. I cannot think of one I have seen in fact. I have been party to about 12-15. All very coldly businesslike…. Most face to face I have been to are not. So don’t read anything into the modus operandi….they are almost all like that. Investormeet is imo very amateurish and the host very poorly prepared. Never enough time for questions. A poor platform. So both Duncan and the other guy were just same as anyone is on these things. Never seen one with enthusiasm!!! My last one was only a month ago. More serious and humourless than this one ! But more detailed and better prepared. It was the content-or lack of it-not the presentation per se. That was how they all are. He just wants our votes. Did not address funding in detail. Nor our questions. People have bailed out on very little really. It was a low quality presentation done in an ordinary normal way but maybe they don’t know that. Duncan was just being his normal ordinary self. The last interview with him was far better though . He just had one agenda…to be down beat and paint a orry picture of the capital markets to get our support, and to get support for slary increase. Perspicacious. Plain obvious.
The other guy was just woffle. Nothing of value. Unprepared.
I can’t see a company with all these pipelines going to the dogs. Share price may suffer after a probably purposeful downbeat show, but he probably wants to get us worried. Certainly doesn’t give a **** about us, butvthat is normal too.
He was just being how he always is, but had a fixed agenda which did not include our needs.
Company and science not changed. Just the share price and temporary sentiment.
30% down is sentiment -based selling.
Maybe what they want. Retail-based companies are fragile and volatile and he did say this himself!
Flog it or hold. Tomorrow? Who knows?
Lots of news available when 4D decide. Long way off their 63p options remember. And they are losing 80% of their Placing million!

Just don’t like stupid unhelpful comments at the top. Some people really have no idea.

That’s how I see it now too.
That’s all he wanted to do…justify a capital raise of 100% and an increase in salaries. He showed no interest in anything else whatsoever.
Tunnel vision which may backfire on him.

Yes should be if you log in.
Sometimes a delay of a day.

This company will not go bust. Too valuable. To me it is a rather opportune buy . Doesn’t mean it won’t go down further. Can never ever say. But I wish I had bought SNG at 16p for 15 mins in Feb. I was in Norfolk and signal went. They have one product and had panic-stations. Never any guarantees with shares. But this is no one-horse waggon. The more people who sell the freer it becomes from loose p/i’s. Tomorrow? Who knows?
July? August ? Who knows? The market would love people to sell though.
Duncan not being honest. Shame on him. But forget him and look at the company and see what the AGM brings.

This was not an unintentional whitewash.
I can only speculatez But without seeing the votes, he cannot comment on raising capital via holders. I think he knew what he was doing, but the presentation was redundat, unnecessary and content-less.

There is no point having a rights issue or Placing at this price.
I elieve he is just waiting to see the votes on the resolutions, particularly res 9.

Robins
He kept mentioning “ in the longer term” re. shareholders. He is aware that the market is just an ocean of investprs seeking quock profit. He talked in detail about this share spiking and also Seres. He does not want that. To do that you must get rid of private shareholders ( whom he encouraged of course). I do not believe he cares a jot about short or even midcterm share price apart from impacting on capital raise which is important. It was either a very pooy planned and executed presentation or one which set out to demoralise. He knows the share price. He is aware of investor feeling and worries. Yet he led a presentation which focused on the negative and “ challenging.”. In a good presentation, you present how you are dealing with these challenges and not just say you are going to banks and looking for all sources of funding as almost acthrow-away comment. His previous interview was sharp. He did not shave, wear a tie ( basic etiquette-it was not hot at 10:00 ) or make any efforts to impress those whose momey he has taken. I personally believe he is very aware of the downbeat nature of his content and it is for a purpose. He is prrsonally invested here. Private shareholders are irritants.
I believe , but cannot know, that it was an intentionally poor presentation.

As usual!
Ride this one put I say. Sell if you want, but that’s what they want. To get the long term investors Duncan talked about, he would have to be ridvpf pesky short termers. I believe he wants many to sell. The presentation was a sea of negativity….not unintentionally.

People wanted more clarity re funding and direction. That’s what people wanted. He wasxnot willing to commit to giving this.
A good time to buy in my opinion.
Vacuous presentation but nothing at all has changed

Keeping the price low has many benefits for the BOD. If it had risen to .say..40p , then a Placing would seem more lokely. Many other reasons. He clearly did not want the share price to rise. The emphasis was very negative…challenging market…hard times. Not what you would normally hear in a presentation. No. I believe there was an agenda and all is not what it seems. I would love to hear the conversations later. They are not as purposeless as they seem. A slumping price was no accident.
Seriously.

It was the content that was lacking.
I have been to enough sober presentations which have been very good.
They were absolutely fine and Duncan his ordinary presenter-self. I have been to energetic presentations where it proves they are on a rip off..ie BLOE. Such enthusiasm before they ripped you off!!
They were just being who they are as people here. Just calm and easy. In the Novacyt presentation I could have fallen asleep!!
The content was lacking. Not precise re. funding and business plan. Rather lacking.
Duncan is always just calm . That’s fine!
He just didn’t deliver the content which was needed and focused too much on the challenging market.
I have not sold either.
Nothing has changed.
Just a poorly planned presentation.

Contentiously , I would say what a disappointing presentation. But what better way to get rid of pedky shareholders.
And what a time to buy.
A Placing at these prices just wouldn’t add up and investor panic is the norm.
If I wanted rid of snivelling investors, what better way.
He knew exactly how we were feeling and what we wanted.

That was so poor.
Wooly.
No clear funding plans…just to fleece investors 100%.” We are approaching banks and all different options re. funding”. Well how far have you got?
Dear me.
I’m hanging in because it was just a bad ly planned presentation and Investormeet just never allow questions.

Yes we need to know about the business end. 100%

Damn. Typos. Will start checking .

I personally do not feel that the neglect( of shareholders and share proce) is unintentional. Mot that this will ever bre admitted. Even tomorrow.
I am hoping it is not a description of the science and things we already know. Too many Investormeet presentations are just that, with not enough time for questions. It is an Investormeet error. Across the board. So many hosts do not lead or encourage a time onscipus and sharp presentation. Questions are the prompt for this and so few are asked. I too hope for a proper (!) update on plans and financing as much as Blaurix etc. BOD will have already planned their approach. If they don’t answer the questions fully , they are failing. I remain open but absolutely void of naivity. They really need to sell themselves back to us more than new investors.

Un pas de pied at a time I say.
Aucunes expectations.
Suivez la fleuve. ( go with the flow)
ou vendez et vivez avec votre decision.( no thanks at 23p).
Je suis avec Rodney.

My feeling is we should be prepared to wait. Open-endedly. Nothing wrong with hypothesising. But the market factors in expectations and takes advantage. Expectations for a takeover are rarely enacted. It is usually when punters are expecting the least that a buyer may jump in. It is remarkable how mm’s/bidders/lenders will take advantage of expectations in prder to disappoint and drive price lower in order to drive p/i’s out.
I feel this will be a very unwelcome post, but I’d rather be honest. I’ve been in a few takeovers. Not one came at an” expected” time. Of course it could yes! I never expected 23p. Dreadful market atm.
I just say wait for info regarding funding on Tuesday. Don’t read anything into the board apart from facts and stated goals. It’s their job to keep investors sweet remember!
I feel like one of HPotters’s dementors….sucking hope. But I’m not. I’d rather be real. Frankly I can’t wait for a short-squeeze, but that will only happen on funding news.
Keep the positive posts coming to balance out mine :-)

Risky
Thanks
Sorted