Steady Flow 68boepd14 Jan 2021 15:54
Okay so that seems to have disappointed a few people. I'll admit that i am one of them but I was not expecting the headline figures from the initial flow tests. They would always have been unsustainable but I was hope for a bit more than a third. Anyway it is what it is and it still reflects a big uplift in revenue. What else did the RNS reveal or fail to reveal? It revealed the high level of royalties at champion 24-25%. It did not reveal how much oil at F1, is it proportionate to the amount of gas, i.e. about 1/3 of 80bopd? If so after royalties and MSMN percentage it is net 10bopd not big but still a revenue of US$500/day on top of the gas which I estimate now to be about US$900/day based on current Henry Hub prices. I suspect some other costs to come out of that but the figures are now looking between US$300k-400k per annum. Not the earth shattering news we wanted but a big leap in the right direction.
I wonder if the question that was asked of Andy Carroll in a 2019 Proactive interview will be repeated or reminded? That question was how many drills to corporate profitability and rather than dodging the question he relied the recompletion of one of the Stanley wells an Falcon 1. I suspect he might want to revise his answer to not there yet but if this is meeting his expectation and oil/gas prices are not that far different from when he was asked previously perhaps the real answer is close.
The last bit that seems to be confusing people was what "other funding alternatives" means. In the past this would have meant a share issue. It still might still but they are clearly hoping the price will rise to a point where warrants are exercised rather than having to do a share issue and still have the warrant's hanging over them. The warrants being exercised would raise about £1.5m or more (US$2m) It's still a dilution but it's a known event.