Member Info for bonum

So you're Ramping it to actively trade the stock to the detriment of genuine investors & honest research/posting!

Bakky, do you ever post rational, thought out analysis as opposed to mindless ramping. You've instigated a tremendous diservice to genuine investors here and by your own admission, "invested here too early", hence why you're currently 'spiked'. Anyone just needs to look back at your posting here - pure drivel. Regarding your reference to £1bn for mmx, that was a comment by the Chairman Fred Kreuger with independent worked contributions by posters on the BB - whether you accept those or not. Much more preferable to your style of disingenuous, ill thought out ramping, probably knowing full well the validity of rationale linked to the imminent requirement for a Placing here. Can we expect another 'hysterical' contribution by you to protect your own spiked position here - probably!

and well below the Offer price I note.

No!

They can put it where they like tbh

Been listening to the SRT 'spiel' from the early days & they always leave shareholders well short of what they promise. If you feel the inevitable placing will be at a higher level, good luck to you in that belief - I certainly doubt it, especially as the share price will very likely have a marked drop in the coming days anyway as the more savvy traders take money off the table. They also certainly wont be hanging around for the Placing. Atb & good luck!

at 18p again to facillitate instituton stock to the detriment of smaller investor holdings. What are your timescales for profits (if any significant ones) from EO 12886 impacting the bottom line. The Share Price will be hammered back down well before then!

but the necessity of a further Placing is a real one, irrespective of bakky's incessant ramping of this stock!

No way and a Placement inevitable here anyway imho - watch this space!

You should be able to get a Very cheap one soon!

Actually, the Chairman Fred Kreuger (a veteran of building up & selling Tech stocks) clearly stated that no offer below £1Bn would be considered for MMX. I hope that answers your point adequately. You still have not answered my perfectly legitimate concerns here - I suppose 'blind ramping' suits you better. Not all looking in here are so naive!

Btw, I was invested here when it was circa 5p and probably know a lot more about the company & sector then you do - especially in view of your blind, ramping posts here. I'll stick with my assessment thank you. Atb

Let's have an objective assessment of the points I brought up instead of the emotive outpourings consisistent with the type of posting usually resorted to by the Ramper fraternity. I give rationale arguments & worked examples for my investments - whether people agree or not, which is their perogative. I you really saying you dont see a sell off here due to EO 12886 publication - even a blind person can see its alreadt factored into the price!! A major sell off, given the extent of the previous price move, will alnost certainly happen. Especially so in the current market. You may be 'spiked' already but dont be completely silly with your analysis. Atb

Is that the sum of your rationale!! Your posting history on here is a classic example of a blind Ramper tbh! The inevitability of EO 12886 publication would certainly suggest its all already built into the price - what are you trying to convince people of - you're already 'spiked' here.

I think you're also well aware (in some recess) that the inevitability of the EO 12886 publication means all the price rise has ALREADY been built in with people now taking back profits and moving elsewhere. You may be caught on a spike, hence the desperate Ramping but this on a downward ticket unfortunately - imh & objective opinion. Good luck with it anyway, you'll need it as the price continues to drop back!

Do you really think that to be the case - they certainly wouldn't be the first (or last) to suggest it. Why dont you give us the rationale incorporating revenues, profits & cash burn figures instead of relying on Blind Faith.

How long before revenues (if any significant ones) from EO 12886 impact the bottom line, negating the need for a funding round? I would think with the certainty of EO 12886 being published, any expectant rise has already been built into the share price, hence the Sell off by the more Savvy traders. Imho

Stop Ramping this up bakky. The holdings only increased by a minute amount compared to his existent holding - barely 0.4%. Is he trying to buoy up the share price for some reason? Hardly a major sign of confidence that some rampers here are trying to suggest.

The terms of sale seemed highly beneficial to RUR as opposed to IPSA. It makes you wonder as to the details of negotiation with the original buyers ISIS and the eventual collapse of that deal (?)

http://www.investegate.co.uk/geong-international-limited/prn/trading-update/20140529070000PFD1A/ I advised caution as per my 11th & 14th April posts re: the current requirements for the CULS repayment as well as the necessity for established recovery in the domestic market to have taken hold. Until then, major uncertainties exist which the current trading statement does little to address.