Member Info for BlooBird

Wellwell you say:-
"Anyway had enough of this pointless discussion."
That's rich coming from you since you were the one who started this idiotic discussion in the first place.

adoubleuk
Looks like you may have to come back out of retirement !
OILPRICE.COM says:-
"Millennials shunning work in oil and gas. Young people are increasingly steering clear of the oil and gas industry, owing to a combination of factors, including fears about job insecurity and the climate crisis. As a result, the industry could find itself short on talent as aging workers head into retirement. "

It would seem that posters (including myself) are starting to get a bit down-hearted as a result of the SP going down a little each day.
It makes me think of the plaque that I had on wall of my office back in the 70's.
It read as follows:-

'One day, as I sat there feeling down and a little sad, a voice came to me out of the blue and whispered In my ear "cheer up … it could be worse".
So I cheered up … and it got worse.'

2kally
Thanks for the link … fascinating.
I spent over an hour watching that plus the following 2 videos … far better than what was on TV on Saturday night.

carroteater
I think it's best to keep it out of the newspapers for the time being so as not get the Extinction Rebellion idiots too excited. At the moment they are probably too stupid to even know where the Falklands are.

Could someone please explain what the following means ?

"The final shape of any deal is pure guesswork at this stage, if only because Premier and Rockhopper agreed in 2106 that Rockhopper would pay offset development carry fees to re-set the Phase 1a returns at 50/50 NPV."

Does it mean RKH will have to forgo some of the agreed carry in exchange for larger share of revenue ?

Congratulations adoubleuk, you are @ #1
I'm disappointed … I'm only @ #211
http://pumpedordumped.com/rampchecker/rampcheckbytidm.php?search=HUR

If it turns out that Halifax is contiguous with Lancaster then maybe Bader is contiguous with Halifax.
In which case Spark had better hurry up before Hurricane sucks up the whole lot !!

According to Marinetraffic.com its heading to Aberdeen not Rotterdam.

Extrader
you're right of course .. feel an idiot now.

There are some weird SP prices quoted in the RNS @ 16.20 today.
When was the SP ever 114.00p ?

Top Director Buys

Accsys Technologies (AXS)
Director name: Anthony Clegg ,Paul Hugh
Amount purchased: 441,307 @ 114.00p
Value: £503,089.97

Top Director Sells

Hurricane Energy (HUR)
Director name: Kelly,Roy
Amount sold: 110,000,000 @ 46.50p
Value: £51,150,000.39

Accsys Technologies (AXS)
Director name: Anthony Clegg ,Paul Hugh
Amount sold: 441,307 @ 113.98p
Value: £503,001.70

I find it absolutely astonishing that 10 people ( especially you adoubleuk) agreed with Basman when he reckoned that CA and Alken both owned just under 2 billion shares of HUR.

missdosh
Thanks … I've only watched the first and last 20 mins so far ( will watch the rest later) but found it very honest & informative.

ash666
I agree … Dr.T was a bit abrupt and rude.

MaryMullins
I was away on holiday last week and didn't get to see the CMD Presentation.
Would you (or anyone else ) please post the link for the CMD.
Thanks
Bloo

LONGWAIT
"That is why HUR's share price is at about the same level as when it was floated."

When HUR first floated, there were less than 150 million shares issued.
It's now about 2 billion … that's the main reason.

Just re-read latest RNS …. I thought that Hurricane was supposed to be the operator on Greater Warwick!

RBC Capital Markets said: "Today's announcement from Hurricane is disappointing, and we expect the share price reaction to reflect this. However, it does not undermine the next two wells scheduled to be drilled by operator Spirit Energy in the Greater Warwick Area (Hurricane 50%), nor does it impact the potential scale and deliverability of the Lancaster EPS (Hurricane 100%)."

The biggest improvement is that they've got rid of those very annoying adverts for Yellow Pages that used to pop up all the time … used to really **** me off!

LONGWAIT
I think you are being a bit unfair to compare this new website to II … that site is a complete disaster.
I agree with Corral-Part that it seems a bit more responsive than the old site.
Having 'Old-Timers', within a few days, I myself will have probably forgotten what the old site looked like anyway.

Italy obviously can't win (what is there for them to win other than their legal fees) and so they are going for a draw.

Thanks GS