Member Info for Cobrakai1

Good to see you're still around Blanka....I won't ask for details on Mrs. Blanka's extension but good news for you it isn't the other way around!

It really must have been a rollercoaster if you've been here that long....I remembered your name but wasn't aware you've been here since Enegi days. Class of autumn 2016 makes me feel like a greenhorn in comparison!

Thanks gg...I'll need some time for my slow mind to digest that, especially the last part, but I aim to be working for MMs within a year so this little challenge can be my first rodeo. Blanka, haven't seen your name for ages....have you been quietly holding all this time or out and back in?

Good advice and will do.....I sense you have a pretty good grasp of that side of things and that's why your posts are welcome. Good to have you back in the Nuog camp and don't go abandoning us again too soon....if you do then post some kind of code word beforehand like 'abort, abort, abort' ;)

Thanks gggg although I'm still struggling with the concept.....every time they raise the bid someone say's 'they're raising to attract sellers' and every time they drop the bid someone says 'they're dropping it to shake out the weak'. About the only part I understand is the MMs seem to win regardless; maybe I need to do some reading and consider a new career path....

So did the MMs drop it to that extent because they knew what was coming? I still can't get my head around MM practices or in fact their legitimate purpose for existing.....why can't a share simply go up when people buy and down when they sell??

Woodster, do one. You've just posted exactly the same post on advfn under the pseudo timw3....anybody who reads advfn will know timw3 is a troll of the lowest order, and that's saying something with so much competition for that accolade over there....

Nice digging....the wording in the JDs is quite interesting too and the fact they will be full-time based in the Manchester office suggests they are going to have enough to keep them busy for the foreseeable.....

It's weird because the roles they've had on MFdevco site for yonks are similar job titles from memory. When I emailed a while ago they replied to say they were generic ads that are there on an ongoing basis. As you said though, these appear new and with very specific JDs. Also noticed an Operations Manager ad on their site...was that one of the generic ones or new as well?

Nice find gggg

Marbur, who from the company said news in the upcoming weeks? Simon tweeted that Graham would be communicating with shareholders in the upcoming weeks and we've already had a podcast so I believe that's one new deadline met. You really are quite the armchair king sitting behind your keyboard calling the shots....perhaps check your facts before posting though....

And before you highlight the $ sign, to my knowledge same thing applies this side of the pond....that was just the simplest explanation I could find to copy and paste without trawling on a saturday night....

SBP, trust you to apply that angle in that way. Correct but unless they wish to be charged with insider trading it's generally good practice to avoid director buying or selling close to news. I'm not saying that's the case here, was just presenting it as a best case scenario.

"Executives and people with access to financial data may only be able to trade the stock in the month following release of financial data (e.g., May 1-31, August 1-31, November 1-30, and February 1-28). Also, since an executive selling a large amount of stock could be viewed as bad and drive the value down, some companies also require key executives to give 30 days notice of their plans to buy or sell stock. Again, it is to prevent insider trading. If you are able to read that the CEO is planning to sell $1B of stock in a month, you may take that as a sign that the stock price is likely to fall and you can sell now. If the stock price does decline, the CEO sells at that lower price in a month.

It is not that the CEO of a public company is not allowed to buy or sell his stock before a positive earnings result, but generally done to avoid being charged with insider trading. If the CEO buys and reports are positive and the price goes up, does any really believe that was not done based on knowing that the report would beat expectations and be viewed as very positive?"

Sorry broad, misread your first post....will slither back into my hole :)

Might be worth checking your own posting history, broad...you've been posting on nuog since April last year so unless you are some weirdo looking for 90p exactly then you could have sold for more....back to the other pseudo perhaps?

Agreed MM...with any luck we are in a closed period and that explains lack of....or maybe that's just wishful thinking!

That's true QT....a pessimist might say it's the old Minty tactic of shifting focus on the basis you can't hit a moving target. Hopefully the scattergun approach is because there are literally lots of bullets loaded and ready to be fired this time....certainly sounds like it if podcast is to be taken at face value.

Look forward to hearing from you again in the not so near future then....also just noticed that your handle contracts to BS....funny that?

That was a good, reassuring listen, which is exactly what we need at this juncture. It's highly unlikely someone with Graham's CV is looking to see out his career with an AIM scam & sham. So that's that one cleared up imo and the trolls who are claiming it's all a scam are seriously running out of angles. However, just because it isn't a scam doesn't mean it will deliver. Case in point is the exploration companies that work very hard indeed and are anything but shell companies, still find nothing.

The difference here is what's already in place and Graham alluded to that a number of times. It really does sound like everything has been tee'd up for a closer to hopefully smash out of the park. Bringing Graham in was a very shrewd move indeed....can you imagine that interview with Minty at this stage in proceedings? The 'jam tomorrow/kicking can' brigade would have had a field day.

I thought the tone was quietly confident and self-assured without being arrogant. It was also nice to hear Simon more relaxed and at ease rather than the bundle of nervous energy he was whilst trying to prove himself in an almost impossible role at the time he joined. As someone who didn't attend the AGM, it's nice to have the thoughts and opinions of those in attendance confirmed from the horse's mouth. I'm with LT in reading people as much as content and he certainly doesn't strike me as someone desperate to prove himself or simply in need of a wage packet. He sounds like he wants to leave his unique mark after a career in the sector and, rightly or wrongly, he has bought into Minty's vision like the rest of us here....or like most of us here anyway.....

I genuinely feel for anyone who has been misled by either the company, Minty or other posters on these boards. Ordinarily I wouldn't rub salt in the wound by calling them out....if Glencaz and BT had dealt with it in a mature way and perhaps taken some ownership themselves then I would have more sympathy.

However, they seem hell bent (perhaps BT more than Glencaz) to drag others down with them. If there was ever an example of two people not to pay attention to in terms of investment decisions then they would both be up there, regardless of the circumstances that resulted in their plight, yet they see fit to harass and bully others daily with investment advice and predictions....pretty bizarre and pretty disgusting too to be fair.

Same here KN.....although if honest holders are paying attention to that discussion board then maybe they are in the wrong game....